It's also annoying how they said it's not his greatest song. They think that butchered mess is Michael's doing? They haven't heard the original...Yeah, it's annoying how the article calls the 2010 remix "the original".
It's also annoying how they said it's not his greatest song. They think that butchered mess is Michael's doing? They haven't heard the original...Yeah, it's annoying how the article calls the 2010 remix "the original".
Yeah, it's annoying how the article calls the 2010 remix "the original".
Yeah, just like they've always done the right thing thus far, right?Well at least we are talking about music and not court cases or molestation aligations. What's annoying is the fans constantly complaining about every possible release. Just wait and see what happens. I come on this forum for updates and such but it's getting rediculus all the complaining. The estate will do the right thing just let it happen. We all want new music.
Well at least we are talking about music and not court cases or molestation aligations. What's annoying is the fans constantly complaining about every possible release. Just wait and see what happens. I come on this forum for updates and such but it's getting rediculus all the complaining. The estate will do the right thing just let it happen. We all want new music.
Of course they need to look after the MJ legacy, but that also means taking it forward for as long as they can, and that of course requires them to make money. The more money the better for them (salary) and the kids (inheritance) and Sony (profit).
MJ fans endlessly moan about 'integrity' etc but at the end of the day MJ was all about sales. He loved selling millions of albums and he loved being the biggest artist in the world. In my opinion he would love having massive success with posthumous projects, such as This Is It, Cirque du Soleil shows etc. I think MJ would be happy with Sony using his music to appeal to the masses again, and I think if the MJ Estate try to be sympathetic when they rework his unreleased material then it should be ok. This Bieber thing has been blown out of proportion, because while the MJ Estate may have requested Bieber work on STTR, they would never have given authorisation for the leaked version to be released in its current state - it has too much Bieber. The person who leaked it is responsible for this mess, not the MJ Estate.
The song with JB on that article has now been removed due to copyright claim. Only Michael Jackson version remains on that article. I left a comment.Ugh. It just made it to the front page of Yahoo News. The article itself is on The Week website but the link is on the Yahoo News frontpage: http://theweek.com/article/index/24...n-are-together-at-last-on-slave-to-the-rhythm
Do we still think the Estate doesn't need to release a statement?
The MJ Estate has given no authorization for the Justin Bieber recording. They sent a message to the fan bases stating that. SME is now removing them for copyright infringement. The video with JB ruining Michael Jackson's song in your article has been taken down.for CR infringement and Only Michael remains Also STTR was NEVER released and fans have been waiting on pins and needles for it's proper release with Michael's vocals. Then JB pulls this ARROGANT stunt that can jeopardise that.. Is it any wonder the MJ Community is up in arms over it. They have a right to be angry.
Man, people are really still trying to defend the steaming pile of manure that is this remix....smh....
That’s how I feel too. I actually support the Estate, I think they have done many things right. Even when I’m not happy with some of their decisions I try not to be too critical because I know that no matter what they do, they can’t please everyone since fans want so many different things.respect77;3890710 said:I'm actually not one of those who complain all the time about anything the Estate does, but putting Justin Bieber on an MJ record is ridiculous. Sorry if you don't like it but I'm not going to applause that.
Come let us reason together
I don't think It was an accident that Bieber's camp leaked his version of STTR. Probably knew it would not be considered or authorized for a release so Bieber wanted to get it out anyway. The leak doesn't make $$$ for anyone. If Bieber's camp thought the song would be considered for an official release by the Estate $$$ they wouldn't have leaked it. But one thing the leak has done is let the Estate know what MJ fans feel about STTR and JB recording any MJ music. I doubt he will ever be considered for anything like that after this arrogant stunt. SME is removing them systematically from the interenet. It is not an easy chore and some slip through the cracks as anyone who uploads on YT knows.
We don't know if Bieber was given permission to work on the song and submit it for consideration or not. Or if he just took it upon himself with Max meadows. We do know the Estate said it was NOT authorized. We also know that many artist and producers vie to work on MJ songs. (Same as when MJ was here ) That in No way means the songs they work on will ever be authorized or chosen for a release by the powers that be. It doesn't make them official in any way. Most artists respect that and know not to leak any work they are doing for others artist. They know it is wrong and will jeopardise their chances to be considered by others in the industry as well.
Justin Bieber comes off as arrogant about this Leak (Publicity stunt) and even tweeted behind the leak about MJ. There was No apology, just a tweet from the producer (Max Methods) which comes off as nothing more than an oops. I don't think we can blame the Estate for thier actions any more than we would blame MJ for what others produced or leaked when he was here.
The Blame goes to Justin Bieber and his camp for this Arrogant Stunt...
Some fans are being pretty dang harsh, mean, and judgmental towards Justin bieber considering we are Michael Jackson fans.. With all the bad press mj got we were smart enough to stand by him and not judge.. And preach how its wrong to be so disrespectful towards a person.. Cutting and pasting mj quotes supporting that.
But now I see some fans doing exactly what we preached against towards bieber..
I don't think anyone here has a legitimate reason to hate bieber.. None of us have spent a moment with the kid/guy..
Its easy to excuse Michael for questionable actions but some seem not to be as fair to others.. I'd just think these fans would think a little more about it while knowing all the ammo they have to throw at us..
Some fans are being pretty dang harsh, mean, and judgmental towards Justin bieber considering we are Michael Jackson fans.. With all the bad press mj got we were smart enough to stand by him and not judge.. And preach how its wrong to be so disrespectful towards a person.. Cutting and pasting mj quotes supporting that.
But now I see some fans doing exactly what we preached against towards bieber..
I don't think anyone here has a legitimate reason to hate bieber.. None of us have spent a moment with the kid/guy..
Its easy to excuse Michael for questionable actions but some seem not to be as fair to others.. I'd just think these fans would think a little more about it while knowing all the ammo they have to throw at us..
Most bieber fans (no it all) are respectful to Michael and we are giving them reasons not to be.. We represent Michael now! He's not here to do it,.
One standard for Michael Jackson and another for everyone else. Proven by the way people have reacted to the song. Will they apologize? Will they balls.
Did I say that? No, stop jumping to conclusions. I just said the way people acted towards the Estate was disgraceful given the lack of information at the time.Apologize for what? For not liking Justin Bieber butchering Michael's song and this whole stunt? I didn't know everyone is obliged to love Justin Bieber and what he did with Michael's song now.