Open General discussion - Katherine Jackson vs AEG

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, in hindsight they should have given additional money. But back then it seems Phillips was not willing to give another million in advance when MJ's manager asked regarding Klein's bills.

They were going to pay Murray anyway, whether through a cash advance or an AEG-Murray contract. That would not have changed AEG's financial situation.

And Michael asked for Murray in May, Phillips refused the extra million on june 20th, when he thought there was a risk of "anticipatory breach", that would have been the shows not happening. Phillips was afraid of AEG losing money at that point. The situation, or better said, the way Phillips saw it completely changed between beginning of may and end of june.
For example, AEG went well over the production costs limits they had set, and with no signature. They were certainly not worried whan they did that.

And that didn't stop Jorrie to send another contract to Murray on june 24th.
 
Last edited:
But he's saying MJ should not have been allowed to bring his own doctor in the first place.....
yes, I know, I said I did not agree with that...

Edit, sorry I realise that I might not have been clear : I can partially agree with him considering they saw Murray was not doing a good job.
And I can't agree with AEG getting involved with Murray through an AEG-Murray contract.
 
This expert definitely was trying too hard at times contradicting himself. That's why he's getting paid I guess

yes he was trying to hard and apparently almost nothing removes the conflict

Bina: What if AEG just fronts $34 million?
Dr. Matheson: Dr. Conrad Murray would be still conflicted
"Dr. Murray would still be beholden to AEG," Dr. Matheson opined.


So according to him even advancing the money is not enough and Murray still be beholden to AEG. I mean why? the $34 Million would be Michael's problem and as the money was already given Murray could warn AEG about Michael's health. In my opinion his only conflict in that situation would be with Michael, assuming Murray though Michael could not perform and Michael wanted to perform.


Bina: The only way to structure a deal would be to give $1.5 million up front?
Dr. Matheson: Should structure deal so termination and cancellation are not incorporated in deal


so according to him the only way to overcome conflict is to give Murray $1.5 Million up front with a contract that had no consequences of termination / cancellation of tour. Murray would get the $1.5 Million no matter what. Sure that makes it easier for Murray to get his money and say "naah he can't perform" with nothing to lose. But as I asked before, how realistic is such contract / payment? Who does that?

edited to add: Last night on twitter I said if I was doing the cross I would hypothetically ask how much money would make Dr. Matheson overlook his oath? Or even ask if he was given $1.5 Million would he give Propofol. Assuming he would deny it, it would be a good presentation of such unethical actions are dependent on the person. Sure, money could be a temptation but ethical people can overlook money.

There was a story some time ago. A woman gives some money to a homeless man and in the process she drops her wedding ring (worth thousands of dollars) to his collection cup without realizing. the homeless man takes the ring to the police department. So from ethical / conflict perspective this homeless man has all the motivation in the world to sell that ring and use the money but his not having any money did not stop him from doing the right thing.
 
yes he was trying to hard and apparently almost nothing removes the conflict

Bina: What if AEG just fronts $34 million?
Dr. Matheson: Dr. Conrad Murray would be still conflicted
"Dr. Murray would still be beholden to AEG," Dr. Matheson opined.


So according to him even advancing the money is not enough and Murray still be beholden to AEG. I mean why? the $34 Million would be Michael's problem and as the money was already given Murray could warn AEG about Michael's health. In my opinion his only conflict in that situation would be with Michael, assuming Murray though Michael could not perform and Michael wanted to perform.


Bina: The only way to structure a deal would be to give $1.5 million up front?
Dr. Matheson: Should structure deal so termination and cancellation are not incorporated in deal


so according to him the only way to overcome conflict is to give Murray $1.5 Million up front with a contract that had no consequences of termination / cancellation of tour. Murray would get the $1.5 Million no matter what. Sure that makes it easier for Murray to get his money and say "naah he can't perform" with nothing to lose. But as I asked before, how realistic is such contract / payment? Who does that?

A mess. No scenario was good enough for this expert. Trying hard alright.
 
I agree Matheson did not make sense at all from a number of perspectives. He is a sports contract expert, from what I gathered, yet sports is rife with conflict of interest between the triangulation of doctor-player-management!!! Look at football players--how long have they had serious concussions and yet were sent back into the game--how long did it take before they were even required to wear HELMETS? Isn't it a notorious fact that players were sent back out on the field before they had time to heal from their concussions,leading to permanent swelling of the brain, that has killed players recently or they have committed suicide b/c they can't take the pain or the loss of their mental abilities? I mean sports is an area that is so full of conflict of interest to this very day and yet he is saying that AEG set up CM with a conflict of interest by agreeing to bring him 'on board' as the tour doctor. In his view there should have been 'a team' of doctors looking after MJ--who has a team? And does this make sense to say one doctor is a problem on tour, so let's bring in a team of doctors on tour??? Ye gods!

Unles Matheson is willing to say the entire sports industry has a conflict of interest situation with the player-doctor-management triangulation, IMO he has no basis for calling out AEG-CM-MJ.

The other point is AEG TRIED to say no to MJ re CM, they wanted a doctor in the UK, but MJ was adamant. RP testified that he called MJ to recommend getting a UK doctor and MJ was not having it--he said it was a 'tense conversation.' So Matheson is saying at that point AEG should have refused anyway. Contractually, was this an option? Maybe it was, but I am not sure if they had the right to prevent MJ from choosing CM. Maybe they could have refused to front the $--but again we are looking at massive HINDSIGHT. How could they have foreseen the consequences knowing what they knew at the time??

What is this guy really saying? Who was supposed to hire the 'team' of doctors to take care of MJ??
 
I don't get it.

It assumes that everyone will do everything for money. Forget about person's own ethics and the oath and doing the right thing. Ignore all the other doctors that said no. (I'm pretty sure for example Nurse Lee isn't a millionaire and could use some money).

And if we assume Murray is the kind of person who would do anything for money, the conflict doesn't get removed even if you remove AEG completely. Imagine Michael hired Murray with his own money - not even used AEG advance - Murray's incentive would still be to keep his job and receive payments. I would imagine he would be conflicted to do anything that would make him lose his job - such as saying no to Michael.

then comes the odd scenarios of give murray money up front with no termination or hire a team of people ( I guess assuming one of them will do the right thing?).

and even AEG saying "no you can't rehearse or get on stage until you are evaluated by other doctors" could be a breach of contract by AEG. I wonder if they did such thing and if Michael was alive, could that action be enough for a breach of contract lawsuit from Michael against AEG ? Could he for example claim " I was ready and able and they did not allow me on stage" ?

and I'm curious about how team doctors hired. how is the conflict in sports is removed?
 
That's interesting.

I remember seeing an interview with Frank DiLeo, where he said he tried to dissuade Michael about hiring Murray. Didn't Phillips say that too ?

Frank is not AEG, he was Michael's manager.

But that doesn't change the fact that the decsion to do an independant contractor contract to Murray came from AEG, or they agreed to it. They still could have made another advance instead of paying him. They were giving the money anyway.


Frank Dileo didn't have a problem with Conrad Murray, because of the specialty of the doctor, cardiologist. Frank Dileo was fine with that!
 
^^

people keep omitting that Murray was also an internal medicine doctor - many of which can act as a family practitioner / general care doctor


Internists are equipped to deal with whatever problem a patient brings -- no matter how common or rare, or how simple or complex. They are specially trained to solve puzzling diagnostic problems and can handle severe chronic illnesses and situations where several different illnesses may strike at the same time. They also bring to patients an understanding of wellness (disease prevention and the promotion of health), women's health, substance abuse, mental health, as well as effective treatment of common problems of the eyes, ears, skin, nervous system and reproductive organs.

Internists can choose to focus their practice on general internal medicine, or may take additional training to "subspecialize" in one of 13 areas of internal medicine. Cardiologists, for example, are doctors of internal medicine who subspecialize in diseases of the heart. The training an internist receives to subspecialize in a particular medical area is both broad and deep. Subspecialty training (often called a "fellowship") usually requires an additional one to three years beyond the standard three year general internal medicine residency.

so as you can see Murray is an internal medicine doctor with sub specialization of cardiology
 
Right.. Murray specialized in cardiology but he was an internal medicine doctor.
 
Bina: What if AEG just fronts $34 million?
Dr. Matheson: Dr. Conrad Murray would be still conflicted
"Dr. Murray would still be beholden to AEG," Dr. Matheson opined.
I agree. I just feel the whole aeg deal was a massive conflict of interest and detrimental to mj. I know it was mj's poor financial situation that necessitated these circumstances but unlike some of you that seem to see it as aeg being benign and helpful and that it was nothing out of the ordinary, i just see it as exploitative for mj. Aeg was paying for absolutely everything - not just the tour but everything in mj's life, settling the lawsuits, his home, his nanny, his doctor, his bills, his staff. That gives power in a relationship, 'he who pays the piper, calls the tune', and coupled with the disrespect and disdain for mj evident in the emails, for me it just paints a toxic, unhealthy picture of their business 'partnership'. I feel mj was purposely 'locked in' to this tii tour and he had no one, no doctor or manager, that had the independence to suggest to him that it might not be the best course of action. The only one who even broached the subject, ortega, seems to have been seen as a drama queen.
 
