Jamba that pissed me off too. then when she wrote how he was loved by his kids but it was too late, and the part about the curious circumstances, I saw red. It seems she sits on a high pedestal and looks down and judges. Then she begins her rant with a focus on beauty and superficial nonsense and trivializes this very tragic situation. Yes, I know she wants to show that some will think that what Paris has would make every girl happy. However, I really don't want to hear that now, especially since she did not give any serious thought to the possible causes of teen suicide. I am not up with the scholarly publications on teen suicide, but I would think most teen suicide is not due to wanting the beauty of another. Her whole article was a kick in the butt to Michael, and seriously myotosis I don't know why you wrote that someone pointed out that the second article you posted was better. To me they are in the same "bad group."
Please can we have an article where someone puts this tragedy in the proper social context and gives it the serious analysis that it needs--something like the Billy Bush comment, but more meat to it.
Now I see the later articles are now focusing on Michael's death as a cause, (because they are all ignoring the big silver elephant in the room) but why nothing happened in 2010, 11, 12. I would think the 1st year anniversary of the death would be the breaking point, or father's day, Christmas, or the first major holiday in which Michael did something special with the kids. I noticed that one of my clients lost her mom and grandmother last September & October, and when I went to her home on the Monday after Mother's day this year, she was crying and grief stricken. In fact the week before mother's day she started the crying, telling me stories about them, and getting depressed.