I will say this very simple thing, which any judge has to take into account and which is a precedent in law.
Any agreement a person is made to sign at a time when they are under duress, undue influence, mentally or emottionally exhausted, is invalid.
That's why when a person who is unwell, mentally incapacitated, not of sound mind, sick in hospital or dying, is made to sign any contract, without the presence of an independent party to oversee and ensure the interests of that person are protected, then when that agreement is challenged in court, it's a precedent that it gets nullified.
Michael was visibly mentally exhausted after the trial and under a lot of duress over a lot of issues.
This Prince got Michael to sign a contract, significant undertakings, without the presence of a third party to oversee Michael's interests in the mental state that he was in after the trial, with Michael being resident, under the care and a guest in the country and Kingdom where the Prince is of great influence, son of the King.
The agreement therefore is subject to nullification based on legal precedent.
Unless the judge deliberately disregards Michael's mental and emotional state at teh time, there is no way the agreement sails through.
Michael's lawyers especially would be best served if they showed court the process prior record label contracts with Michael have taken to be drafted up. It's a long process, with Michael legally represented to protect his interests.
Then that should be compared with how this agreement was drafted and presented to Michael without legal represantation, which was taking advantage of someone in a compromised mental and emotional state.
There is no way that agreement then remains valid.