ABC7 Court News ?@ABC7Courts 26m
Lots of media and fans present today. Our report Miriam Hernandez is in de courtroom. We are in the overflow room as well.
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
ABC7 Court News ?@ABC7Courts 29m
Prince Jackson is already in the courthouse. He's wearing a suit and tie.
Expand
ABC7 Court News ?@ABC7Courts 31m
Good Morning from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 38 of Jackson family vs AEG trial to begin shortly.

---------------------------------

Alan Duke ?@AlanDukeCNN 3m
Several MJ fans started crying as they watched Prince Jackson walk from the elevator into the court.
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
Alan Duke ?@AlanDukeCNN 18m
Prince Jackson arrives at court wearing suit & tie, with grandmom Katherine, co-guardian TJ. Testimony starts in 10 minutes.

-----------------------------------

Anthony McCartney ?@mccartneyAP 16m
Prince Jackson has arrived for his testimony. This link will update once I'm able to file: http://yhoo.it/14xsz8E
Heading into court soon.
View summary Reply Retweet Favorite More
Anthony McCartney ?@mccartneyAP 26m
I'll be in the courtroom and will post updates when possible. Just so everyone's clear, I cannot tweet from inside the courtroom.
Expand
Anthony McCartney ?@mccartneyAP 27m
Prince Jackson has arrived at the LA court
 
ivy;3854807 said:
I don't get it.


and even AEG saying "no you can't rehearse or get on stage until you are evaluated by other doctors" could be a breach of contract by AEG. I wonder if they did such thing and if Michael was alive, could that action be enough for a breach of contract lawsuit from Michael against AEG ? Could he for example claim " I was ready and able and they did not allow me on stage" ?

and I'm curious about how team doctors hired. how is the conflict in sports is removed?

With the emails Philips received on the 19th, no problem at all, IMO.

On our medical board, they do have templates for various contracts for doctors, including sports team. I read one of those on the French board a while ago, it had stuff regarding the patient-doctor priviledge info, & acting in the best interest of the player instead of the team. I don't have the time right, now, but it maybe the California board does the same thing ?

jamba;3854780 said:
The other point is AEG TRIED to say no to MJ re CM, they wanted a doctor in the UK, but MJ was adamant. RP testified that he called MJ to recommend getting a UK doctor and MJ was not having it--he said it was a 'tense conversation.' So Matheson is saying at that point AEG should have refused anyway. Contractually, was this an option? Maybe it was, but I am not sure if they had the right to prevent MJ from choosing CM. Maybe they could have refused to front the $--but again we are looking at massive HINDSIGHT. How could they have foreseen the consequences knowing what they knew at the time??

What is this guy really saying? Who was supposed to hire the 'team' of doctors to take care of MJ??

Contractually they could have refused. They are concert promoters, not a bank. But I don't think that at the beginning, in May, they had a reason to refuse, apart from the cost.

Can they prevent Michael from choosing his doctor : No, they can't.

So either they give him an adavance, or just say no.

But choosing to do an AEG-Murray contract was the worst possible option, and treating Murray as a tour employee was again à very bad choice.
 
Aeg was paying for absolutely everything - not just the tour but everything in mj's life, settling the lawsuits, his home, his nanny, his doctor, his bills, his staff. That gives power in a relationship,

actually the claim about this was dismissed by the judge. Although you are right about the nature of the relationship, it wasn't a control as very simply put Michael had the choice of walking away.

for example your salary can help you pay for your house, car, food etc.. hence you might need your job to survive but the salary doesn't give your employer any power over you. You have the option to quit, look for a new job, be unemployed and even go bankrupt.
 
Stories in the news thread about Prince are putrid. Like AEG does not already know what Prince is going to say. Did they not depose him not too long ago and didn't the Jackson's lawyers bitch about it?
 
Stories in the news thread about Prince are putrid. Like AEG does not already know what Prince is going to say. Did they not depose him not too long ago and didn't the Jackson's lawyers bitch about it?

Im sorry I don't understand your post. Do you mean a particular story? And you do realise that the Jackson side have put him on the stand.
 
bouee;3854847 said:
With the emails Philips received on the 19th, no problem at all, IMO.

On our medical board, they do have templates for various contracts for doctors, including sports team. I read one of those on the French board a while ago, it had stuff regarding the patient-doctor priviledge info, & acting in the best interest of the player instead of the team. I don't have the time right, now, but it maybe the California board does the same thing ?



Contractually they could have refused. They are concert promoters, not a bank. But I don't think that at the beginning, in May, they had a reason to refuse, apart from the cost.

Can they prevent Michael from choosing his doctor : No, they can't.

