nteresting indeed... that took them long.... Its funny and quite sad too.
Oxman files and claims MJ paid for his dad's living via Katherine, Leonard Rowe gives a declaration in support of that by claiming MJ "told him this" and that Katherine "told him this". Leonard says so must be true! Oh and Oxman also gives a declaration again supporting that statement so between Rowe and Oxman both claiming MJ said this to them it must be true right?
Joe claims Katherine willingly gave him 50% of what she got from Michael through the years on Micheal's orders? I can see how this is playing out. Leonard, Oxman and Joe have sat on Katherine... she will "agree" that the story is true and so the courts should up Katherine's allowance to allow her to share it with Joe, or better yet Joe would prefer that money straight to him.
The most interesting quote in the filing is "Mr. Joe Jackson does not have a substitute for Michael Jackson's support". What does that say of his other kids? Janet Jackson with her millions of dollars is not a substitute? Tito and the rest of them? Will the court find that statement reasonable?
Another interesting quote is this:
QUOTE
He(Joe) has monthly expenses which exceed $20,000, and since Michael Jackson's death,
Mr. Jackson has been forced to bear these expenses on his own.
A person entitled to a family allowance may not be denied the allowance because they have
sufficient property for their own support. Estate of Walkerlev. 77 Cal. 642, 646 (1888)(person entitled to family allowance notwithstanding provision made for them from other sources). The court must make
reasonable allowance out of the estate because the legislature has provided for an allowance without regard to the person seeking the allowance to use up their own estate. Estate of Lux. 100 Cal. 593, 603 (1893). It makes no difference that the person seeking the family allowance has property of their own out of which to support themselves. Estate of Bump, 152 Cal. 273, 276 (1907).
basically since MJ's been dead Joe has managed to pay for his expenses himself but they still ask the court to give him allowance even if Joe has property/money enough to support himself.
Isn't this filing embarrassing especially for Janet Jackson? She's alive and a multi-millionaire yet her DEAD brother has to take care of her living parents? Enough for her father to sue her dead brothers estate for support? Janet surely can pay for her father claimed $15k a month no? Also Joe's house in Vegas is bought its not rented... he must be claiming rent for the additional apartment he has? Did Joe go to Janet and she said no so now he see's its easier to get the estate money instead?
Joe claims not to have an income and yet he's been going around promoting his label? he even has a artist or several for it, its been claimed he's selling grills with Ronaldo, he makes many many appearances and gets paid for them in Vegas, in Europe, in LA etc...
Worse of all, I suspect this is being done to eventually force Katherine's hand later when probate is over to folk over to Joe 50% of what MJ left her. If he's claiming that Michael in life asked Katherine to give over 50% of the money MJ gave her to Joe.... Joe is now angling through this suit if it goes through to later force Katherine to give him 50% or the 40% money share she'll be getting from the estate per year..when probate is over. (just my opinion... speculation)
Notice Oxman, Rowe claim MJ and Katherine said this and yet there is no declaration from Katherine stating this, no declaration from the accountants who processed that money saying the same.
we shall see....
and yeah Joe and Randy should definitely get the estate to run, no? Branca/McClain should be kicked out and Joe, Rowe, Oxman, Randy given the freedom to run it.... they'll just "advise" Katherine and sit on her to stay quiet and take care of MJ's kids and get her allowance... no? i think MJ would HAPPY if that happened no? I mean look how experienced they are! Oxman is an excellent lawyer! he will run the estate.... they'll bring Don Stabler to do the accounting too no?
As someone said elsewhere once.... "they'd rather the family run the estate to the ground than have anyone else running it successfully" I mean MJ's kids future be damned.... MJ would be happy if his family took the estate and ran it to the ground... after all they are family....
Page 17, the letter claimed to be MJ hiring Leonard Rowe.... look at it very carefully.... its interesting no? All of MJ's other letters for anything since he came back had his "The Michael Jackson Company" letter head or address at the top......also look what's been crossed out and written in by pen... and then look at MJ's signature and his other signatures...
*waltzes out of the thread* carry on....
RIP MJ
h34r:
