LastTear;3850610 said:
Wasn't the subject of Grace raised by the Jacksons lawyers first? I doubt if this would keep Grace off the stand, if anything, she would be chomping at the bit to get on there.
I don't know if it's just me but imo 99% of what is brought to this trial has nothing to do with the hiring of Murray.
$10k from Janet? How very generous of her. :no:
Yes, this line of questioning about Grace was irrelevant from the Jacksons, I agree. Did AEG really need to sink even lower using Paris' depo ? No.
ivy;3850875 said:
I wonder what makes the doctor say Michael was "totally" sleep deprived. I thought Murray worked 6 days. And something from Dr. Shafer Q&A.
MJJC: What are the known effects on the nervous system & the brain of long term Propofol use?
Dr. Steve Shafer: Not a lot, because it is rarely used for long term use. I have been able to find one report of a patient who received propofol in the intensive care unit for 51 days. This is from the conclusion of the article: “To our knowledge, this report represents the first documentation of propofol use for long-term sedation in a mechanically ventilated pregnant patient and the longest duration of continuous infusion propofol published in the medical literature. Propofol was used for 51 days with no documented maternal adverse events.” (Tajchman SK, Bruno JJ. Prolonged propofol use in a critically ill pregnant patient. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:2018-22)
This patient was weaned from propofol over several days without adverse consequences. So administration for 2 months appears to not have long term consequences, at least based on this example, and the fact that Michael Jackson continued to function at rehearsal. However, those are just two data points. More research needs to be done if one contemplates development of propofol for long term use.
Form what dr Shafer (or was it this other very interesting doctor, the sleep sepcialist) said on the stand during Cm trial , ICU patients were receiving propofol during the night, midazolam (benzos) during the day. So if they slept during the day, which is possible in an ICU, they would have got some "real sleep".
It has to be taken into account also that ICU patients are not as active as Michael was.
There was also that experiment that was cited in CM trial in China with I think 60 or so patients, who were given propofol to INDUCE sleep (ie not all night) for 2 weeks, and recovered from insomnia, with no adverse effects.
I would have to re read what that sleep specialist said today on the stand, but I wouldn't take it 100% lack of sleep, as if Murray was ONLY using propofol for the whole night, because he was clearly not.
When we asked Shafer about those weird symptoms in the Q&A he said side effect of propofol, flu, benzo withdrawal. I think you could add and/or between each cause.
I suffered from severe sleep disorders myself a few years ago, ending up with no sleep for up to 48 hours , and then 2-3 hours, sometimes a lot more and then no sleep for 1 or 2 days. I was not as active as Michael was, and I never had all those symptoms Michael showed, and I think I can tell you that you do not recover in one day from such a lack of sleep.
Bottomline, it would be good to have this testimony in full, not in tweets or one article from alan Duke that could be exaggerated , but the essence of it might have some truth, in the sense that those symptoms could be lack of sleep.
Some of you already pointed out earlier in this thread that those symptoms could be due to propofol because Murray was not an anesthesist, so that doctor could be saying exactly what you said earlier.
I think it's possible that Murray used TOO MUCH propofol, but he definitely not used ONLY propofol.
serendipity;3850989 said:
^Could that explain Kai Chase's testimony that MJ appeared frightened?
Maybe , but that wouldn't be the only cause IMO.
LastTear;3850994 said:
I found Dr Czeisler's testimony to be very sad but I'm not actually holding much store by it, only because all that he is testifying to is based on clear hindsight and that no lay person would have the knowledge, even if they knew of MJ's insomnia, to place those symptoms together and realise what the issues were.
Yes, I agree, their point was to say a sleep specialist was more indicated than a cardiologist, especially if you think that they were aware of Michael's sleep issues, and that they witnessed Michael "deteriorating" under Murray's care.
But clearly AEG are not doctors , so they could not have diagnosed anything themselves, and that testimony should not be so long.
smoothlugar;3850738 said:
Ok, maybe it’s not so pointless after all and I agree with what you say above. In fact for a long time that was my explanation for the episode of the “blanket” taken separatedly, TILL I saw Ortega reading his email in the criminal trial of CM. From that context and corroborated by other recent testimonies and emails, I cannot see that episode isolatedly, but within another whole picture.
.
That's completely true. Michael WAS cold , I think there is no point in arguing about that IMO. Too many people said that, from both sides, including Paris. Then you have all the rest : Michael losing weight, Michael deteriorating, Michael having a "terrible case of the chills" coming from Ortega who has worked and known Michael for over 20 years, Michael not able to use a fork, heaters brought to his room, people who touched him and said he was cold...
Maybe Staples Center has air conditionning, but 1- Michael was coming from outside when he had this blanket on, 2- Other people would have mentionned it , 3- You wouldn't see people in short sleeves.