So either they give him an adavance, or just say no.

But choosing to do an AEG-Murray contract was the worst possible option, and treating Murray as a tour employee was again à very bad choice.

We are back to square one. Yes, in hindsight the contract aeg-murray--mj was not a good idea but ONLY b/c it made AEG liable for this lawsuit. What you are saying is that AEG could have/should have protected themselves better. However, that has nothing to do with CM's agreement with MJ for propofol to be administered--b/c there is no evidence that AEG knew about it or in any way encouraged/promoted that CM use that 'remedy' for insomnia. And it really has IMO nothing to do with MJ's death b/c as long as Murray was administering propofol the way he was MJ was set for a disaster.

I think Nurse Lee possibly needs more attention here--why is she not a witness? This is weird to me b/c supposedly MJ asked her for propofol in April AFTER CM had already ordered it (April 6). She refused to help him find a doctor to give propofol and says she tried to talk him out of it (Metzger also says MJ told him he needed IV treatment for insomnia b/c oral meds didn't work, but M says the word propofol did not come up and he thought it was other IV sleep meds MJ referred to). Nurse Lee went on a huge # of TV shows--Larry King, CNN (3 times), Greta VS, CBS, and more. WHY?

Here is Metzger's testimony:


Dr. Allan Metzger’s testimony on October 24, 2011
(I am starting my transcript when it comes to the medical meeting between Michael Jackson
and Dr. Metzger on April 18, 2009)
CHERNOFF (lead defense attorney): Was it unusual for you to visit Michael Jackson’s
house?
DR. ALLAN METZGER: Not unusual, but infrequent.
C: Did he explain you at any point when he called you why he wanted you to come to his
house?
AM: Basically he said “I want to talk to you about some health issues” and he has known the
I’ve been checking up the kids and knew that I really wanted to see the kids.
C: What was when you came to the house? Who was there?
AM; The three children, Michael, some security guards that I don’t recall names of the
moment. Grace was not there. I don’t know who else was in the home.
C: At the time Michael Jackson spoke to you, did he tell you that he was seeing any other
doctors?
AM: No.
C: And the conversation that you ad with him – was it a private conversation or were there
individuals around when you had this talk?
AM: It started with Michael, myself and the children. Then the children went outside and
Michael and I had privacy in the living room.
C: You sat with Michael Jackson in private?
AM: Yes:
C: And you talked to him about medical issues?
AM: Mostly medical issues and the stress he was under rehearsal schedule?
C: How long was this conversation?
AM: I think I was there for an hour / an hour and a half totally. I would say that conversation -
20 minutes – 25 minutes.
C: How would you characterize his state of mind at that time?
2
AM: Lucid.
C: You said lucid – that’s not traditionally a state of mind… Under physical, mental
conditions – how was his mental outlook. Did he seem worried? Did he seem stressed?
AM: He was excited. He was talking to about some creative things he was thinking about. He
spoke to me about his excitement and fear about the tour.
C: What was his fear?
AM: I think it was a big obligation. He did not want to do the job with these 50 shows. And
he realized that this was a huge ordeal to do that.
C: Did he believe he was up to the task?
AM: I think he believed he was up to the task, but also fearful about his nutritional state and
staying healthy
C: What did he talk to you about regarding these issues?
AM: He talked about his nutritional state and some other states that I worked with him some
years ago. He also had various health issues – food – we talked about hydration and some
other things he had to do before and after performing. We didn’t talk about injuries. I think he
was doing very well with his chronic back issues. It was mostly his nutrition and hydration.
C: These conversation that you had with him - are they reflected in your medical records?
AM: Yes.
C: Under what type of language – general health issues?
AM: Yes. Medical issues we discussed including his physical and emotional strain to the
upcoming rehearsal concert schedule, his nutritional und hydration state of health and his
stress related to his profound sleep disorder.
C: On what point did Michael Jackson bring to your attention that he had a sleep disorder?
AM: Many years ago.
C: When did that occur?
AM: I would say over 15 to 20 years ago I know that sleep was an issue particularly after
performing – he could not come down.
C: You have known him at least 15 years.
AM: 15 to 20 years.
C: This was a problem on tours or on a regular base?
3
AM: I was familiar with it on tours when I was with him. And I treated these sleep issues over
the years infrequently.
C: Did you ever travel with Michael Jackson?
AM: Yes, I did.
C: Back to the conversation on April 18th: Did he mention to you any specific medicine that
he hoped to obtain for these sleep issues?
AM: He asked me about IV sleep medicine.
C: Did he happen to mention the name of this medicine?
AM: I think he used the word “juice”. I don’t think I heard the word of a specific medication.
C: And when he said IV sleep medication – what did you think what he meant?
AM: I’m not sure. It could be an IV Valium. It could be an anesthetic drug. I’m not sure what
he was asking.
C: He asked you for IV sleep medication?
AM: He did not believe any oral medicine would be helpful.
C: Did he tell you that he had tried oral medicine?
AM: Yes.
C: And what did he say what the success of it was?
AM: I don’t recall him naming him medicines, but I do clearly remember from personal
experience many medicines just did not work.
C: From personal experience what medicines did not work?
AM: I had personally tried him on Tylenol PM in the past. We had tried Xanax to help his
anxiety and help him go to sleep and on that visit I tried other medication to help him.
C: What medication did you try?
AM: I gave him Clonazepam and Trazadone not to be used together.
C: Was there any type further discussion the type of medication Michael Jackson was
interested in or looking for?
AM: I don’t recall but he mentioned some kind of an anesthetic.
C: You didn’t ask him at that point what type of anesthetic or what type of IV medication?
AM: I don’t ask him specifically about the given medication.
4
C: Are you familiar with the drug Propofol?
AM: I am now.
C: On April 18th, 2009, were you familiar with that drug?
AM: I’ve probably heard about it from patients having outpatient procedures or surgery. So I
was aware of the medication, but not about all the subtleties of that medication.

