Michael - The Great Album Debate

Does he say all this in that clip? I skimmed through it and listened to it on crappy speakers and therefore could not make out most of it right now, but from what I did get I did not hear him say anything about JM? Where in the clip does he say that?
Yes he says all of this and mentions Jason Malachi aswell. It's in the first part of the interview that is 47mins long of different questions about his book aswell. So the link u proably watch is part two that is only 13mins. In the 13mins part 2 video he is answering another question about the MJ album! Saying No pics nor cameras was used and they don't have to film or take pics all the time. Plus saying Sony and the Estate wouldn't do this and yadda yadda.


Here is part 1 at 23:50mins is where the first question about the Michael Album start:
 
Last edited:
This is all I need to post, I let it speak for itself.
Listen to Soldier Boy, then listen to this.

http://soundcloud.com/pentum/do-i-do-hq-snippet-aca

Same whiny, yelping voice, same goaty vibrato, same falsetto/head voice, even the "dah" sounds like one of the dahs that are not copy pasted in Breaking News.

Oh , i hate this guy. Wish he'd banish from the Earth together with all his recordings.
 
thanks for posting this interview.

this guy is floating down the river--DENIAL.

i have 2 favorite parts:

1) Interviewer: "do you feel that the final mix of breaking news and the leaked version of breaking news are very different?'
Frank:"Oh, yes." and then later he says "the breaking news you heard? that was leaked? think about it." really? really frank? What should i be thinking about exactly? the fact that they were note for note identical?

2) I loved the part where referring to credits of t25 as proof of . . . what exactly?

Every part of this interview where he's talking about the Michael CD makes my skin crawl. the part where he's like "I wrote this book." and then jokingly: "this book was co-written by jason malachi." Ya guess who didn't laugh at that? Me. not effing funny, man. Not funny. don't mock us.

i love that these fans are so relentless.
 
A good singer knows how to flow which is a common-used word in Hip Hop music.
You can’t make a song flow through studio magic which can help make a better record just like what SoCav explained.
Cascio tracks got that flow,but JM (Jason Malachi) tracks have nothing.
Actually I’m OK with all kinds of opnions on this certain issue.I really do.
One side don’t need to see the other side as monster as long as we love and respect each other.
Please separate the opinions from people’s personalities.
 
Call me crazy but, I do believe the BN leak is the same BN on the album no? And honestly Frank kinda let it slip it wasn't really MJ when he confirmed he too thought it was not Mike when he heard it the first time. Now why would he say something like that about his brothers work in the first place? And why defend Sony in the end when they allegedly according to him released the wrong version of BN? o_O

Anyways the poor guy is trying to defend his blood Eddie SMH. The feel I got from the interview was that he and Eddie got issues stemming way back from 05 when the trial was happening as he also mentions. So as much as Frank bitches about the Jacksons he to likes to put up the unity front for his family aswell IMO.
 
thanks for posting this interview.

this guy is floating down the river--DENIAL.

i have 2 favorite parts:

1) Interviewer: "do you feel that the final mix of breaking news and the leaked version of breaking news are very different?'
Frank:"Oh, yes." and then later he says "the breaking news you heard? that was leaked? think about it." really? really frank? What should i be thinking about exactly? the fact that they were note for note identical?

2) I loved the part where referring to credits of t25 as proof of . . . what exactly?

Every part of this interview where he's talking about the Michael CD makes my skin crawl. the part where he's like "I wrote this book." and then jokingly: "this book was co-written by jason malachi." Ya guess who didn't laugh at that? Me. not effing funny, man. Not funny. don't mock us.

i love that these fans are so relentless.


And we ARE gonna be relentless. No way this Cascio thing gets flushed down the history without providing more info. Frank seems clueless though. I can understand that he defends his brother, but we are going to defend MJ's legacy.

Those who naively thought that people have forgotten about those tracks and moved on had just the proof in front of their eyes that the fans all around the world have certainly not forgotten and cannot move on without answering their questions.
 
Yes he says all of this and mentions Jason Malachi aswell. It's in the first part of the interview that is 47mins long of different questions about his book aswell. So the link u proably watch is part two that is only 13mins. In the 13mins part 2 video he is answering another question about the MJ album! Saying No pics nor cameras was used and they don't have to film or take pics all the time. Plus saying Sony and the Estate wouldn't do this and yadda yadda.


Here is part 1 at 23:50mins is where the first question about the Michael Album start:
COME ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HE IS SAYING HE DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS MICAHEL SINGING IN THE LEAKED VERSION OF BREAKING NEWS WHICH SOUNDS ALMOST EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE ALBUM VERSION!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You can tell that he doesn't like to lie and tries to avoid it, but it's not easy. He has full confident when saying that Michael did record and dance in their house, which none of us doubt, right? But the Cascio songs on the other hand.

No pictures, no videos according to him.

Woah.
 
Looooool! The version that leaked was very different from the version on the final album???????? And he himself said "who's singing that?" Wow. Wow. Wow. looool, what a nonsense.

No matter Frank's opinion, at least he has the guts to come forward and talk.
 
