Imo randy is a major contributor to what happened how an adult would put up with his disgusting ways i dont know let alone a child that before was loved and protected. that man is vicious and vile and is damaging those children with his nastyness and obsession eith breaking them
.
I hope prince also seek consultant, what bothered Paris are also what prince experienced. He is the oldest and has gone through so much. It will take the huge toll on the strong adult and he is just a kid. His sister, the closest to him, grown up together, tried to end her life, he is the one hurt most. But now his so called family 'insider' blamed this on him to do the damage control, it's never the family's fault. How will prince feel when he read it? The judge needs to do the investigation on all Michael's children. Do not wait for another tragedy to happen to take the action. I am seriously concern over all Michael's children.
Apparently, still at the hospital. We don't know how she is, since all we see are articles commenting on her reasons, and not how she is now.How's Paris now?
I remember Paris answering that kind of comments on twitter a few yers ago. People were telling her she was not black, and couldn't be Michael's biological daughter.As an African American I wasn't offended by Debbie's comments at all because many of the black people who have attacked her are using racism themselves. I've heard the comments on black radio talking about the white Jackson's vs the black Jackson's in reference to Michael's kids. It's wrong but it's not called out and stopped.
What is scary is that if Randy could give these types of lies to X17, it stands to reason that these thoughts are in his mind and he could have voiced them in the house. We don't know what things the children overheard Randy and siblings saying about them. Randy is blaming Prince; really this is an adult attacking a child. I strongly believe that Randy and maybe some or all the siblings believe that these children are not Michael's and are not entitled to Michael's money.
Does anyone remember that message from I think Anthony which was posted during granny gate, in which Anthony was telling Paris something about her money and she should listen to him? Are certain family members always bringing up the children's money, and do the children feel completely comfortable in their home?
Right now Paris is doing ok and family is visiting, so it seems that she really needs some LOVE. It must be a harsh change to be living with Michael who likes constant hugs and is not shy to say I Love You, and then being thrust into a group of people with Randy in it.
What does Randy do for a living apart from selling stories?
I'm sorry saying that she is human or she loved a black man is no excuse for what she did today. I'm sure she loved that black man's money as well case in point when her deal was being running out all of the sudden she wanted the kids. She assumed that the person who was attacking her was black. At her age arguing on Twitter is childish and she should know better
What does Randy do for a living apart from selling stories?
On another note, I'm aware Michael wasn't always happy with Debbie, but I just don't see him telling the kids "horrible" things about her. Do you guys see him doing that? It's one thing if he thought bad things about her to himself, but to actually tell horrible things about her to the children is another thing.
Then there is Debbie, who allows her niece to contact TMZ to offer photos & then Debbie posts several photos of her child on facebook when she knows several people are passing the photos around. The big question is does Paris care about the photos being all over the place? Maybe not, so this may not be a problem.
The woman even told Michael "look I'm giving you these children but I don't want to be with them" and he's like "okay". NOW she wants to be the mother. Michael was mother and a father to those kids she "gave" him so she can go somewhere with that...
[
Although reports have surfaced that child-welfare services is investigating the teen's home in light of recent events, DCFS has refused to confirm whether or not it is involved with the Paris Jackson situation, telling E! News in a statement Friday they are "legally prohibited" from disclosing any information related to specific cases.
*Dr. Charles Sophy, medical director of DCFS, gave his take on the situation, telling E! News that his agency usually doesn't get involved in a case like this unless "someone called the child abuse hotline."
"We at the Department of Children and Family Services will never respond unless we have a call that rises to the level of suspicion of abuse or neglect," Dr. Sophy said. "Because there's a suicide attempt in a family does not necessarily mean we will be there."
About Debbie: If that is her ranting she has a right to do so. How would you feel if a bunch of strange people keep tweeting you hurtful things. Someone told her she sold a child out and she responds she did not have slaves. She is right, since selling a child is akin to having slaves and selling them. Then the ebonics: I have read posts here which in my mind I label as ebonics and I do not follow it fully. They are usually a long paragraph with no punctuation, and half of words & slangs. Now if some strangers keep tweeting me & pissing me off with writing like that, I would make the same comments too. Anyone who tries to challenge a grown woman who you already know has a hot temper, with a sharp tongue deserves what they get. She is going to fight back at you and hurt you where she thinks it will do the most damage. If you can't take it, stay away. It is the same thing I do when I say something in a post and someone PMs me to challenge me. Since the PM is private, I will let you have it because I am not being governed by the rules on the open board. It is Debbie's twitter and the person made the decision to contact her on her turf. I expect some think she should read what others tweet her and should be the angel/grown up and say kind words back or block them. Then, shouldn't those contacting her be grown up/angels too and tweet her in a more lovable way.
