MJJuniorSinceMW
Proud Member
I just hope that when all these tracks are 'modernised' and put on the album they include the original versions.
A double cd set would be a dream! The album updated on one disc the OG versions on the other.
I just hope that when all these tracks are 'modernised' and put on the album they include the original versions.
I agree the Estate wants to make money of coarse, i mean they paid over 250 million for the material, however i do think that Michaels untouched demos should be released too. If it were up to me, i'd release the Timberland produced album, then release a "special edition" of the album with MJ's untouched demos.
A double cd set would be a dream! The album updated on one disc the OG versions on the other.
I just hope that when all these tracks are 'modernised' and put on the album they include the original versions.
And don't ad lib throughout it.
Now look who's making assumptions. Can't we all just wait and see?I wish it was just a given that the originals came with the remakes. But Timbaland did say Michael Jackson had lost it after leaving Quincy yet he wants to work on songs (probably) recorded after Bad. Ladies and Gentlemen, "Michael 2" releases this december.
Clearly a Timbaland fan. The dude has spoken ill about MJ, no assumption about it. I made no assumption anywhere, just simply commented on what he'd said. The 'Michael 2' comment was in reference to the crap we're hearing recently; meaning another bad album. chill.Now look who's making assumptions. Can't we all just wait and see?
I like a few Timbaland tracks and I liked Timberlake's tracks with the exception of Timberlake's voice so this could go well. 8 albums worth? That'd be nice if it's true. As others said, simultaneous release of demos would be amazing.
No I'm not a Timbaland fan. Way to make another assumption How is it not presumptuous to think the album will be as bad as "Michael" just because you don't like what you've heard from the producer? And if it's about whether or not the producer respected MJ's work, look at Teddy Riley's work on "Michael". Chill? How am I not chill?Clearly a Timbaland fan. The dude has spoken ill about MJ, no assumption about it. I made no assumption anywhere, just simply commented on what he'd said. The 'Michael 2' comment was in reference to the crap we're hearing recently; meaning another bad album. chill.
if timbaland produced Timberlake's Mirrors, i apologise! i love that song, don't want it to be 8 minutes though, haha
Personally I'd be happy if Timberland is working on some MJ music because he knows how to produce a hit.
I know that will go against the grain in the MJ fan community but that's the way it is.
Mj's untouched and uncompleted music will never produce hit records or future commercial success for MJ in their current form. They need to be reworked to make them more appealing to the wider audience.
Some fans don't want commercial appeal. They don't want chart success. They don't want anybody to touch the material left by MJ. BUT the MJ Estate is here to make money and MJ loved chart success. I'm sure he would agree with any new album or single that put him at the top of the charts, especially if they became MASSIVE (i.e. successful for longer than a few weeks).
The incorporation of Bieber onto STTR is questionnable considering there were seemingly complete MJ vocals to work with, but the production of that song had to change to make it hit-worthy. Many fans liked the 2010 version produced by Tricky, and that was almost certainly much different to the version MJ worked on.
Some people only want people who worked with MJ to work on his unreleased material, but that may be a red herring. Sure, MJ may have worked with Teddy Riley and others in the past but they may not finish a song in the way MJ would have liked. In fact I'm pretty sure that some of the songs on the 'Michael' album proved that to be the case.
The Estate need to find the right producers and not limit themselves to the ones MJ worked with.
TImberland may have criticised MJ's later music, and many many people would agree with him, but that doesn't mean that he's a bad choice. In fact, it could mean he's a good choice. Many people around the world believe that MJ's best albums were those produced by Quincy. Personally, even though my favourite albums are Dangerous and HISTory, I had wanted MJ to go back to that Off The Wall sound to recapture some of that magic that sucked people in in the late 70s and early 80s. I wanted Vince to be more like OTW, and was hoping the same for any future album. In my head I know that wouldn't have happened because (IMO) MJ lost his way, but if Timberland can produce something that sounds a little like Off The Wall then the album could be huge. It's a very cool sound right now. Even if his material doesn't sound like OTW he has the ability to create something that will be played by radio.
MJ fans need to stop trying to destroy future MJ products IMO.
They claim to be protecting MJ's legacy but MJ loved success. MJ would have loved the idea of posthumous albums selling millions upon millions and being number 1 around the world. To think otherwise is ridiculous.
A double cd set would be a dream! The album updated on one disc the OG versions on the other.
Haha, so true. In 2010, wasn't it Rodney Jerkins saying something and Dr. Freeze was saying A Place Without No Name was assured in the next album after Michael.Dont know if i should belive timbaland or not as there are has been so many people saying "we will bring out new mj song" but they never do.
No I'm not a Timbaland fan. Way to make another assumption How is it not presumptuous to think the album will be as bad as "Michael" just because you don't like what you've heard from the producer? And if it's about whether or not the producer respected MJ's work, look at Teddy Riley's work on "Michael". Chill? How am I not chill?
The album looks like if Timbaland is on it, it will be the Michael album again. NOTHING like Michael's vision. If you're having Michael's vision, why is Timbaland on it? They would use him for a contemporary sounding album something the Michael album tried to be. So it will be like Michael if they are using people like Timbo on it. Nothing against his work at all, but he shouldn't be anywhere near MJ's stuff because he didn't work on it when it was done originally. If true, why take a massive step backwards from Bad 25?
Hold on, Hold on! Chill. We already have the full Michael version. We are quick to judge others, but when it comes to MJ everything is wrong and must be clarified. We have NO idea what the Estate/Sony are doing. This could be a 2CD duet album where one disc is duets and the other is original versions. But if they release a single from that, who the f*** cares? It's about time people started taking Justin Bieber seriously, he is not the 16 year old who sang Baby anymore. Do you think people threw ABC at Michael Jackson all the time? No. he was given time to mature and that is what JB is doing now. Maybe he will get there (obv not MJ level, come on.)
Whilst people may not like what I've said because he's a "gay 19 year old who spits on fans etc etc" we need to grow up really. It is not "blasphemy" nor is it an "insult". It is simply making these songs more attractive to more markets = $$$$. If his own family are only doing things for money, then why shouldn't the people who it's their job to get money from him? We already have the full Michael Jackson version anyways, so y'know.. chill.
I'm confused. You seemed so supportive of the Bieber "duet", but you don't like the idea of Timbaland? Let me quote you from the Bieber thread:
I'm neutral on Timbaland as long as I don't hear his work on MJ's music. We have heard Bieber and I don't like it.