C: But during the treatment of Michael Jackson you have referred him to outpatient clinics,
haven’t you?
AM: I have referred him or worked with plastic surgeons or dermatologist.
C: You have referred him also to an anesthesiology clinic?
AM: I don’t recall referring him to any specific anesthesiology clinic.
C; Do you know Dr. Randy Rosen?
AM: Yes, I do.
C. Who is Dr. Randy Rosen?
AM: Randy Rosen is a pain management physician. And Randy and I have worked with
Michael in terms of pain management.
C: What kind of pain was Michael Jackson in to be managed?
AM: Most of the time it was chronic back sprain, mostly from overwork practicing,
performing and on a couple of occasions he had injuries.
C: Dr. Randy Rosen – what was his primary speciality?
AM: Maybe he is an anesthesiologist. I have worked with him specifically for pain
management.
C: Is he involved with the Spaulding Clinic in Beverly Hills?
AM: Now I think he is. I did work with him at the Spalding clinic.
C: What is the Spaulding Clinic?
AM: It’s a group of several physicians who, to my knowledge, do outpatient pain procedures
in their suite.
C: What kind of medications were provided to Michael Jackson for his pain?
AM: I don’t know.
5
C: During your conversation on April 18, did he tell you that he was visiting Dr. Arnold
Klein?
AM: Visiting Arnold Klein? During being in Los Angeles in that time?
C: During the period of time that he was in Los Angeles.
AM: I presume that he was seeing Dr. Klein frequently for dermatologic treatment.
C: You presume that why?
AM: Most of the time Michael was having mild dermatologic procedures, mild cosmetic
issues and his treatment of chronic vitiligo and other skin issues with Dr. Klein.”
C: Did – in your conversation with Michael Jackson on April 18 - was there any mention
about Michael Jackson of taking you to London?
AM: No.
C: Did he ever mention the need for having a doctor in London.
AM: Yes, he did.
C: Did he ever happen to tell you why he felt he needed a doctor?
AM: Michael was concerned about hydration, he was concerned about sleep and he was
concerned about injuries.

C: Did he ask for a referral from you for that?
AM: Maybe he did. I do not know any practicing physicians in London.
C: He told you he wanted a doctor. He told you he had sleep difficulties. He wanted to have
the IV medicine - you didn’t have any advice for him an that point other than to prescribe him
Clonazepam and Trazadone?”
AM: I couldn’t give him any other advice.
C: You did not provide him IV medication?
AM: I did not provide any intravenous medication for Michael Jackson.
C: Ever?
AM: I would say ever.
C: Your testimony today is that in 15 years you have never provided intravenous medication
of any sort?
AM: That is my testimony.
6
C: After the meeting you left – is that right? Did you ever have an occasion to speak with
Michael Jackson again?
AM: I don’t think so. I gave him instructions about the medicine I prescribed and asked him
to get back to me to tell which medication was helpful.
C: So from April 18th until the time of his death you did not speak with Michael Jackson, is
that right.
AM: I did not speak with Michael Jackson.
C: On April 18th - could you give us sort of the hours hat you have spoken to him.
AM: In person? When I visited him?
C: Yes.
AM: My notes reflect about one hour and a half.
W: No, I’m talking about the time. Was it 2 o’clock, three o’clock?
AM: I think it was an afternoon and I believe it was weekend. I can’t recall anymore than that.
C: Was it early afternoon? Late afternoon?
AM: I would say it was early afternoon. I don’t think it was morning – I don’t think it was late
afternoon.
C: During the 15 years that you treated Michael Jackson you keep your medical records, is
that right?
AM: Yes, I have.
C: And you do have those medical records?
AM: I have 5 pages of medical records since 2002.
C: After Michael Jackson’s death you were asked did to provide those medical records to the
Coroner?
AM: I provided them to an attorney and I was never asked to provide anything else.
C: And the record you provided to your attorney were the five pages that you have in front of
you?
AM: Yes.
C: Thank you.
7
WALGREN (cross-examination by the people): Dr. Metzger, on April 18, 2009, when
Michael Jackson required about intravenous sleep medication, you explain to him that was
dangerous, life-threatening and should not be done outside of a hospital, correct?
AM: That’s correct.
W: Did you ever give Michael Jackson Propofol?
AM: Never.
W: Is there any amount of money that would have convinced you to give him intravenous
Propofol in his house?”
AM: Absolutely not.

