shimar
Proud Member
that's my point exactly , the body SPOKE with the coroner , regardless of what murray said . murray could have said I did not inject him with anything and the coroner would still say it was a homicide BASED ON THE BODY , not what murray is claiming .
murray could very well change everything he admitted to , the coroner can''t come to court and say well , i said it was homicide becuase the suspect at the time said he injected him with these drugs , and since now he is changing his story maybe the victim overdose himself after all .
Yes & triple YES!
The body does speak - even with the claim of multiple injection marks - the coroner can determine whether there was consistent syringe use throughout a period of time or made hours before deat - or made AFTER death.
Please note: the death certificate said "injection by another" and not "acute propofol intoxication."
So if Murray claims that Michael did overdose himself, that claim is weak against the death certificate's "Injection by another" - and I am more than sure that the marks found were made post-death to make it look like Michael did it to himself.
There is no way Michael could've woken up to demand more with the AMOUNT of medication and the TYPES that were mixed. The amounts used make his homicide more deliberate than accidental.