ThankyouMichael
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 423
- Points
- 0
Yep, I also thought about the Victory Tour and the others. But back then, he was young and eager to rule the world, devoted only to his music. And like I said, 50 shows just in the same arena in London only. I really doubt Michael would have ever wanted overexpose himself like that.People keep talking about the 50 shows. It never really occurred to me until people said it was crazy that it might be a really big feat. But I stumbled upon information about Michael's previous tours that put it into a little more perspective for me.
Victory Tour: 55 shows
Bad Tour: 123 shows
Dangerous Tour: 69 shows
HIStory Tour: 82 shows
In that light, 50 shows does not seem insane. Of course, doing that many shows at 50 would be very different from doing that many in his 20s and 30s, so in that respect it could be crazy. And a much longer time has passed since his last major tour, so he was no longer as conditioned for it. In that respect it might be crazy. I'm torn on the issue. I want to say it is crazy for a 50 year old to do that, but Michael was not an ordinary 50 year old man. I feel like only Michael would know if he was still capable of that number of shows. I feel like whether he was scheduled to do one show or 50, though, the outcome could have been the same because Michael was a perfectionist and put his all into the shows. I feel like it is the pressure he put on himself to have everything be perfect more than the number of shows that caused stress. If there was only going to be one show that might have even been more pressure in a way.
I don't know. I guess I have to get used to this feeling of not knowing and always wondering what could have been.
It's been a different scanerio these past few years with the unbelievable heartache of the trial and his kids as the main focus. And age.
50 IS a huge difference from 10 shows... That is overwhelming.