Unpopular opinions

But very few of those styles were part of the Minneapolis sound. I would only really class his first four albums as true Minneapolis sound. The pop, rock, jazz and soul aspects of his music came when the purists started accusing Prince of selling out (with 1999 and PR).
Hence...

Maybe it would do it justice to call it.. The Prince Sound.

Because all that Prince did by himself was very influential to musicians among his own generation and beyond (with the contemporary soul, funk and electronica acts, let alone pop.)

Therefore...

Prince is adept at covering many different styles, but the only sound he can be given partial credit for inventing is the Mineappolis sound, which has nothing to do with jazz or rock or folk influences.

... he created his own sound, which has everything to do with jazz, rock, folk and the other influences.
 
the definition of musician is highly subjective. i believe Michael is a better musician than Prince, because, sonic-wise, Michael's awareness of music seemed more in tune with nature. Prince, to me, is more mechanical. i don't think a musician is limited to an instrument outside the voice. i believe the voice is as much of an instrument, as a guitar.

It's not. It's not a crime to say some people are better than Mike at something. I'm not a huge Prince fan but it's devastatingly obvious who the better musician is.

Even Michael himself would be so egotistical to claim he was a better musician than Prince.
 
Ahhh Arx! The old 'Anytime, Anyplace' argument!

A good example to use as that's where the balance was right, a beautiful but filthy record.

You think I'm using filthy in a bad sense. I'm not. I don't mind a filthy, dirty record. IF the record is good.

If the record is filthy but shit then the sex become gratuitious. E.g. Janet's Moist. Also, there is a line where it becomes uncomfortable to listen to:

Janet - Warmth

"My hands wrapped around
Stroking up and down
But nothing can compare to
The warmth of my mouth


I love every sound you make
When I'm down
Nothing can prepare you for
The warmth of my


Mouth against your mouth
Getting you aroused
Whisper in your ear
I think I'll take it further south


Kissing on your neck
Rubbing on your leg
Slide a little further up
I feel you get erect


And now we're flesh against flesh
Breathing on your chest
So anxious to touch it
My mouth is getting wet


Just like the water from the shore
Let your rain pour
Baby brace yourself for


My hands wrapped around
Stroking up and down (let's see how long you can last inside)
But nothing can compare to the warmth of my mouth


I love every sound you make
When I'm down (Just hear the water splash about)
But nothing can prepare you for
The warmth of my mouth


No place warmer than my mouth....


Start off slow
Circles
Then deeper and deep it goes
Kisses so sensual
Tasteful
I love giving you a show

Again, if this song was as funky as 'if' then I wouldn't mind. But the coolness, subtlety of 'Anytime, Anyplace' has been (ahem) sucked dry on this piece of pointless, tuneless, dirge created only for shock value.

I see your point about the quality of some of the songs, but she did have a fair amount of sexual songs.

As for the "filth" factor, what I find unfortunate is how (many) people feel uncomfortable with such explicitness. It's definitely a social norm to subdue explicit sexuality, but it doesn't make it right.
 
Hence...

Because all that Prince did by himself was very influential to musicians among his own generation and beyond (with the contemporary soul, funk and electronica acts, let alone pop.)

Therefore...



... he created his own sound, which has everything to do with jazz, rock, folk and the other influences.

I'm a huge Prince fan, have been for many, many years. But I don't believe he created his own sound.

He is an amazing songwriter and is convincing at pulling off almost any genre he puts his mind to, but anybody who thinks he's created his own sound needs to expand their musical horizons a little and they might start to see where he took most of his ideas from. Most of his rock playing is derivitive of Hendrix or Santana.

It's not. It's not a crime to say some people are better than Mike at something. I'm not a huge Prince fan but it's devastatingly obvious who the better musician is.

Even Michael himself would be so egotistical to claim he was a better musician than Prince.

Of course the voice is an instrument. It's ridiculous to say otherwise. People who have an amazing vocal ability and spend hours warming up their vocals to perfect the pitch and tonality are every bit as much a musician as a guitarist or a drummer.
 
I see your point about the quality of some of the songs, but she did have a fair amount of sexual songs.

As for the "filth" factor, what I find unfortunate is how (many) people feel uncomfortable with such explicitness. It's definitely a social norm to subdue explicit sexuality, but it doesn't make it right.

I'm no prude by any stretch of the imagination as you may know but (and maybe this is as a get older) I don't want to hear a song that I cannot play to my son or see a video that is gratuiously sexual or violent.

I know this sounds like I'm saying all pop should be fluffy & lovey dovey, but I'm not. I don't want an anodyne, bland, daren't shock anyone, BBC world. The sex can be there but it doesn't have to be pornography.

I'd have no trouble playing if, Anytime Anyplace, Justify My Love etc to my 9 year old but something like my examples above I'd have the social knocking.
 
Of course the voice is an instrument. It's ridiculous to say otherwise. People who have an amazing vocal ability and spend hours warming up their vocals to perfect the pitch and tonality are every bit as much a musician as a guitarist or a drummer.

