I've reviewed your site and looked at your allegations and your evidence. I believe those of you here doing this are well-intended, and are saying what you think is true. Because the presumption should always be toward innocence, am I right? Don't we wish people had thought that way about MJ?
Photographs of MJ where you think he looks too thin are not evidence for the kind of accusations you're hurling. Look at any aging, skinny rock star. They look gaunt, have turkey necks, lose muscle mass and skin tone. You need to accept that MJ wasn't young anymore, and regardless of his weight could not look as pretty as you wish. You do not have proof he was so sick AEG should have intervened. All evidence points to the opposite, in fact.
Insomnia and its consequences could easily have produced any odd behavior you saw. You know very well he struggled terribly with this all his life and his family and friends had surely learned by now there was little they could do in this regard. Let me make my own mistakes, we've heard him say.
MJ knew perfectly well a show as expensive as what he created would have to run enough times to recoup the costs, and no one can doubt who drove the lavishness of this show.
You believe you as fans have more insight into MJ's private life and business dealings than his family. This is grandiose thinking.
A lot of people could point figures using all kinds of what-ifs, but we shouldn't because it's wrong. What you're doing is conducting a witch hunt without evidence, and this is harming the reputation and emotional health of Michael's friends and colleagues.
I could accuse you of being responsible yourselves for MJ's death, because when people say MJ was "trapped by his celebrity and could not lead a normal life," it was due in part to fans who mobbed him wherever he went, but I won't, because I know you cared for him and meant no harm, and it would be unkind.
I could accuse you of being paid by Conrad Murray to shift the blame off him, for that is what you're doing, but I won't, because I don't have evidence of that.
You are shouting that the naysayers were right and MJ was too washed-up and incompetent to meet his commitments. You say this won't harm MJ's image or legacy, which is too strong to be tarnished -- um, you have short memories.
You're sucking vulnerable, bereaved people into a dark, emotional whirlpool. You're denying many fans the ability to enjoy the celebrations of Michael's life.
Just when MJ's family, friends and fans for the first time in many years could pick up the newspaper and see positive reporting and awareness of his astounding talent, you've created the latest distraction to keep the media from focusing on good news for a damn change.
It's time to end the witch hunt.