W: Thank you.
CHERNOFF (redirect examination): Dr. Metzger, you told Michael Jackson it was dangerous
and should never be given outside of a hospital?
AM: That’s correct.
W: But you didn’t have any idea what medicine he was referring to?
AM: Any intravenous anesthetic should not be given in a home.
C: So, what Michael Jackson said was “I want an intravenous anesthetic”?
AM: Or intravenous sleep medication.
C: Which one?
AM: In my records I say – quote: ”intravenous sleep medication”.
C: But you have independent recollection of him saying “anesthetic”?
AM: (waging his head and bending over his medical records) I’m not sure. My notes reflect
to „sleep medication“ and anything intravenous was unsafe.
C: Anything intravenous?
AM: As a sleep med.

C: You didn’t brought the subject further. You didn’t ask him what kind of medicine or
anything of that nature.
AM: I don’t recall getting into any more detail.
C: Thank you.
 
Last edited:
actually the claim about this was dismissed by the judge. Although you are right about the nature of the relationship, it wasn't a control as very simply put Michael had the choice of walking away.

for example your salary can help you pay for your house, car, food etc.. hence you might need your job to survive but the salary doesn't give your employer any power over you. You have the option to quit, look for a new job, be unemployed and even go bankrupt.

You're right, i remember the 'special relationship' claim was thrown out as it had very high specific requirements to warrant a civil lawsuit, but the judge did concede there was financial dependence here.

I know theoretically to outsiders mj had the option of walking away, either before tii negotiations began or in june 09, but i don't believe he felt he had the option. Bankruptcy, as that is what it would result in, is an option for most of us, but i feel for someone proud like mj who had already been subject to constant humiliations and whose bankruptcy wd receive front page news across teh globe with much gloating, it wd be unbearable for him. The selling of his catalogue, another way out, is another issue that an objective outsider cd see as an option for mj as a way out of his financial troubles, but for various reasons this was something that mj felt unable to do maybe out of pride, stubborness, a feeling of paranoia that his ownership of the catalogue lay behind his career setbacks and he resolutely refused to give it up. I just feel mj can't be seen like ordinary civilians, he had very unique pressures - but perfectly rightly as we're all equal before the law the judge didn't agree to this partic claim.
 
Last edited:
PRINCE JACKSON
TELLS JURY AEG MADE MJ CRY
BREAKING NEWS
Prince Jackson -- Michael Jackson's eldest son -- told jurors today in the wrongful death case, he was afraid of AEG and MJ even cried during contentious phone calls with the company.

Prince testified his dad was amped over the "This is It" tour but felt he needed more time to rehearse. Apparently, AEG and MJ got into it during phone conversations and the calls made Michael break down in tears.

The point of the testimony -- lawyers for the Jackson family are trying to prove AEG pushed Michael mercilessly and that, combined with Conrad Murray's bad medicine, cost MJ his life.


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2013/06/26/princ...ongful-death-lawsuit-testimony/#ixzz2XLa9z2mp
 
I mean the hype of him being on the stand. Like AEG was going to be just stunned

Oh okay, Im with you and yes I agree, the Jacksons lawyers will be pulling at every heart string I think. Totally unfair on the kid IMO
 
JACKSON'S SON SAYS FATHER FEARED CONCERT PROMOTER
By ANTHONY McCARTNEY
— Jun. 26 2:18 PM EDT
You are here
Home » AP Party » Jackson's son says father feared concert promoter
SHARE