Right now both Debbie and the Jacksons seem as unsuitable guardians to me. Michael knew his mother's priorities, but maybe he had few choices. He also did not expect to die so young, so now the children have one guardian whose days are occupied with making money off Michel's death, and another guardian who has his own family to take care of. Then there is Debbie, who allows her niece to contact TMZ to offer photos & then Debbie posts several photos of her child on facebook when she knows several people are passing the photos around. The big question is does Paris care about the photos being all over the place? Maybe not, so this may not be a problem.
Hopefully there will be no more public tragedies from that house involving those children. Maybe this time the judge will have more strict guidelines.
I absolutely agree with you take on Debbies replies.
I don't know the reason about her niece contacting on TMZ (of all tabloids:bugeyed) but about her posting photos of Paris on her facebook, isnt that what all the proud mothers do?
Does anyone remember that message from I think Anthony which was posted during granny gate, in which Anthony was telling Paris something about her money and she should listen to him? Are certain family members always bringing up the children's money, and do the children feel completely comfortable in their home?
During granny gate there were comments that Paris should keep the family business private & not go on twitter asking for granny. Then in the last interview she says that she got into trouble because she was tweeting the family business.
Anthony is anti Estate so his tweets from last year when he wrote about money was about the Estate trying to get their hands on her money. He was tweeting her that the will is fake because MJ showed him the real will (and Paris wrote back "ur saying things ppl already know tho..."). He was basically saying he was kept away from the kids and Katherine because he knew the truth re the will.
Pace said:It wasn't like i went by my self i went with family but yeh from seeing the dangerous tour on tv a few years prior to the history tour i was worried the crowd situation was gonna be like that but thankfully it wasnt. It wasnt sqaushed up with everyone in the crowd so it was safe for ppl of all ages
It does not have effect me personally. Her comments were just wrong. As an African-American I found them distasteful. I don't like anyone telling how I should feel about it
jamba;3840763 said:About KJ being passive--yes and no. I was surprised to read in Moonwalk that she rehearsed the J5 at times, this is being pretty actively involved. Here's what MJ says:
"Even on the occasions when Mom led our after-school rehearsals b/c Dad hadn't come home from his shift on time, it was still like having him there b/c she acted as his eyes and ears. She always knew what had been good the night before and what had gotten sloppy today. Dad would pick it up from there at night. It seemed to me that they almost gave each other signals or something--Dad could always tell if we had been playing like we were supposed to by some invisible indication from Mom." (Chapter One, Just Kids with a Dream, page 58).
Also I think it's pretty agreed that she was the one who suggested putting MJ in the group that was formed of the 4 brothers, but no one was interested til they heard him sing at the school performance and saw how he got a standing ovation (at age 5). I think she was more active than is realized in the formation and evolution of J5.
Re KJ needs to tell Randy to do this, or whoever to do whatever, maybe MJ was right when he sang, "Mother preaching Abraham, brothers they don't give a damn." Meaning, they don't listen to her. As Billy Bush said, there is a lack of leadership, no one in charge.
Moonwalk also talks about Rebbie filling in for KJ, esp. when she went to night school to get her diploma. "She always ran things when Mom was at night school finishing the high school diploma she was denied b/c of her illness." MJ writes, "Rebbie's life was never easy as the oldest." (same chapter, p. 57)
Seemingly what Debbie did seems to be a sore spot to some people as it was quite unusual thing to do for a woman, but it was her decision, her body and her life. There have been tons of untrue reports on MJ, and it is possible that there are untrue reports on Debbie too, therefore I'm willing to give her benefit of doubt.
She may have changed her mind about being mother, and you know what, she can do that and if kids or just Paris wants to see her , they should not be made feel quilty about it.
All proud mother's children are not targeted and dissected by tabloids all the time. Whether we would like to accept it or not, these kids are not average kids and so their activities on social media don't have average consequences. I understand if Paris doesn't understand that yet, she's a kid, but Debbie should know better. There's absolutely no need for her to publicize their bonding and publish pics of Paris and herself on social meda, nor any need of tipping off the tabloid media about whatever they do together.
I can't criticize the Jacksons for leaking info about the kids to tabloids then turn around and excuse Debbie and/or her family and friends for the same.