aprilshack
Proud Member
i hope the lapd are holding murray under house arrest because if not i can see him flying away.and pretty sure theres others involved who will help him.
Bastard is probably running for the Mexican border as we speak....
i hope the lapd are holding murray under house arrest because if not i can see him flying away.and pretty sure theres others involved who will help him.
The Epinephrine/Epedrine will have been to try and save Michael.
This is about Spinal Anesthesia - but here you go-
http://www.apsf.org/resource_center/newsletter/2001/fall/04cardiac.htm
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Summary [/FONT][/FONT]
While many factors can contribute to cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia, vagal responses to hypovolemia often play a key role. Patients with risk factors for bradycardia or those with other vagal symptoms may be at increased risk for cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia. This has important implications. Spinal anesthesia may not be the best choice for a patient with vagotonia or for a procedure where rapid blood loss is likely. When a spinal anesthetic is selected, maintaining preload should be a priority and prophylactic preloading with a bolus of IV fluid should not be omitted.
Standard regimens for volume preloading may not be sufficient to maintain adequate preload, so a low threshold for administering additional fluid boluses or using a vasopressor may be appropriate. For patients with bradycardia ('heart slowness'/cardiac arrhythmia) during spinal anesthesia, the stepwise escalation of treatment of bradycardia with atropine (0.4-0.6 mg), ephedrine (25-50 mg) and if necessary epinephrine (0.2-0.3 mg) may be indicated. For cardiac arrest, full resuscitation doses of epinephrine and atropine, additional volume loading and transcutaneous pacing should all be considered. With the popularity of spinal anesthesia and the reported frequency of these arrests, the potential impact of these interventions on further improving the safety of spinal anesthesia could be substantial.
I just cannot believe that the media still insists on try to make Michael seem like an addict.....I mean you would think the headline would be "Michael Jackson death ruled a HOMICIDE" but noooooooo its "DOPE found in Jackson home" We F--- them because it was not found in his system. Why am i suprised?
This hurts
The manner of death is ruled: "HOMICIDE."
I just cannot believe that the media still insists on try to make Michael seem like an addict.....I mean you would think the headline would be "Michael Jackson death ruled a HOMICIDE" but noooooooo its "DOPE found in Jackson home" We F--- them because it was not found in his system. Why am i suprised?
Oh...my...god. I hope we get to hear the complete truth and that there will be justice...That is where my head is at because it explains so many things that were unanswered like why was Michael losing weight? Why was Michael so hyped during practices when he was obviously dropping weight like crazy??!! Why did Michael lose his appetite to eat and was down to maybe 1 meal a day? Many fans said during the week of fathers day his mood changed completely. Why?
Ephedrine causes all of the above. My question is how many times did Michael almost die under Murray's care before the inevitable happened on June 25th? How much of this crap along with all the other drugs did he really give Michael? Michael was literally drugged to death over a 6 week period... How could Murray do this?
In my opinion, so that he WOULD die, so AEG could collect on the insurance, so they could market the film, and take memorbilia on tour, and utilize many other money-making opportunities. Also in my opinion, Murray was just the tip of the iceberg. We know Michael was murdered. We know who gave him the propofol. We do NOT know the other circumstances.
Sky news are saying that the LAPD have now referred the case to the District Attorney to decide on criminal charges.
Can we please have an arrest now! What more do they need for feks sake
I tend to disagree.
With the amount of propofol and other medications administered every 1.5 hours by Murray?
This was no accident.
Someone wanted Michael dead and Murray was the hit man.
And can they be trusted? Is the LAPD and DA different than Santa Barbara? I am just asking because I want to know and I feel I don´t know enough to have an opinion. I have heard some people say that they don´t trust them. Sneddon should have been prosecuted for wrongful prosecution imo. (I admit that at the time I was thinking it would neeeeever be like that in my country but after that I did some reachers and I tell you now I have a different opinion. I was naive).Wonder how long it will take for them to make a decision?
That is where my head is at because it explains so many things that were unanswered like why was Michael losing weight? Why was Michael so hyped during practices when he was obviously dropping weight like crazy??!! Why did Michael lose his appetite to eat and was down to maybe 1 meal a day? Many fans said during the week of fathers day his mood changed completely. Why?
Ephedrine causes all of the above. My question is how many times did Michael almost die under Murray's care before the inevitable happened on June 25th? How much of this crap along with all the other drugs did he really give Michael? Michael was literally drugged to death over a 6 week period... How could Murray do this?
:clapping:In my opinion, so that he WOULD die, so AEG could collect on the insurance, so they could market the film, and take memorbilia on tour, and utilize many other money-making opportunities. Also in my opinion, Murray was just the tip of the iceberg. We know Michael was murdered. We know who gave him the propofol. We do NOT know the other circumstances.
not anything we didn't already know.
Just 'cause some people are going batshit already:
homicide does not necessarily mean premeditated murder. Criminally negligent manslaughter falls under the category of homicide.
the full toxis reports wasnt released. all thats been released are the things that helped to cause the deathow? Im not being arsey I just dont understand everything
That is good news. It means that the LAPD feels that their case is solid enough to be presented to the D.A. Now it is up to the D.A. to charge Murray, hopefully with Murder in the 2nd degree - and in California you do not have to have motive to be charged with Murder in the 2nd degree. You just have to prove implied or expressed malice and consciousness of guilt.
Manslaughter is homicide without malice or premeditation.
one thing is: i dont understand it why murray would have wanted michael dead? can someone explain? i think - actually if it was about money, then he would have made him an addict or somewhat but dead he doesnt gain something from it? i dont understand that at all....
not anything we didn't already know.
Just 'cause some people are going batshit already:
homicide does not necessarily mean premeditated murder. Criminally negligent manslaughter falls under the category of homicide.
Didn't the police find other appetite suppressants in Dr. Murray's bag or office during one of the raids? Phen-Phen or something like that?
Yup. According to the search warrant affadavit, Murray admitted giving Michael the propofol and all the benzodiazepines found in his system. There's no saying that Michael was sneaking other drugs and not telling him. Murray must have really screwed up the administration of the propofol for the coroner to have found an acute dosage in Michael's system. Otherwise, he would have metabolized some of it, and we would be left with an ambiguous situation. It sounds like Murray also gave too much Lorazepam or too much Lorazepam for the amount of propofol he intended to give. But rather than admit a possible mistake, he failed to tell the EMTs everything he'd given Michael. He chose to protect himself.
At this point, to suggest Murray was stoned at the time is almost a kindness.
In my opinion, so that he WOULD die, so AEG could collect on the insurance, so they could market the film, and take memorbilia on tour, and utilize many other money-making opportunities. Also in my opinion, Murray was just the tip of the iceberg. We know Michael was murdered. We know who gave him the propofol. We do NOT know the other circumstances.
that cali law that geragos mentioned u didnt need malice etc just a very high level of negligenceeh but for malice there has to be 'intent to harm' .. is this not basically the same as 'motive'
Quote:
yea in the houston raid i think
ok this brings up a question for me anywyas, if the damm doctor waited the long time he did making those phoen calls etc.. i wonder how much of that shit was really in michaels system if that much time had passed before the EMTs arrived and he arrived at the hospital.. it makes me sick to think about it..they have said acute... so that means high lvls where found? and what 82 minutes passed according to that report last week before 911 was called..? :bugeyed