MJ Forever Tribute/ MJJC Statement / Estate statement / Fan letter pg51/ GLE put on administration

Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

^^I disagree with you in some respects.

We make judgment calls every day based on what people do. But that doesn't mean that our judgement calls are going to be fair and to the proper degree.

And not forgiving someone who contributed in even a small way to MJ's negative image?? MJ himself contributed to his own negative image in some ways. So what? People are not consistent. They pick and choose who they want to follow when they are a part of a group who all did the same thing. Spike Lee spoke about MJ's appearance, not in jokes, but very forthright in interviews. But since he throws a party in the park, I guess it is ok now? Jamie may have made jokes about MJ in stand up, but when speaking to him forthright, as in that interview, he always acknowledge MJ's greatness and continued to do so after he passed. What gives Spike a pass and gets Jamie downgraded when they both did the same thing?

Now everyone might not have treated MJ correctly while he was still here. Hindsight is 20/20. But he has never said a cross thing about MJ after he died, which is more than can be said for some people. What kills me, is that there are some people who now genuinely want to help, who continually and consistently spotlight the kind of person MJ was, and it's MJ's own fans who want to have memories of elephants.

And please do not compare what Jamie said to someone making a racist statement. They do NOT compare in the slightest.

If someone wantef to hate every single person who ever said and did anything wrong to MJ in his life, then what could I say? They can go talk to Bubbles and be only his fan because that is about all who you are going to find that we know of. Otherwise, if you are in the market for forgiving some and not others, then you might come off a bit hypocritical. Jamie making fun of MJ's appearance in a comedy skit yet commending him and contribution to music when speaking on the real does not do as much damage as Spike Lee on the real talk commenting on MJ becoming less black and purposely getting rid of his Black features.
 
Jamie Foxx to Host MJ Tribute Concert


(MTV UK) – Jamie Foxx has been announced as the host of the Michael Jackson tribute concert.

The Oscar winner, who provided vocals on Kanye West’s2005 smash Gold Digger and has released four albums of his own, will also perform at the event.
“I am truly honoured to be working with Global Live Events and the Jackson family members in participating in this epic event,” Jamie said. “Michael was larger than life and I have admired him, honoured him, joked about him but always loved and respected him… I hope I honour his legacy in a way that would make him laugh and cry.”
Leona Lewis, JLS, Christina Aguilera, Cee Lo Green and Craig David are among the big names confirmed for the tribute concert, along with another new name, Smokey Robinson. The event takes place on 8 October at Cardiff’s Millennium Stadium.
Beyoncé‘s management this week denied reports she was pulling out of the event due to her pregnancy, and instead promised a “unique, never before seen performance” that will be played via satellite to the crowds in Cardiff.
Although the tribute concert isn’t officially endorsed by the Jackson family, Michael’s motherKatherineand his children, Paris, Blanket and Prince Michael, have said they will attend.
Paris, Blanket and Prince have decided to go,” their rep confirmed. “They are extremely excited and are hoping they will have the opportunity to contribute in some way by making a speech.”

http://www.mjnewsalerts.com/2011/09...t/?utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=twitterfeed






<form method="get" id="searchform" action="http://www.mjnewsalerts.com/" autocomplete="off" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; ">

</form>







 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

^^I disagree with you in some respects.

We make judgment calls every day based on what people do. But that doesn't mean that our judgement calls are going to be fair and to the proper degree.

And not forgiving someone who contributed in even a small way to MJ's negative image?? MJ himself contributed to his own negative image in some ways. So what? People are not consistent. They pick and choose who they want to follow when they are a part of a group who all did the same thing. Spike Lee spoke about MJ's appearance, not in jokes, but very forthright in interviews. But since he throws a party in the park, I guess it is ok now? Jamie may have made jokes about MJ in stand up, but when speaking to him forthright, as in that interview, he always acknowledge MJ's greatness and continued to do so after he passed. What gives Spike a pass and gets Jamie downgraded when they both did the same thing?

