Is Cherlyn Lee even going to testify? I don't necessarily take anything she says as accurate, unless she says it under oath and in that sense, we don't know WHAT she did or did not tell Michael, or what he told her. For one thing, I found it very strange that Michael didn't even have a PDR. He read a lot of medical books, and that's kind of a must-have? So, I'll wait to see what she says under oath, if she even testifies at all. To my mind, something was terribly "off" with the way she popped up, and then dropped out of sight. So we'll see if she gives testimony, and evaluate then?
aha ?
you are waiting her to testify and when she testifies you will dismiss her testimony as you always do "we don't know , no one should trust her words.....we should wait until the trial starts"
The girlfriend delivered the most damaging testimony so far placing Murray beside MJ immediately before the last dose and you still insisted the "coughing could be anyone else, Murray's ....etc we should wait " again you dismissed the crucial evidence the most damaging evidence against murray for the sake of what exactly? Is someone else beside Murray and MJ even an option at this point of the investigation or you still have hope the "rest" would be charged?
I'm just trying to understand when this selective dismissal will stop. When we quote someone like Lee, who had a very similar story to Dr. Adams, to Dr.Metzeger , we are faced with the cliche :" we don't know , we should not trust her , why did she disappear....etc"
Logically, what was strange about her? she said MJ told her his doctor told him it was safe, look at the date of the first purchase of propofol , a week before MJ mentioned it to her. Is not that an evidence she was telling the truth? MJ asked Adams about propofol in March, asked Metzeger in April , but Lee was " not trust worthy becuase she appeared suddenly and disappeared suddenly". Will you also dismiss Adams story and Metzeger's?
She appeared only to say MJ was not a graving addict , he was a desperate insomniac. Those words bother you?
when we quote someone who testified under oath we are hammered with the cliche " we don't know , we should wait for the trial .....etc"
When we post link to medical sites explaining how propofol works...etc , we are being told STOP IT YOU DON'T KNOW, leave it to experts ?
When that will stop really?
by the way what do you make of the 20 midazolam vials and 20 lorazepam vials bought ?
Those were mentioned under oath , when will you "evaluate" them? or should we wait for the trial also?
As for Lee , Was Metzger lying too? Was Adams lying also?
