The two aren't mutually exclusive. 'A drughead physician with serious money problems, who was about to lose his house, becomes Mike's doctor and has to do what he's told before he sees his payday.' Either way, it was still a homicide.
My earlier point (did I post it here?) was that we only have Murray's word about what he gave Mike and when. Who knows the real timeline and order of the administration of the medications other than Murray?
He can say anything. For all we know, he stacked a bunch of $hit on top of each other, over the course of one or two times, instead of spreading it out like he claimed. We still have nobody's word but Murray's. We still don't know who he was talking to on the phone for 40+ minutes.
I so agree with you. The timeline of events is so important to what happened to Michael. It's obvious that Murray has lied about the true timeline--and many other things too. And for much of it, there's no way to really know what happened, how, or exactly when, because we only have the word of someone who was obviously lying, to protect their own A$$. And if you're not guilty of something, there's no need to lie, or to hide, or to try to cover things up as Murray did. Even if Murray never intended to kill MJ, his actions following his death prove that he KNEW he'd done wrong, and then tried to lie and cover it up.
I would definitely like to see Murray arrested, but IMHO, the fact that they haven't done it yet means they're not going to until they have enough evidence against him to lock their case. Think about it: would you really want them to go to the grand jury for an indictment, and then screw up with lack of evidence or something else, so that they can't indict him? Or worse yet, get the indictment and go to court, only to have lack of evidence be the thing that gets Murray found not guilty?! I'm hoping that the police are working to build a solid case against Murray, and anyone else that may be involved. There's more to this case than just the propofol (though obviously, that's a huge part of it). They need to get as much hard evidence as possible to win a conviction...and hopefully that's what they're doing.
As for other comments where fans are irked when someone says Michael should bear some of the blame...I get irked too. And this is what I would say to those people who think Michael should bare the blame.
I don't see why any person (MJ or anyone else!) should be held accountable for something they did not do intentionally to themselves. If Michael was asking for help for insomnia, he was NOT asking to sleep PERMANENTLY! He trusted a physician (or more than one perhaps) who prescribed him medications for anxiety and insomnia. He trusted that he would take the medications and be able to be free of his stress long enough to be able to just sleep. IF he asked for propofol, or anything else he should not have been taking, it was the DOCTOR'S ethical, moral, professional and personal responsibility to SAY NO to anything that was not meant SOLELY for aiding MJ to go to sleep.
Propofol is used in hospitals--it induces COMA, NOT SLEEP--and puts a patient at risk for death if not administered and monitored correctly. Murray should never have administered propofol to MJ. EVER. It was criminal (IMO) for him to do so, but surely was with blatant disregard for the life of Michael Jackson, which makes him, IMO, solely responsible for his death. It was not MJ's job to say no to propofol: it was MURRAY'S! If he could not find another way to treat MJ's insomnia, then he should have found someone else who could.
Michael is dead because this person gave him a drug he should never had been given. The argument that someone else would have given it to him if Murray hadn't is moot, because, indeed, Murray gave it to him...and if he hadn't, Michael would still be alive, and we would be talking about his concerts at the 02 and his birthday rather than this sickening mess!
Sorry, all. That got very long. After reading through 40 pages of posts, I felt like I had to offer my full feelings on this topic.