0

inShare
Share on Tumblr


FILE - In this Oct. 8, 2011 file photo, Prince Michael Jackson appears on stage at the Michael Forever the Tribute Concert, at the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff. An attorney for Michael Jackson’s mother, Katherine Jackson, says the singer’s eldest son, Prince, will testify in a Los Angeles courtroom in the negligent hiring case against AEG Live LLC on Wednesday, June 26, 2013. Prince, 16, is a plaintiff in the case against concert promoter AEG Live. (AP Photo/Joel Ryan, File) *Editorial Use Only*


FILE - In this Oct. 8, 2011 file photo, Prince Michael Jackson appears on stage at the Michael Forever the Tribute Concert, at the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff. An attorney for Michael Jackson’s mother, Katherine Jackson, says the singer’s eldest son, Prince, will testify in a Los Angeles courtroom in the negligent hiring case against AEG Live LLC on Wednesday, June 26, 2013. Prince, 16, is a plaintiff in the case against concert promoter AEG Live. (AP Photo/Joel Ryan, File) *Editorial Use Only*
Prev 1 of 2 Next

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Michael Jackson's eldest son testified Wednesday that his father was excited about going back on tour before his death but wasn't happy about the terms of the ill-fated shows.

Prince Jackson told jurors his father wanted more time to rehearse and had several tense phone conversations with promoters of his "This Is It" shows that sometimes ended with his father in tears.

The 16-year-old said his father remarked after one of the conversations, "'They're going to kill me,'" Prince testified. He did not elaborate.

The lawsuit claims AEG negligently hired the doctor who was later convicted of involuntary manslaughter for giving Jackson an overdose of the anesthetic propofol.

AEG denies it hired the physician or bears any responsibility for the entertainer's death.

The testimony by Prince Jackson began with the teenager showing jurors roughly 15 minutes of private family photos and home videos.

He described growing up on Neverland Ranch and showed the panel videos of the property's petting zoos and other amenities. After his father's acquittal of child molestation charges, Prince described living in the Middle East, Ireland and Las Vegas.

He told the jury that his father was always working, but his children had no idea he was a global superstar.

"We always listened to his music, but we never knew how famous he was," Prince said.

He said he and his sister Paris watched a video of one of their father's performances and got a sense of his fame when overwhelmed fans were carried from his shows on stretchers.

Prince is the first Jackson family member to testify during the trial, now in its ninth week. Attorneys have said TJ Jackson, who serves a co-guardian to Prince and his siblings, and Taj Jackson, are also expected to take the witness stand. They are the sons of Tito Jackson.

Prince Jackson, his sister Paris and brother Blanket are plaintiffs in the case against AEG, which their grandmother and primary caretaker filed in August 2010.

In court, Prince wore a black suit with a dark grey tie with his long brown hair tucked behind his ears. He spoke softly as he began testifying, and the first exhibit shown to jurors was a photo taken with their grandmother on his and Paris' first day of school.

He described his school life, including taking a summer course in U.S. history, participating on the school's robotics team and volunteer work.

Another image shown to jurors was Michael Jackson playing piano with his son while Prince was still an infant or toddler.

Plaintiff's attorney Brian Panish asked Prince whether he was interested in pursuing a career in music.

"I can never play an instrument and I definitely cannot sing," Prince said to laughter from the jury.

He said he wanted to study film or business when he goes to college.

Prince said he helped attorneys pick out the videos and photos shown in court.

Michael Jackson sheltered his children from the public eye while he was alive, often obscuring their faces while out in public. The children have been more public in recent years, appearing at a star-studded memorial service and other events honoring their father.

Paris, 15, had also been expected to testify during the case but was hospitalized last month and her status as a witness remained unclear. Attorneys for AEG played a snippet of her videotaped deposition last week, and more of her testimony may be played for the jury later in the trial.

Blanket, 11, is not expected to testify.

The jury of six men and six women has learned numerous details about Jackson's role as a father during the case. They've heard about a secret trip to a movie weeks before Michael Jackson's death, a private circus he hired for Paris' 11th birthday, and Blanket's interest in his father's dance rehearsals.

The trial is expected to last several more weeks.
 
^^^^ heartbreaking. But I am a bit confused about Michael wanting more time to rehearse when he was missing some rehearsals. Perhaps this phone call was fairly early on, idk.
 
If Michael wanted more time to rehearse why was he missing the time he had to rehearse? That line makes no sense to me. AEG wanted Michael to rehearse and Michael needed more time to rehearse but Michael is not showing up to rehearse and did not have too
 
updated AP

Prince said that he saw AEG Live CEO Randy Phillips at the family's rented mansion in a heated conversation with his father's doctor in days before his father's death. The teenager said he wasn't sure what day the conversation occurred, but that he saw Phillips grabbing former cardiologist Conrad Murray's elbow.