Now everyone might not have treated MJ correctly while he was still here. Hindsight is 20/20. But he has never said a cross thing about MJ after he died, which is more than can be said for some people. What kills me, is that there are some people who now genuinely want to help, who continually and consistently spotlight the kind of person MJ was, and it's MJ's own fans who want to have memories of elephants.

And please do not compare what Jamie said to someone making a racist statement. They do NOT compare in the slightest.

If someone wantef to hate every single person who ever said and did anything wrong to MJ in his life, then what could I say? They can go talk to Bubbles and be only his fan because that is about all who you are going to find that we know of. Otherwise, if you are in the market for forgiving some and not others, then you might come off a bit hypocritical. Jamie making fun of MJ's appearance in a comedy skit yet commending him and contribution to music when speaking on the real does not do as much damage as Spike Lee on the real talk commenting on MJ becoming less black and purposely getting rid of his Black features.

^ First of all, just to be clear, I'm not comparing what Jamie's said to racist 'jokes' that morons make..I'm just saying that some people guise hate and mockery as "comedy".

And yes Jamie as has made negative comments after Michael has passed according to bluetopez "Jamie foxx even joked about MJ's nose right on a radio show! Right before the so called "BET tribute" to MJ after he passed, while pluggin the show!
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

^ First of all, just to be clear, I'm not comparing what Jamie's said to racist 'jokes' that morons make..I'm just saying that some people guise hate and mockery as "comedy".

And yes Jamie as has made negative comments after Michael has passed according to bluetopez "Jamie foxx even joked about MJ's nose right on a radio show! Right before the so called "BET tribute" to MJ after he passed, while pluggin the show!
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

eddie Grifftin made unpleasant jookes about MJ and had a change of heart when he got to meet him and the rest of the family. Chris Rock seems to have something against Michael, b/c he commented on Paris at the memorial, saying she didn't know any better and when his kids get older they're gonna realized how crazy he was and dissed on him too, i'm appalled b/c he's a father himself and wouldn't want people to say this to his kids about him. Also about Spike Lee comment about wanting to get rid of his black features, I think majority of the African American and White Community felt that way. they
probably never hear of vitilago before in their life until this happen to Michael but lots of people thought he bleached his skin and wanted to be white . there's one music site with majority of african american members talking about why they have mixed feeling about Michael b/c they grew up with the jacksons in the 70's They were the American Dream, a black family coming from nothing to becoming big stars gave breaking color barriers giving hope that your dreams can come true no matter what race or background you came from. the members were talking about how they felt angry when MJ's appearance
started to change b/c they felt they couldn't relate to him anymore. I think some black celebrites felt that way too , Like John legend made some remark about 2 yrs ago about him being celebrated as a black icon b/c of his appearance and his kids, and mj's fans complained to him and he apologized , chris rock and katt williams were j5 fans growing up and probably though this too, and with the white media it caused lots of choa that an African American's popularity had rivaled the Beatles and Elvis so when Mj's vitilago worsened the Media ran with the story like hey michael Jackson is changing is skin color which is messed up how he got heat for something he can't control
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

^ Ginvid

To be honest, I'm just looking at what members have been saying what Jamie said about Michael..I've never follow what Jamie has ever done...So..*shrug*

Michael Jackson fans aren't often going to like people who blatantly mocked Michael about his appearance (whether it was in the past or now)..it's that simple I think lol..What else do you expect? Honestly.. :lol:

Well, as I said in my previous posts it's all about feeding into perceptions..It isn't solely about the fact that Jamie mocked Michael. It's how people had a mob mentality where they felt it was ok to constantly disrespect Michael..Just look how that attitude stems into how it is today, look at all the stupid ish we have to hear about Michael to this day..I'm not putting it onto one person, lots of people fed into it, we all know who for the most part. I think fans have the total right to not like people who fed into it all, to however much degree they did.

