Beachlover
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,573
- Points
- 0
Its very hard to watch Janet only because for me it brings back my own loss of my sister as well as opening wounds of Michael again.
And was it any different from the excerpt already posted?? I'm guessing it wasn't judging from the lack of posts following that airing.
Not this dude again.
you are splitting hairs with me.
yes..i see the comments on the internet. many of them. too many days..too many people. it doesn't matter what forum they are in, it's just too many people. real people.
partial blame? that's just splitting hairs.
i SaW the comments. they are far from pretty, and analytical. and they are from real people.
i'm not taking things too seriously. i notice in other posts of yours, you don't like people making assessments about you. please don't make them about me. how serious i am, is not the issue.
which brings me back to Michael. i have a problem with people making assessments about him. the way you have a problem with people making assessments about you.
the way i have a problem with you making an assessment about me. we're not psychiatrists, here. and even if you are one, i didn't pay to have myself analyzed.
In light of all that is being said and done since Michael died, I have one simple question - who looks out for his legacy? There is more to his legacy that selling CDS or film tickets. Is there no one who can officially speak up on behalf of Michael? No-one?
^No. NO one to look out for his legacy. Nope.
So basically she said exactly what a few of us thought she did. She said in plain plain English that MJ had a problem he never overcame, was a drug user like her ex Rene Debarge, and was in denial. Did she say what kind of drugs, or intervention btw? And of course she wasn't pressed for clarification. Why? Because they headlines must go on. Why spoil the druggie image by clarifying stuff?
He was always alone.
^No. NO one to look out for his legacy. Nope.
So basically she said exactly what a few of us thought she did. She said in plain plain English that MJ had a problem he never overcame, was a drug user like her ex Rene Debarge, and was in denial. Did she say what kind of drugs, or intervention btw? And of course she wasn't pressed for clarification. Why? Because they headlines must go on. Why spoil the druggie image by clarifying stuff?
He was always alone.
I don't know guys, this is making me really sad. she's totally painting him as an out and out addict. ugh. she never said a word about the insomnia. nothing. nada.
Michael's death was not a black and white situation. but as his most beloved sister, she could say a little bit more about what drove him to use the Propofol in the first place.
I don't know what to say. I'm going to have to think about this.
EDIT: wait, they said something just now about the sleep problems. I guess I'll wait and see.
and yes, he was always alone. and he knew it. oh god did he know it.
I agree with you. Janet Jackson comes off as being insufferable and very self-serving and self-centered. uke:Looks like Janet doesn't give a shit..... sorry just my opinion.
Janet did a very bad job ,,, the victim role is not interesting any more Dunk.
In light of all that is being said and done since Michael died, I have one simple question - who looks out for his legacy? There is more to his legacy that selling CDS or film tickets. Is there no one who can officially speak up on behalf of Michael? No-one?