mello1
Proud Member
I'm sure that I will have a minority opinion here, but that's okay. It certainly wouldn't be the first time.
It seems to me based on the article, all that this group is saying is that MJ was not well and that the forward momentum of the concert series and all that was at stake may have been the motivation to ignore the warning signs.
Believe it or not, this happens under 'group think'. It's easy when you believe in something or someone so strongly, that viewing other angles is simply not an option. Sometime people hope for the best -- that somehow, everything will work out. Lots of money on the line is powerfully persuasive.
To me, the man looked ill. What I believe is that Murray was giving that man this mess for a period of time. What's worse is this didn't have to be. Somehow, I would have preferred a broke, sued up to the waazoo MJ who was healthy, than have his children grow up without their father.
But that's just my opinion.
It seems to me based on the article, all that this group is saying is that MJ was not well and that the forward momentum of the concert series and all that was at stake may have been the motivation to ignore the warning signs.
Believe it or not, this happens under 'group think'. It's easy when you believe in something or someone so strongly, that viewing other angles is simply not an option. Sometime people hope for the best -- that somehow, everything will work out. Lots of money on the line is powerfully persuasive.
To me, the man looked ill. What I believe is that Murray was giving that man this mess for a period of time. What's worse is this didn't have to be. Somehow, I would have preferred a broke, sued up to the waazoo MJ who was healthy, than have his children grow up without their father.
But that's just my opinion.