Phillips "looked aggressive to me," Prince said.

Michael Jackson wasn't at home at the time and was probably at rehearsals, Prince said.

The teenage also for the first time publicly described the day his father died. Prince was summoned to his father's bedroom and saw Murray performing CPR on his father, who was hanging off the bed halfway and it appeared his dad's eyes were rolled up in the back of his head.

Prince's eyes appeared red as he described being told by Murray at a nearby hospital that his father was dead.
 
a longer article from TMZ


Prince Jackson -- Michael Jackson's eldest son -- told jurors today in the wrongful death case, Michael Jackson had such problems with AEG he would cry and say, "They're gonna kill me ... they're gonna kill me."

Prince testified his dad was amped over the "This Is It" tour but felt he needed more time to rehearse. Apparently, AEG and MJ got into it during phone conversations and the calls made Michael break down in tears.

Prince also testified AEG honcho Randy Phillips came over to the house several times and he saw Phillips aggressively grab Dr. Conrad Murray by the elbow, as if to school him.

Prince got personal and talked about how involved Michael was in his kids' lives -- something that's highly relevant in a wrongful death case in assessing damages. He told the jury about how MJ loved home videos -- one showing Prince on a little car as Paris talked into a mic while "Daddy's Home" (a Jackson 5 song) played in the background.

Prince also said the day MJ went into full cardiac arrest at his home, Paris was screaming that she wanted her daddy. Prince says Dr. Murray announced at the house that MJ was dead from a heart attack.

The point of the testimony -- lawyers for the Jackson family are trying to prove AEG pushed Michael mercilessly and that, combined with Murray's bad medicine, cost MJ his life.

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2013/06/26/prince...#ixzz2XLdxcGsF
Visit Fishwrapper: http://www.fishwrapper.com
 
We are back to square one. Yes, in hindsight the contract aeg-murray--mj was not a good idea but ONLY b/c it made AEG liable for this lawsuit. What you are saying is that AEG could have/should have protected themselves better. However, that has nothing to do with CM's agreement with MJ for propofol to be administered--b/c there is no evidence that AEG knew about it or in any way encouraged/promoted that CM use that 'remedy' for insomnia. And it really has IMO nothing to do with MJ's death b/c as long as Murray was administering propofol the way he was MJ was set for a disaster.

Thanks for finding this (Metzger's testimony).
I'm back to square one, because I was just answering your post.
I believe propofol is irrelevant to this trial. The point is just to show that Murray was incompetent, and that AEG knew it, and still got into a contract with Murray. An icompetent doctor is potentially dangerous, especially after AEG saw Michael's health deterioring under his care. Honestly, I don't think the jacksons need to go any further than that to prove their claim.
 
CNN update

'They're going to kill me,' Michael Jackson told son
By Alan Duke, CNN

NEW: Prince Jackson, 16, talks about his father's relationship with AEG Live execs
NEW: He describes "aggressive" encounter between AEG head and Dr. Conrad Murray
It's possible jurors will see video of Paris Jackson's deposition as Prince is cross-examined
The wrongful death trial of AEG Live is in its ninth week in a Los Angeles courtroom

Los Angeles (CNN) -- Michael Jackson often cried after talking to AEG Live executives as he prepared for his comeback concerts, his oldest son testified Wednesday.

"After he got off the phone, he would cry," Prince Jackson testified. "He would say 'They're going to kill me, they're going to kill me.'"

His father told him he was talking about AEG LIve CEO Randy Phillips and his ex-manager, Dr. Tohme Tohme, Prince said.

Prince, 16, began his testimony Wednesday morning in his family's wrongful death lawsuit against Jackson's last concert promoter, AEG Live.

His first 30 minutes on the stand were filled with videos and photographs of Jackson with his children, but then the questioning by Jackson lawyer Brian Panish focused on the last weeks of his father's life.
Prince testified that Phillips visited Jackson's rented Los Angeles mansion and spoke aggressively to Dr. Conrad Murray the night before his father's death.

"He was grabbing his elbow," Prince said. "It looked aggressive to me. He was grabbing by the back of his elbow and they were really close and he was making hand motions."

He couldn't hear what Phillips was saying to Murray, he said.

Michael Jackson was not there because he was at his last rehearsal, Prince said. He called his father from the security guard shack telephone to let him know Phillips was there. His father asked him to offer Phillips food and drink.

Prince said that was his last conversation with his father.

Prince was 12 when the pop icon died, but he said his father confided in him about whom he trusted and didn't trust and what he feared as he prepared for his comeback concerts.
 
What does any of this have to do with who hired Murray and who supervised him? This is exploitation at it&#8217;s worst.<o:p></o:p>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top