I guess we'll agree to disagree then ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

^ Ginvid

To be honest, I'm just looking at what members have been saying what Jamie said about Michael..I've never follow what Jamie has ever done...So..*shrug*

Michael Jackson fans aren't often going to like people who blatantly mocked Michael (whether it was in the past or now)..it's that simple I think lol..What else do you expect? Honestly.. :lol:

Well, as I said in my previous posts it's all about feeding into perceptions..It isn't solely about the fact that Jamie mocked Michael. It's how people had a mob mentality where they felt it was ok to constantly disrespect Michael..Just look how that attitude stems into how it is today, look at all the stupid ish we have to hear about Michael to this day..I'm not putting it onto person, lots of people fed into it, we all know who for the most part. I think fans have the total right to not like people who fed into it all, to however much degree they did.

I guess we'll agree to disagree then ;)

Your first point is exactly what I am talking about. It is how some fans rile up other fans to have a negative perception of a particular person without people everything in context. Then it causes mass hysteria and has people not knowing what the complete situation is, degrading a person who in context doesn't deserve it my opinion. Jamie isn't like Chris or Katt or others, who every chance they get demean MJ and NEVER have anything nice to say about him. Jamie did one standup (which is more than enough to me) and has since then had noting but good things to say about MJ. He never (from what I can remember) joked about molestation, etc. He talked about MJ's appearance on this one occassion and other places has done nothing but admire MJ's talent. I am just saying everything is not always black and white, and, sometimes MJ fans act like it is.

But yes, we can agree to disagree. ;) :)
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

^^ I noticed that too...oh well...
 
Ben;3480226 said:
Jamie Foxx to Host MJ Tribute Concert


(MTV UK) – Jamie Foxx has been announced as the host of the Michael Jackson tribute concert.

The Oscar winner, who provided vocals on Kanye West’s2005 smash Gold Digger and has released four albums of his own, will also perform at the event.
“I am truly honoured to be working with Global Live Events and the Jackson family members in participating in this epic event,” Jamie said. “Michael was larger than life and I have admired him, honoured him, joked about him but always loved and respected him… I hope I honour his legacy in a way that would make him laugh and cry.”
Leona Lewis, JLS, Christina Aguilera, Cee Lo Green and Craig David are among the big names confirmed for the tribute concert, along with another new name, Smokey Robinson. The event takes place on 8 October at Cardiff’s Millennium Stadium.
Beyoncé‘s management this week denied reports she was pulling out of the event due to her pregnancy, and instead promised a “unique, never before seen performance” that will be played via satellite to the crowds in Cardiff.
Although the tribute concert isn’t officially endorsed by the Jackson family, Michael’s motherKatherineand his children, Paris, Blanket and Prince Michael, have said they will attend.
Paris, Blanket and Prince have decided to go,” their rep confirmed. “They are extremely excited and are hoping they will have the opportunity to contribute in some way by making a speech.”

http://www.mjnewsalerts.com/2011/09...t/?utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=twitterfeed






<form method="get" id="searchform" action="http://www.mjnewsalerts.com/" autocomplete="off" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; ">

</form>




So.....I guess this means the children are officially getting involved? Making a speech?
I wonder how they would feel if the concert isn't sold out by then...
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

So.....I guess this means the children are officially getting involved? Making a speech?
I wonder how they would feel if the concert isn't sold out by then...

Lol, less than 7000 tickets sold, it gonna be so empty this stadium :lol:
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

As per Contactmusic, "A representative for the Jackson family tells Tmz.com, "Paris, Blanket and Prince have been asked to attend the MJ Tribute in Wales and they have decided to go" I think the rep is for the fam. and MTK.UK just made a grammatical mistake.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

wow so they've mad uo their minds now... hope they won't be too disappointed to see a half empty stadium
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

I think we are forgetting that giving examples of nastiness is not saying they are equal. All these people, Foxx, Lee, and Chris are all examples of people who disrespected Michael. The difference with Lee is that he recognized that Michael had a medical condition and came to the conclusion that all is forgiven. Now if someone like Spike makes a party in the park, if I want to, I will support that. As long as people like Foxx and Chris have not shown that their actions were wrong, I do not care to have them take a leading role in a Michael event. This only suggests to people that it is OK to engage in nasty behaviors for the sake of comedy at the expense of certain people.