Q: What instrument do you play?
A: My throat.

It doesn't work.
 
Most of his rock playing is derivitive of Hendrix or Santana.

And his folk influence is derivative of Joni Mitchell, while his funk influence is derivate of P-Funk among others, but it doesn't mean I'm suggesting he's an inventor in folk music or rock music, or pure funk. I'm talking about the whole package that he created for himself. There is no one individual originator in the arts - everything links back. It's why I always focus more on artists' later influences than their so-called innovations when it comes to talking about their impact.

I'll give you an example of his musician-influence from the so-called sell-out years - the years in which he completely honed his sound. Questlove's explanation of his own drumming influences is really fascinating to me. It's because of him that I realised Prince's great influence on later generations, and also because of him that I really started to appreciate Stevie as a seriously influential drummer.

The first time I came across all this was in a 2005 lecture he gave:


» I think it's strange that probably the three of my biggest influences on drums are not drummers at all, but I consider them to be like the greatest drummers. Stevie Wonder is not by any stretch of the imagination a drummer first. He is a songwriter, piano player, but there is such an intensity and such a passion in his work between the Where I'm Coming From LP of '71 all the way up until I’d say Hotter Than July, before he totally went drum-machine crazy. Eddie Kramer told me this, Eddie Kramer was part of the Talking Book record and the Music Of My Mind album, both were recorded at Electric Lady Studios in New York. And Stevie would sometimes do the tracks individually. He would do the kick and the snare alone, and then he would add the hi-hat later, and then he would add the tom-toms, and the fills, and all that individually by the time. But there is something about his hi-hat work on Music Of My Mind. Back when Tony Williams was a drummer for the Miles Davis Quintett, he was very visual with his cymbal work. Most drummers pick the actual drums to make their mark. But Tony Wiliiams was a cymbal guy, he was very violent, very colorful, and Stevie Wonder took that same approach with his cymbal work. If you listen to the first song of Music Of My Mind, Love Having You Around that's one of the most horrendous, horrible, sloppy hi-hat playing ever. But that should speak to me as a four-year old, (plays air cymbals) 'tch, tch tch', very violent sounding. I became very obsessed with that sound, that violent hi-hat sound. There is only one song in hip hop that is just as violent with hi-hats. If you listen to how the Bomb Squad chopped up Kool & The Gang's Let The Music Take Your Mind, the drum solo for Ice Cube's Amerikkkas Most Wanted. And the way they compress that hi-hat sound, I have been trying to recreate that sound, it is the most stupendous, like crazy sound. But as a hi-hat player Stevie Wonder has definitely influenced what I do on the hi-hat. I don't know why, but I just found myself thinking of him when I'm drumming in the studio. «

» Prince is another non-drummer that was very influential on me. Again, he was very sloppy. His work on the Dirty Mind record, he always pushed the rhythm. Whereas an average drummer would just play a traditional [beatboxes a straight rhythm], he would always push [beatboxes off beat rhythm], it was always off beat. But I was obsessed with being off beat, off rhythm. I don't know why because of the human touch or whatever. Not to mention he is definitely one of the pioneers of really good drum programming. Even though Herbie Hancock had one of the first Linn Drums for his work, and of course, the Talking Heads, David Byrne did a lot of work with computerized drums, but I definitely know that Prince had one of the first models, he still has it in the studio. When we did the Electric Circus record Prince graciously let us use Paisley Park for a few sessions. I went in the basement and sure enough all this stuff is still intact, and we used some of the stuff. But I didn't know that that was a drum-machine because his programming was so syncopated, I was thinking that just one drummer played all his stuff. So for two years straight I would think if he took 777-9311, a song that has a very complex, near Weather Report-ish hi-hat pattern, that no human being can really do. «


Questo, two years later, gave an interview to Touré in Icon magazine about how Prince's late-80s albums were the most influential to his generation and the Soulquarian and Okayplayer scenes. I'll go dig it up.
 
In that case I was wrong, sorry.

No need for apologies, but you are wrong.

Try telling Luciano Pavarotti that the voice isn't an instrument. Okay, he's dead so that didn't really work, but you know what I mean....
 
And his folk influence is derivative of Joni Mitchell, while his funk influence is derivate of P-Funk among others, but it doesn't mean I'm suggesting he's an inventor in folk music or rock music, or pure funk. I'm talking about the whole package that he created for himself. There is no one individual originator in the arts - everything links back. It's why I always focus more on artists' later influences than their so-called innovations when it comes to talking about their impact.

There's a difference between being infuenced and being derivitive. Guns N Roses are influenced by Aerosmith but they are in no way derivitive. Lenny Kravtiz on the other hand is merely dressing up pretending to be Hendrix and failing miserably. He is the dictionary definition of "dervitive".

Sometimes Prince seems so eager to show off how versatile he is that he sounds very derivitive.
 
No need for apologies, but you are wrong.

Try telling Luciano Pavarotti that the voice isn't an instrument. Okay, he's dead so that didn't really work, but you know what I mean....

