helena22
Proud Member
Maybe, to some extent, yeah. Which is why I can't get myself hyped up.MIST;3895490 said:I don´t like that.It sounds like Michael had absolutely nothing to do with the music,
Is it going to be a Timbalandalbum with Michael´s vocals in it?
I don't think this project is a bad idea, it's just my desire for more unreleased stuff as it is.
I WISH something more if that's actually the case here : the original demo or leftover tracks, I mean, all the things left behind as they are separately from the newly produced tracks. Doesn't matter how complete or "presentable" they are. Hence, the tracklist that reads like this : Chicago (original version) / Chicago (new version). I believe that's the way to do it for posthumous projects. We would have all of MJ and get to see how finished products are put together with the original materials and the flavor. The general public wouldn't really care either way, but it matters to many of us fans, right? I said "wish" because that's not just how majority of albums are put together, that's simply not the norm. But it doesn't take any thinking outside the box to put out both versions? Please don't tell me "Dream on!"