I do not know how many of you remembered that Brooklyn comedian, Andrew Dice. He was very hot in the 80s and made nasty jokes about women and races. Many liked him, but the "political correct" advocates got after him and that certainly ruined his career. The point of this is that it was not acceptable to make those jokes in the majority eyes, so pressure was put on him. His career folded. Why is it then acceptable to make those types of jokes about Michael? I am sure Dice had friends of different races and he had a girlfriend who was pregnant. People at that time would never allow Dice to give jokes at a women's convention. Why, because it sends a wrong message. We can like his jokes as individuals, but when it comes to aligning that type of humor with a particular event, we have to look at the message that that is saying.

Now look at Michael, why no one feels those jokes are inappropriate and hurtful regardless of whether the person praises his music? What is it about Michael that makes ridicule funnier and more appropriate. To me, unless these people acknowledge that their jokes were painful to Michael and they are sorry, I cannot support the choice made by GLE. There are comedians out there who did not make jokes about Michael's medical condition.

The message that this tribute is giving is that anyone who laughed at, made fun of, or disrespected Michael is welcome as long as you agree that his music is good. Now I accept that some of you here agree with that message, but I do not.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

The children were always part of the deal, so why is that report making it sound as though they just found this out. Remember Andy said that the kids will not perform. In my book giving a speech is a form of performance. Sure it is not like singing and dancing, but it is a performance. Now that so few tickets have been sold and they see the weeks moving fast, they decided to add kids information to the media article to garner interest in buying tickets. These people are so transparent, that only the dim witted will not see through this.

Oh sorry for double posting.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

No, I am sorry. Lee did not say he was sory for what he said. He said he forgave MJ for all that he did now that he was dead. He was saying the fault was MJs but he forgave MJ now. So your argument does not stand. Foxx not only praised MJ for his musical ability and talent but praised him as a person. You compare Jamie who made one remark with a man who has based his whole career on demeaning women and the analogy just does not fit. It would fit if you were talking about Chris who made a whole career of bashing MJ just as Dice made a whole career of bashing women. But that is not the type of person you are talking about. For a person like Jamie who is known now overall as being respectful to what he said to MJ, the two cannot be compared. To hold him to a singular comment made ten years ago when so many in between have been praiseworthy is not fair to me. Now some fans want to remember everyhing a person does and use it against them until they die without regard for context or situation, and that is fine for them However, everything is not that cut and dry to me. But that is just me.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

Regardless ginvid I am again stating different types of nastiness and what people consider appropriate. Spike no doubt forgave Michael for changing his nose. The surgery was something that many found distasteful. I never asked him, but Spike must have realized that Michael had a medical condition and felt sorry that he had talked about it without having all the facts. Jamie did not make one remark about Michael. All remarks contributed to the negative image of Michael. Foxx did not make these comments 10 years ago only but as recently as when Michael died. Take a look back on the forum and you will see.

If you see fans holding on to things and use it against the person, ask them why they are doing that. You might find some interesting answers. The idea that Foxx is known "overall as being respectful to what he said about MJ" is your take on the situation. Some of us, including me do not see him as known for that.

My feelings remain the same--having people who disrespected Michael during and after his death like Foxx, does not send the right message in a tribute of the man himself. It is in that context, that I am against Foxx. He should not be in charge of opening such an event. However, since it is a Jackson event and not really an estate event, I guess it is ok

Elusive when you get a chance can you check the sales again.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

The problem with this tribute is there is no true connection with Mj and the people who will tribute him other then their admiration for him from afar! With the exception of Smokey and whoever else from motwon shows up? But, people like Jamie foxx never was friends with michael! Which made it easy for him to diss Mj. And Christina Aguilera, she is a much bigger fan of Madonna. I rarely ever heard her say anything about MJ.

A real tribute should have more of people who were actually friends of his and performers we know that really was impacted by him that actually got to talk to him and meet him. People like Usher, Neyo & Rihanna! Right now the closes to that will be or was Beyonce. The rest is like blah! So my problem is that it doesn't feel that personal this tribute! It's just a easy way to make money!
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

Regardless ginvid I am again stating different types of nastiness and what people consider appropriate. Spike no doubt forgave Michael for changing his nose. The surgery was something that many found distasteful. I never asked him, but Spike must have realized that Michael had a medical condition and felt sorry that he had talked about it without having all the facts. Jamie did not make one remark about Michael. All remarks contributed to the negative image of Michael. Foxx did not make these comments 10 years ago only but as recently as when Michael died. Take a look back on the forum and you will see.