Ha! But surely Pavarotti was a singer, not a musician?

I'm sure he'd agree if he chucked in his two-penceworth, or in his case tenor.
 
Questo, two years later, gave an interview to Touré in Icon magazine about how Prince's late-80s albums were the most influential to his generation and the Soulquarian and Okayplayer scenes. I'll go dig it up.

I couldn't find the article anywhere on the net, but I dug it up from my copy of Touré's Never Drank The Kool-Aid essays book. Questlove is referred to by his name, Ahmir, here.

From Icon Magazine, July 1998:


After Purple Rain he continued making great music—journalist Anthony DeCurtis said, “Between ‘82 [1999] and 87 [Sign of The Times] he was in the zone. It was that moment when the Zeitgeist flows through you and as it moves through you you’re shaping where it goes once it passes you. He was channeling, man.”

Sign of The Times was a towering zenith. After a two quirky, but brilliant records—1985’s Around the World In A Day, 1986’s Parade—Sign was a critical watershed that remains the favorite Prince album for many musicians and non-musicians. “His best album to me is Sign of the Times,” said Ahmir. “That’s his look-ma-no-hands record. No one but him would put that coda at the end of “U Got the Look.” No one but him would use the method called vary speed which, thus, you get the Camille sounding voice. Basically it’s just him singing with the tape slowed down. That’s some sick shit. No one but him would omit the hi-hat in “It.” No one but him would put backward drums on “Starfish and Coffee.” No one but him would write a song like “Starfish and Coffee!” And put that shit six on his record! Artists today put all their eccentric shit way towards the end cuz they’re all worried about makin sure the first six songs are absolute bangers. Meanwhile, he covers the whole spectrum of music in the first four songs. He covered Santana, James Brown, Curtis Mayfield—just as far as styles—Joni Mitchell, Pink Floyd, all within the first five songs. No one does epic shit like he does. I consider that an unbelievable record.”
 
It's not. It's not a crime to say some people are better than Mike at something. I'm not a huge Prince fan but it's devastatingly obvious who the better musician is.

Even Michael himself would be so egotistical to claim he was a better musician than Prince.
Mike did make a comment once about Paul McCartney being able to play all the instruments in the studio, and he (MJ) couldn't.
 
Mike did make a comment once about Paul McCartney being able to play all the instruments in the studio, and he (MJ) couldn't.

Just realised that should say "Even Michael himself wouldn't be so egotistical to claim he was a better musician than Prince"!
 
I don't think Madonna is all that great. I like a few of her songs, but I still think that she is overrated.

I liked Madonna more in the 80's and I hate how she dresses and acts, put your damn clothes on and btw I feel this way about most female artists who decide to dress like hookers.
 
Great thread!

Don't agree at all that U2 are overrated. U2's great music is too often forgotten. "Running To Stand Still" on The Joshua Tree is one of my favourite songs.
Kanye West's music is underrated. His personality may leave a lot to be desired, but the man is talented.
Beyoncé is massively overrated as a credible artist.
The Grammy Awards have zero credibility.
Lady Gaga's shock tactics are wearing thin. They are beginning to outshine her talent and songs.
Shows like The X Factor and American Idol are poisoning the music industry.
"Thriller" is not Michael Jackson's best album.
 
Another: John Mayer is too often dismissed as a "pop star." He is a hugely talented guitarist, singer and songwriter.
 
Great thread!

Don't agree at all that U2 are overrated. U2's great music is too often forgotten. "Running To Stand Still" on The Joshua Tree is one of my favourite songs.
Kanye West's music is underrated. His personality may leave a lot to be desired, but the man is talented.
Beyoncé is massively overrated as a credible artist.
The Grammy Awards have zero credibility.
Lady Gaga's shock tactics are wearing thin. They are beginning to outshine her talent and songs.
Shows like The X Factor and American Idol are poisoning the music industry.
"Thriller" is not Michael Jackson's best album.

I agree with this especially the part about Kanye..Kanye is the best artist of this generation HANDS DOWN..he would have to be one of the very few artists who are consistant when it comes to their music!! I think him being controversial overshadows his artistry..In my opinion, Kanye is a freakin GENIUS!!

Lady Gaga's costumes overshadow who she is an artist/entertainer..she is talented, but I think the wierdness overshadows that..Maybe if she stopped trying to be so different..I would change my mind about her..

I think Beyonce is a better performer than she is an artist..I think her performance skills overshadow her music..If she was a better composer and songwriter (Also, wrote & produce songs by herself), I would put her up there with the legends..I would have more respect for her..
 
Last edited:
DirtyDianaMJ☆;2784002 said:
I think Beyonce is a better performer than she is an artist..I think her performance skills overshadow her music..If she was a better composer and songwriter (Also, wrote & produce songs by herself), I would put her up there with the legends..I would have more respect for her..

How does the fact that her performances are better that her music suddenly put her up to par with legends??? Shes a very average performer that copies other performances and entertainers. I will never understand the hype around her as a performer or as an artist she does absolutely nothing..
 
Back
Top