Michael - The Official New Album - Out December 14th - General Discussion Thread

Which tracks are you most looking forward to hearing in full/Want on Album!

  • All I Need

    Votes: 13 14.0%
  • Carry On

    Votes: 16 17.2%
  • Breaking News

    Votes: 11 11.8%
  • Monster

    Votes: 13 14.0%
  • Much Too Soon

    Votes: 66 71.0%
  • Do You Know Where Your Children Are

    Votes: 68 73.1%
  • Another Day

    Votes: 76 81.7%
  • Hold My Hand

    Votes: 54 58.1%
  • A Place With No Name

    Votes: 65 69.9%
  • Love Never Felt So Good

    Votes: 34 36.6%
  • Blue Gangsta

    Votes: 57 61.3%

  • Total voters
    93
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Which car am I going to buy, hmmm, a TATA: ?

tata-nano-topper-472.jpg


or a BMW:

BMW-Vision-ED-Frankfurt.jpg


Whose new album am I going to buy, Susan Boyle's:

susan_boyle_1383642c.1239987446.jpg


or Michael's:

Michael+Jackson+BAD+Era+259.jpg


Ummm, help me out people.
http://bonnenouvelle.blog.lemonde.fr/files/2009/04/susan_boyle_1383642c.1239987446.jpg
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

The tata probably has better gas mileage, so with today's gas prices, I'd get that....but as far as music it's no contest....KOP all the way!
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

The tata probably has better gas mileage, so with today's gas prices, I'd get that....but as far as music it's no contest....KOP all the way!


The BMW that you see is fully electric, so if it's for gas's sake, go for the BMW.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

I can't believe how much some of you guys care about chart positions and sale figures....

Will you enjoy the music less if it only manages to reach number 2??
I agree. This is a gift to the fans (of course the estate wnats to make money as well) but Michael is not here anymore, let's say it goes #1 and sells millions in the first week, that's nice but what made it all special before is that Michael was here to see the reward of his hard work. He is not here to promote his music so don't expect too much, anything is a bonus.

I remember in 2007 when there were heavy rumors for an album that year I was very excited. Now Michael is not here to make any creative decisions. It's hard for me to get excited because the doctor that took Michael away forever is still free and there are many lingering questions.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

its Michael's kids that will also be enjoying it.
Maybe in the future, I doubt they care baout the chart position now. Michael's family has more important things to worry about. The album will sell but the kids will still be financially set whether it charts at 1 or at 10. Alot of other people will be celebrating though.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Maybe in the future, I doubt they care baout the chart position now. Michael's family has more important things to worry about. The album will sell but the kids will still be financially set whether it charts at 1 or at 10. Alot of other people will be celebrating though.

i wasnt talking about his chart position...but the $$$ that will be added to their trusts.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

i wasnt talking about his chart position...but the $$$ that will be added to their trusts.
My point still stands, they could probably care less about that right now. They already have a life's worth of money and money will always be generate to the estate in many ways, this stuff is jsut a bonus for them. Like I said many other people will be benefiting.
 
Last edited:
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

:smilerolleyes:

^"Meanwhile, merchants are skeptical on whether Jackson's album, expected to be compiled from studiotracks he recorded but never included on past albums, will top last year's "This Is It." "Of course Michael Jackson will be a very good seller; we sell his music all year long," Fry's Jaggi says. "Anything from him will sell." But a retail executive adds, "I don't believe the Michael Jackson album will mean anything."-_-:doh:


Are these people stupid?! How can they compare The soundtrack to the movie to new material? :mello: and how can someone say a new MJ album will "mean anything." Are these people for real....:hysterical:

Ikr! :D
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Which car am I going to buy, hmmm, a TATA: ?

tata-nano-topper-472.jpg


or a BMW:

BMW-Vision-ED-Frankfurt.jpg


Whose new album am I going to buy, Susan Boyle's:

susan_boyle_1383642c.1239987446.jpg


or Michael's:

Michael+Jackson+BAD+Era+259.jpg


Ummm, help me out people.