If you see fans holding on to things and use it against the person, ask them why they are doing that. You might find some interesting answers. The idea that Foxx is known "overall as being respectful to what he said about MJ" is your take on the situation. Some of us, including me do not see him as known for that.

My feelings remain the same--having people who disrespected Michael during and after his death like Foxx, does not send the right message in a tribute of the man himself. It is in that context, that I am against Foxx. He should not be in charge of opening such an event. However, since it is a Jackson event and not really an estate event, I guess it is ok

Elusive when you get a chance can you check the sales again.

I am sorry Petra, but you are wrong. Jamie has not said anything bad about MJ since he died. Post a link to it if he did, otherwise, you please read what was written in this thread about Jamie. Spike on the other hand was on TV June 30th saying that he forgave MJ for trying to turn white and he forgave MJ for getting rid of his black features. He said this in a candid interview without jokes. And he did not attribute it to a disease. He in that interview was contributing to the image that MJ hated his race and wanted to be white. Lee has never apologized for this and has never set the record straight. Yet somehow for some fans, they don't consider this as contributing to a negative image of MJ and people excuse this as if it is nothing. You have to be consistent. If you are going to down one person for something and not support what they do, then you have to aopply this to everyone. That is all I am saying.

I bet you did not even know who Jamie was before all of this and had no idea what his take on MJ was. I bet you got your opinion based off of what someone else said in this thread. What someone else incorrrectly said in this thread so don't act as if yopu have this understanding of him and you are holding it against him based on this understandiong. How people like you, who do not even know the person, or are not even familiar with their body of work can make a conclusion about their entire personality and thoughts is beyond me. I remember a quote you made that said "I bet he was a bandwagon jumper and only cared about MJ after he died". This shows me I am correct in my assessment and you knew very little of Jamie before he was brought up as being in this tribute. I posted a link to an interview he did about going to the victory concert. I posted a video that Jamie did from his comedy show where he was showing respect to Mj in a funny way. I bet you didn't even look at those. Yet people are content with pointing to ONE video (and it is only one) that Jamie did 10 years ago and hold it against him when he said so much more since in favor of MJ (as I said, if you have a link to prove me wrong, then post it). Otherwise, all I am saying is that before fans jump all over a person, they should at least exam the full history before making a judgemnt call. That is not only being fair, but that is being responsible. And it is what any person deserves before they are just discounted.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

Jamie Foxx's comedy routine, "White Women vs. Black Women" is one of the most OBSCENE performances I've ever seen. There is a Youtube video, but I won't post it here because it's NOT PG-13. I sincerely hope he doesn't think this type of material is appropriate with Michael's children in the audience? It is my opinion that Foxx is an extremely bad choice to host this "tribute."
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

What does that have to do with MJ? Have you seen some of the things the other performers have done? People are saying Lady Gaga and Rihanna or Katy Perry are international starts and are more appropriate for this concert. Have you seen some of the things that they do? have you listened to the lyrics of some of their songs? Quite naturally, they would know to be age appropriate. Of course they would know how to tune it down depending on audience.

Some of you just hate the idea of the tribute show so much that you are ready to massacre anyone associated with it, whether the criticism fits or not.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p




@font-face { font-family: "Times"; }@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } I, for one, thought Michael was BEAUTIFUL!

Remarks made by Foxx at the BET Awards:

Of all the Michael Jackson tributes taking place since the King of Pop died tragically Thursday afternoon, this has to be one of our favorites so far.


Hosting Sunday's BET Awards at the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles, Foxx walked on stage dressed as an 80s era Jackson - complete with the gloves - as "Beat It" blared in the background. He shouted for the audience to clap their hands.

