anytime joe jackson is on tv i try not to watch anymore as i feel like throwing a brick through the tv and i cant afford a new one so its easier not to watch him
That whole thing about Katherine calling MJ that is from trashy tabloid book about MJ's life. I got the book years ago for my b-day and I remember that part very well. There's no proof she ever said that.
OMG, I can not watch this...this is hurting me....OMG...this Leonard saying MJ was a C addict????? OMG OMG...and JOe supporting this guy...OMG OMG...
I need help...I can stomatch lot but I cant do this....
OMG
I am gone...
OMG. Joe Jackson is the father of MJ and he has no clue what life his son had....this is .....tragedy...I am gone...
Was I the only one that got the feeling that the rest of the family has turned their back on Joe?
EDIT: "turn their back" might been a bad expression - I mean, they have shut him out.
Oh I could've told you that and that is why I didn't even bother watching LKL. Joe really doesn't know anything. I wouldn't be surprised if he really didn't know where is son is buried. Since Joe insists on being a loose cannon, the only thing one can do is keep him out of the loop while the real business is being attended to...
No that wasn't what he meant, nothing about cocaine.
It was a comparison he made, meaning that if Michael had an addiction to pain killers/diprivan/whatever then you should not have someone that can enable you those things around you 24/7.
who is that plastic woman at the end?
Its bit more to it then that. Michael clearly want to do the 10 shows. Its the 40 added to it thats the problem. Also please read the chris apostle and corey rooney interview to get a bit of insight on how michael works and why he proabably did TII. But most importantly I think it was tohme who gave the green light for the addition of the shows without michael's consent. Also they had nothing to gain from michael? You should check out the aeg thread trish started to get a better picture on what all aeg stands to gain.
Leonard Rowe is frustrating me... he really is. He makes it sound as if Randy and Frank were holding a gun to Michael's head, forcing him to do 50 shows, forcing him to hire people he didn't want to hire, forcing him to write letters that state he didn't want anything more to do with him.
That's Michael's signature right there. The meeting he is talking about in the video happened 5 days before this letter was written. Leonard must have said something that Michael didn't agree with. If Leonard really did have MJ's best interests at heart, why would Michael get rid of him? MJ ain't no damn puppet. It isn't like someone can force Michael into writing this. Leonard expects us to believe that Michael was soo controlled that he would write a document that basically tells his "good friend" and advisor for more than 30 years to take a hike. If Leonard was as sincere as he said he was, Michael would have never fired him. After all, MJ was always looking for people he could trust, right? Leonard just can't stand the fact that he was cut off, so he's making up garbage. Michael has been business for 40 years. If he doesn't like you, he'll fire you. It's that simple. Bob Jones didn't even get a reasonable explanation when he dismissed after 20 years of working with Michael. Why do you think Jones chucked a massive hissy fit after Michael fired him? Why do you think he spread so much garbage about Michael? How many ex-employees testified for the prosecution in the trial? Once Michael cuts them out, they go on a rapid rampage. It's the same thing every time. Leonard ain't no different. When Michael hires them, it was his choice. When he fires them, it's always someone else forcing him to do it. :smilerolleyes: They can't accept that Michael fired them himself. They just can't accept it.
Do you know, This is the same thing that happened in '93. I mean Joe comming out and talking. The 1st ppl. to give interviews were Jermain and Joe. I know some of you Might Disagree with me, but all this hoopla with Joe and Leanord and Chef and bodyguard and ppl. that came out saying Michael wasnt feeling well the past month or something, is just some BS!!! They are all wanting this publicity. Because this is the only time they have to do it.
There are problems Michael had with his body, he took meds for his cronic back pain, for his leg because of dancing so much, for the pain that came from the head injuries, for his vitiligo and Lupus. and those Medicens might have had side effects and It Just Kills Me to see people saying that Michael took meds only because he was addicted.
I dont know if they knew or not about his pains, but to just say he took Meds with out a reason is just A bunch of BULL!!!
And what is this i read somewhere on this thread that katerine called mj a MOTHERF**** WTF!!!??