The BMW for sure.....and duh MJ'S ALBUM OF COURSE!!! :wild:
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Kanye West just just announced his new album will also be released November 22nd. His first single is coming out October 4th.

I still think its strange we have all these confirmed albums coming out in November yet we have absolutely no confirmation regarding the album by THE biggest star ever. If we get nothing by October 7th (8 days) then i highly doubt we'll be getting an album in November. (attack me all you want for saying that, but i think i have a right to feel frustrated).
 
Last edited:
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

All kanya (ego) west is trying to do is be the next mj. its going to hit him hard when he finds out aint no amount a shit he does going to reach Michael Jackson Status.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

LOL kanye would never match up 2 mj
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Im not comparing MJ to Kanye West. Im just saying its concerning to me that all these artists have announced there November album yet we STILL have nothing announced about MJs.
 
Last edited:
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

The BMW for sure.....and duh MJ'S ALBUM OF COURSE!!! :wild:
No, you buy that other car if you don't have money and Boyle's album if you have no brains. You decide, because you know yourself do you have money and do you have brains. But, if you have no brains you don't definitely know do you have money or do you have brains so you let someone else decide.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Im listening to For All Time and WOW..in a way its a real shame it was included on Thriller 25. I think it would have been the PERFECT song for the album, aswell as the album name.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

No, you buy that other car if you don't have money and Boyle's album if you have no brains. You decide, because you know yourself do you have money and do you have brains. But, if you have no brains you don't definitely know do you have money or do you have brains so you let someone else decide.


:huh: :blink:
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Kanye West just just announced his new album will also be released November 22nd. His first single is coming out October 4th.

I still think its strange we have all these confirmed albums coming out in November yet we have absolutely no confirmation regarding the album by THE biggest star ever. If we get nothing by October 7th (8 days) then i highly doubt we'll be getting an album in November. (attack me all you want for saying that, but i think i have a right to feel frustrated).

I thought Michael's album will be out 6th December..
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Im not comparing MJ to Kanye West. Im just saying its concerning to me that all these artists have announced there November album yet we STILL have nothing announced about MJs.

Michael isn't here to promote himself, most posthumous releases have different PR campaigns than other artists and their albums...It's really nothing to be alarmed over.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

No, you buy that other car if you don't have money and Boyle's album if you have no brains. You decide, because you know yourself do you have money and do you have brains. But, if you have no brains you don't definitely know do you have money or do you have brains so you let someone else decide.

If I don't have the money, I'd prefer to stay a pedestrian for safety reasons than buy a Tata. And even if I had enough money to buy a Tata, I'd rather buy another MJ's album than a Tata, at least the album has some value. As far as BMW is concerned, given the fact that it is fully electrical I bet that governments would encourage you to buy it either by reducing dramatically its price or through taxing system resulting in deducing your taxes for your ecological purchase.

Anyway, that BMW is Michael, compared to Tata Susan Boyle on all levels (vocal freedom, dance steps, compositions, music, business, aesthetic, art, and so on) -- no comparison possible. If people don't have brains, why fearing them? Pity them!
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Wow, i never thought about that.

Um...so what of that is true? if fans from one country buy albums all together in the same store at the same time, sales just don't count?
Or they only don't count if they are all bought from one person at the same time in the same store?



for clarification, this is how I understand the chart rules here in the UK. It might be different where you live, so it's worth checking.

If you personally buy multiple copies of the same album at the same time (all in one transaction and therefore all on one receipt) they won't count. I'm not sure what the threshold is, so these are just examples (for example It might be ok to buy 2 copies of an album at the same time, BUT PLEASE CHECK)

If 20 fans go to the same store, form a queue and each buy one album one-by-one, the sales WILL COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to the same store and one fan buys all the other fans one album each (i.e. 20 albums) on their own card, the sales WON'T COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to the same store and each buy 5 albums on their own cards, none of them WON'T COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to 5 different stores, buying one copy in each store, all sales WILL COUNT.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

for clarification, this is how I understand the chart rules here in the UK. It might be different where you live, so it's worth checking.