Saying he was there to honor Jackson, Foxx said "It don't matter what he looked like ... what his nose looked like ... it was what he sounded like."

"C'mon," he yelled, "for Michael."


http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2009/06/jamie-foxx-moonwalk-bet-awards-michael-jackson/


 
ExoticPrincess;3480357 said:
Paris, Blanket and Prince have decided to go,&#8221; their rep confirmed. &#8220;They are extremely excited and are hoping they will have the opportunity to contribute in some way by making a speech.&#8221;

http://www.mjnewsalerts.com/2011/09/...ce=twitterfeed

So the kids have a rep now?....lol


I am NOT surprised by anything anymore...Michael must be rolling in his grave. I am so sorry Michael. THEY are STILL using the kids to publicize this piece of shit event.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

So??? It was already mentioned in this thread that for Black people, how MJ looked was a matter of deep contention. If you asked the average black person, many felt MJ had sold out. You have to consider your audience. Jamie was making it known, that regardless of how the black people felt about how MJ looked, there was no denying that this man should be honored. There was no denying what this man has done. He went on after that comment to say how they were celebrating MJ of all eras, light skinned and dark skinned. Again, as I said before, when BET has commercials about their stars, they don't show MJ past his afro. It is well known how many felt after this time period that Mj was not "black enough" for them. Jamie said, we are claiming MJ of all eras and celebrating MJ of all eras. He was talking to an audience of people who on many levels disowned MJ at a certain point. He also said how MJ was a black man, and should be celebrated as such.

If you are going to bring out random quotes to condemn a person, put it in context and know what you are talking about. I am so upset at people picking solitary comments out of context to try and persuade people to jump on this hate bandwagon.

I watched the BET awards. Did you? I listened to Jamie's interviews. Did you? Do you know who he really is? Have you examined him and his career, or are you picking and choosing? If you are picking and choosing then there is not need to converse with people who will not educate themselves but yet are so quick to come to a conclusion about who a person is.

I am not trying to be harsh. And, if after really examining Jamie, if people still felt the same, what could I say. But I think we all have a responsiblity to denounce misinformation, especially if it is used to change others' opinions about a person.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

Ginviv I was having an intelligent debate and I noticed you crossed the line when you said "I bet you did not know.............." I am disappointed in you. I will not fight with people on a forum. You have now reduced it to a attack on self. I think I will move on now.


Blue I like your points on who should be in a tribute, and the sad thing is that there are so many people with quality talent who honored Michael, but look at what they chose. Although I see some people there who knew Michael and were his friends from childhood days, there is so many more people out there who should be present in a Michael tribute. However, the time will come when a true tribute will include the people we want, so I am hopeful.
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

It would have been better to talk about Vitiligo as the serious disorder it is. Then to just say to people "Look let's just forget about that and except and forgive him now cause he is dead." And making it out as Mj did it to himself but, "let's forgive the poor guy now!"
 
Last edited:
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

Ginviv I was having an intelligent debate and I noticed you crossed the line when you said "I bet you did not know.............." I am disappointed in you. I will not fight with people on a forum. You have now reduced it to a attack on self. I think I will move on now.


Blue I like your points on who should be in a tribute, and the sad thing is that there are so many people with quality talent who honored Michael, but look at what they chose. Although I see some people there who knew Michael and were his friends from childhood days, there is so many more people out there who should be present in a Michael tribute. However, the time will come when a true tribute will include the people we want, so I am hopeful.
I totally agree

the average black person, many felt MJ had sold out
yeah the ignorant ones
 
Re: Michael Forever Tribute/ MJJC Official Statement / Discussion / Estate statement / Fan letter @p

Petra, maybe it is better to move on. But the point still stands. You, by your own admission did not know who he was before. Yet you have come to a conclusion about who a person is based on misinformation. That is what many people have done. It is, what it is. And, many here have no problem doing that. They think it is ok. And they are steadfast in it, even when the information is corrected. I don't know how that can seem ok.

But as I said, we don't have to agree. Nor do we have to communicate further on the subject.

Have a good night! :) (And, that is said sincerely. No shade.)
 
Back
Top