A summary of people running around with drug stories
MICHAEL's HEALTH
- Brian Oxman - last saw Michael in the trial in 2005 when he was fired by Mesereau
- Deepak Chopra - last saw Michael in 2005 for just a week when Michael was acquitted
- Uri Geller - last saw Michael in 2002 after meeting Michael in 2000
- Matt Fiddes - last saw Michael in 2001, saw Michael for just 3 days
- Leonard Rowe - Last saw Michael in 2009 after not seeing him for over 20 years - hardly close to Michael
- Nutritionist - last saw Michael a long time back - claims Michael spoke to her 3 months back, then his last Sunday
- she says on Sunday, Michael's staff called her saying he was hot and cold on one side
- her story contradicts Dr Klein's story who says on Monday, Michael was dancing in the office
- she started off the diprivan story- Dr Klein - runs off with drug addict innuendo which has to do with 1993
- refers to diprivan in HIStory tour, unsure whether the story is original knowledge or he is copying the nutritionist- Former security guard - Last saw Michael in 2003
- says Michael was overprescribed, but he is not a doctor to know why Michael was prescribed each given medication- Tabloids - carrying the story that Jackson’s tried to intervene, yet Geragos, Mez, Ramone, who cover 2003 to 2007 period saw no such basis to intervene
- and Jacksons released a statement in 2007 refuting that
We all know he had
All this stuff needed medication at one point or another
- Lupus
- Vitiligo
- Fire injury
- Back problems from 1999
- 1998 injury while dancing, foot in cast, as well as other dancing injuries
- Spider bite in 2001
- Dancer's feet problems
- Depression because of Sony in 2001, Bashir in 2003 and trial in 2003 to 2005, media attacks and not to forget 1993
- and possibly other treatments, fever and so on when he was feeling unwell
Michael could not stop taking lupus medication just because he had to take depression medicine
And that applies to back injury medication and so on.
There is a reason for all this medicine, but for an outsider or security guard, it looks like "overprescribed" when he sees all the medicine that Michael has.
The media that loves scandal, does not want to explain any of this for the viewer, as long as one of the ignorant, self-serving people above come along and make allegations that he was a "drug addict", no discussion of any of his ailments.
And I can bet Schmuley is quiet and busy writing his book too so as to cash in. It's surprising he only spoke once on tv unlike the usual rounds he makes.
THE TRUTH
The truth about Michael's death can only be one
I WILL SHARE SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT
- - It was a prescription he took - which is unlikely unless it conflicted with something the doctor prescribed
- - diprivan and he failed to wake up - but that assumes this doctor took on an anaesthologist role which he shouldn't, something he has denied
- - It was something the doctor prescribed - which he has said nothing he prescribed was lethal to kill Michael
- - It was lupus - a possibility given that the autopsy was inconclusive
- - It was poison - may never be known
Many years back when I wasn't into MJ, I was somewhere and I heard a speaker talk about how Michael would live to be 49yrs old only because of the condition that he had.
At that time, I didn't know too much what he was talking about. But when I got to know Michael more this decade and then learnt that he had lupus, from time to time I was concerned about him when I recalled what that person said, but when I saw people who had vitiligo up to 80yrs old, I sort of brushed it aside.
I also knew Michael was aware of the risks, therefore he always had an umbrella to prevent skin cancer.
When he became 50yrs old, I recalled what that guy had said and was happy that Michael had passed that 49yr mark the guy had spoken of.
But after Michael's death and reading more about Lupus, I realise Lupus may have had a significant role to play, especially at this point in time when it may have been more lethal.
Michael complaining about not feeling well was an alert, and had he been around a doctor who knew his medical history and lupus quite well, Michael should have spent the night in hospital or a clinic, not in the home.
The alternative of close observation at home should have been with pulse-monitoring equipment, with an alarm when the heart rate/pulse begins dropping
As Tito said, the doctor panicked, because when he found Michael's heart rate dropping, the first thing would be to call for an emergency, not to try and fight to resuscitate someone with a lupus condition. That is where things went wrong.
This is a history of Michael fainting
1980 - Triumph tour gets cancelled
1990 - he phones his doctor who calls 911 to go to Michael's flat
1995 - rehearsals for HBO, Michael was rushed to hospital
1999 - Sony studio. Michael was rushed to a clinic
2003 - On his was to Steepletown deposition, Michael was rushed to hospital
2009 - In his home, doctor performed CPR for 20 to 30 minutes before calling 911 - a delay in rushing him to hospital
Therefore, his health could not be stabilised in time to override whatever life-threatening ailment he had, which possibly is lupus that can attack the heart from time to time
Was I the only one that got the feeling that the rest of the family has turned their back on Joe?
EDIT: "turn their back" might been a bad expression - I mean, they have shut him out.
Great well thought out reply which makes a lot of sense, thanks Like others have said though, if it was down to the lupus it would have been announced by now which leads you to think something funny went on and its been shown on autopsy report. That is only speculation I know. We all just have to wait and see. Anyone's else head so confused it could burst with all this?! Imagine how Michael felt living his life, poor man!
I don't think people who blame AEG give Michael credit for having a mind of his own. They had nothing to gain by forcing an obviously sick or addicted person on stage and Michael was perfectly capable of knowing what he could and could not do.
Does anyone remember reading what Kathy Smith, the fitness video lady said when she met him 2 weeks before he passed? She wrote in her blog the day after Michael died that he was in the same building she was and she said he was trying to cancel a concert and she said that he said they were SO MEAN, SO MEAN. This sounds a lot like the control issues being mentioned by Joe, Leonard, Terry Harvey, etc.
http://www.kathysmith.com/blog/2009/06/
From the blog: We talked for a while. He introduced me to his children - who were sweet, beautiful, and clearly adored their father - and he told me about canceling an upcoming concert in London. “The people were so mean,” he said, visibly upset. “Just so mean.”