If you personally buy multiple copies of the same album at the same time (all in one transaction and therefore all on one receipt) they won't count. I'm not sure what the threshold is, so these are just examples (for example It might be ok to buy 2 copies of an album at the same time, BUT PLEASE CHECK)

If 20 fans go to the same store, form a queue and each buy one album one-by-one, the sales WILL COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to the same store and one fan buys all the other fans one album each (i.e. 20 albums) on their own card, the sales WON'T COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to the same store and each buy 5 albums on their own cards, none of them WON'T COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to 5 different stores, buying one copy in each store, all sales WILL COUNT.


I just don't get the maths here. Why wouldn't it count???

If the shop orders let's say 1000 units, and one fan buys all the units, the shop made good business by selling those units. So it will be obliged to re-order from its supplier (SONY) another shipment of 1000 or more units if the shop wants to go on with making good business.

The provider counts how many shipments they delivered (sold) to the retailers (shops).

So, if you buy one or two albums or a thousand, the results are always the same --the albums are SOLD. So what has that to do with the number of people buying them??????
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

Why the fuss over who's the better album, I'll be buying both albums, I think Susan Boyle is a great singer and she's British. I just enjoy music, whatever happens with chart success I don't care if its Susan or Take That at no.1, just doesn't interest me, I more bothered about enjoying Michael's album, hearing his voice looking forward to the new videos. November is going to be an exciting time, after all the heartache we've had to endure.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

for clarification, this is how I understand the chart rules here in the UK. It might be different where you live, so it's worth checking.

If you personally buy multiple copies of the same album at the same time (all in one transaction and therefore all on one receipt) they won't count. I'm not sure what the threshold is, so these are just examples (for example It might be ok to buy 2 copies of an album at the same time, BUT PLEASE CHECK)

If 20 fans go to the same store, form a queue and each buy one album one-by-one, the sales WILL COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to the same store and one fan buys all the other fans one album each (i.e. 20 albums) on their own card, the sales WON'T COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to the same store and each buy 5 albums on their own cards, none of them WON'T COUNT toward the chart.

If 20 fans go to 5 different stores, buying one copy in each store, all sales WILL COUNT.

Sorry but surely this is incorrect? If a till receipt shows you've bought ten copies of the same album, that has got to register somewhere with how many the store has sold other wise the store would be out of stock, and not making a profit etc
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

I just don't get the maths here. Why wouldn't it count???

If the shop orders let's say 1000 units, and one fan buys all the units, the shop made good business by selling those units. So it will be obliged to re-order from its supplier (SONY) another shipment of 1000 or more units if the shop wants to go on with making good business.

The provider counts how many shipments they delivered (sold) to the retailers (shops).

So, if you buy one or two albums or a thousand, the results are always the same --the albums are SOLD. So what has that to do with the number of people buying them??????


I don't understand this either. I thought all the copies people buy are counted no matter how many each person buys. I hope someone with the knowledge will explain it to us.
 
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only - ALL DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE

I just don't get the maths here. Why wouldn't it count???

If the shop orders let's say 1000 units, and one fan buys all the units, the shop made good business by selling those units. So it will be obliged to re-order from its supplier (SONY) another shipment of 1000 or more units if the shop wants to go on with making good business.

The provider counts how many shipments they delivered (sold) to the retailers (shops).

So, if you buy one or two albums or a thousand, the results are always the same --the albums are SOLD. So what has that to do with the number of people buying them??????


There is no maths to get because the numbers are made up.

Yes, additional sales, no matter how they are gained will be counted by the record company and will be reflected in their figures. Record companies often talk about shipments rather than actual sales anyway, or 'units' because those figures look better in the press releases.
Many people are rightly sceptical about any figures the record company or artist themselves publish because of the usual misrepresentation that accompanies them.

Certainly in the UK, the official charts company has measures in place to prevent chart corruption caused by bulk buying. This results in a credible chart, hopefully providing a general overview of what the population is buying. Affecting the charts by bulk buying has happened in the past, when record companies have arranged for additional sales in order to boost their artist's profile. Appearing successful by having higher chart positions can actually result in more people buying your product and create bigger longer term profit, though this is not guaranteed. One example I vaguely remember from years ago was when Victoria Beckham's record label bought multiple copies of her single.

Discounting sales due to bulk buying is a an attempt to prevent chart corruption. If many albums are discounted by the charts company due to bulk buying, that can reduce the chart position of the album, particularly where there is close competition between artists. In an extreme scenario, Artist A could sell way more copies of an album than Artist B, but because of chart rules (sales discounted because of bulk buying), Artist B could have the No.1 album in that country, not Artist A. See what I mean?


My simple point is this. Don't buy multiple albums at the same time because they will be discounted from chart statistics and therefore won't count...

My example is extreme because the chances of a mass fan-supported bulk buying campaign is unlikely.

I just didn't want people to buy multiple copies of an album in a misguided effort to help MJ's chart position when in actual fact their sales may not be counted.

even if you don't believe what I am saying, while you're in town, buy copies of the album from different shops, or from the same shop at different times. Order from different online companies. It's not much of an inconvenience is it?

I believe you can get away with ordering 3 copies of a single song in one day from itunes and it'll still count toward the chart, but I'm not 100% sure about that rule, or how it applies to album sales. Does anybody else have any knowledge on this?

Here is an extract from the OCC chart rules:

"1.0 Genuine Sales
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[/FONT]
[/FONT]1.1
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]All sales information used to compile the Chart must be recorded as a result of a genuine purchase by a genuine consumer. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]No record company, distributor, retailer, Artist or other party should act or encourage others to act in any way designed to distort, or which has the effect of distorting the Chart by achieving a higher or lower Chart position for a record than it would otherwise achieve. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]Actions which will be considered a breach of these rules include: [/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]a) promoting the sale of any album by supplying a dealer with records by another artist free of charge or upon terms more favourable than would be the case but for that promotion;
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]b) purchasing albums or causing albums to be purchased other than as a genuine consumer purchase;
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]c) multiple purchases of albums on behalf of other persons,
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]d) interference with the operation of sales recording machines or other equipment or computer software used to compile the Charts or collect or collate its information or in any other way being a party to the submission of false or inaccurate data to the Chart compiler;
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]e) offering money or other benefits to a dealer contingent upon an album entering any of the Charts or attaining a minimum chart position;
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]f) procuring the sale of an album in conjunction with a non-related or excessive gift, ie which gives the consumer a product, voucher or benefit or anything else which is either unrelated to the album concerned or of a value in excess of the value of the record without that gift (value means normal retail price), where it is not an album and merchandise package as outlined in section 8.0.
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]g) any other activity intended unfairly to influence Chart positions.
[/FONT]
[/FONT][FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]Where the Official Charts Company has reason to believe that an album is the subject of any of the above types of activity, it will, at its discretion, either remove identifiable irregular sales transactions from the data used to compile the Chart, or exclude the record from the Chart with immediate effect. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]The Official Charts Company‟s nominated chart compiler will ensure the accuracy and completeness of any sales information provided to it by a retail outlet in the sample to the extent it is possible to do so using Good Industry Practice. Where the nominated chart compiler has reason to believe that the inclusion of sales from a retail outlet or a number of retail outlets maybe inaccurate, misleading or incomplete and run contrary to the guidelines expected by a skilled and experienced market research firm, then the store(s) in question will be excluded from the sample to avoid potential distortion. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]If an album is excluded from the Chart, the Official Charts Company will inform the record company, distributor, ERA and the BPI in writing on the first working day after the exclusion takes effect. If unusual or irregular sales transactions cause the Official Charts Company to remove data from the Chart sample, the Official Charts Company will inform the Secretariat of the BPI and/or ERA, as appropriate, on the first working day after the data is removed. [/FONT][/FONT]

"




I am not going to post on this subject any more unless there is something useful to add because I'm not an expert and I feel that what was a simple point has turned into something more complicated than it really is.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top