Last edited:
Frank Cascio being interviewed by the fans in Paris. Some inconvenient questions about the "Michael" album are asked. Of course he's as vague as possible.


INTERVIEW DE FRANCK CASCIO - FNAC DES HALLES -... przez mikeneufdeux

Fantastic. Look how scared he gets when he has to start lying. He makes me sick.

Also, Frank is a co-writer on some of the Porte versions, including Soldier Boy. Joe Vogel talks about Frank's involvement in his book. He is lying here. He is a liar.

I don't suppose the quality is good enough to have it looked at by a body language expert like the guy who does MJ interviews on youtube?

Also, we pretty much now have an admission that they have no proof. Kind of blows away the idea that they have proof but are holding it back eh?
 
Last edited:
Fantastic. Look how scared he gets when he has to start lying. He makes me sick.

Also, Frank is a co-writer on some of the Porte versions, including Soldier Boy. He is lying here. He is a liar.

I don't suppose the quality is good enough to have it looked at by a body language expert like the guy who does MJ interviews on youtube?


Analysis?

-Frank claims it is Michael Jackson on those 3 songs.
-Frank claims he was wondering who was singing when Breaking News leaked (actually streamed).
-Frank claims the album version is extremely different from the streamed one.

Conclusion: he either has no clue what's really going on or he's simply defending his brother Eddie.
 
Analysis?

-Frank claims it is Michael Jackson on those 3 songs.
-Frank claims he was wondering who was singing when Breaking News leaked (actually streamed).
-Frank claims the album version is extremely different from the streamed one.

Conclusion: he either has no clue what's really going on or he's simply defending his brother Eddie.

He's lying. It's obvious from his behaviour. He's actually falling back on the same old excuses. Perhaps he can explain why the vocals that are on the songs do not appear at all in the June 27th registration, but in fact don't appear until the April 2010 registrations?
 
From an interview conducted by Richard Lecocq from MJ Databank: (Translated directly, and badly, from French)

MJJNews.fr: The CD Michael: What was your involvement in these securities? What can you tell people who do recognize the voice of "James Gate" than Michael leads in songs?

Frank Cascio: Ok, my name is Frank Cascio and I have a brother named Eddie Cascio and .... "We Are Two Different People" (referring to the phrase of Michael alongside Janet at the Grammy Awards in 1993, Ed). I have nothing to do with this disc. I have no financial motivation and have nothing to do with it. I know that tomorrow (the interview took place June 5, 2012, Ed) I'll meet fans who want me to throw tomatoes, but I do not have to defend something I do not have to defend, but I can tell you is that it is Michael who sings on this disc. And if you read the credits, you will see that the recording studio is the same as that used for the remixes of Thriller 25. All this is unfortunate because the album could be successful. But because of these stories, it was not the case. I ask you just read between the lines. (...) Do you think Sony and the Estate take the risk of releasing a record without Michael's voice on it? They hired two experts to study the songs and both have confirmed that it was him. The songs were recorded when Michael got back to work. The only thing I am guilty of is having convinced Michael to return to the studio to create music and to dance again. I remotivé and showed him he could be himself and relax. It was a long "process". My brother had to go to London and build a studio to work with Michael there (for This Is It, Ed). That's what I can tell you ... "That's life" (in French, Ed).

MJJNews.fr: Personally what do you think the three songs that have created controversy?

Frank Cascio: I like Keep Your Head Up and it's one of the best songs on the album. I do my best to answer you but it would be to my brother Eddie to do so.

MJJNews.fr: What was the involvement of John McClain in the preparation of this CD?

Frank Cascio: I love John Branca and Michael did well to put it in there Estate because it handles things well. John and Michael may have had their differences over the years. But both have made ​​history, they purchased the entire Beatles catalog. Once a case was complicated surface, called John Michael to take things in hand. As for John McClain, I am reminded of an anecdote: one day he came to see me on the set of You Rock My World, saying: "Frank, you must blacken the skin of Michael and put the dough on the nose ... "And I said:" I do not think it's a good idea, if you want to say, go ahead, I do not tell him. And I suggest you not to do. " And you talk ... I got a call from Karen Faye asking me to come urgently. Michael's was locked in his dressing room and he had all broken after John McClain has finally said what he wanted to tell him. I knocked on the door several times and finally Michael opened. He was sitting on the floor, his hands on his face, crying like a baby. And I felt so bad for him. He said: "What a crazy team. Is what I'm strange to you? I did not tell them how they should be, me ... Let them go to hell, I cancel the shoot today and I canceled everything. " He cried. I could not believe it. How people could afford to say such things. If John really knew Michael would never have done that. (...) John played double game is never of course, I respect it for its place within the Estate. But I am aware of this animosity towards me because of my surname. He played double game could not stand to see me in the entourage of Michael, he took my name and has turned against brother. Eddie must have had six songs on the album, and John wanted to put in too. Again, read between the lines and this is only my opinion ...

MJJNews.fr: In the end, this story has brought controversy in the music of Michael, which was not the case in his lifetime. What do you think?

Frank Cascio: It should not have to be this way. It's sad because it's a good album, a compilation of good music. I learned one thing in life is that it is difficult to make everybody happy. I try to make everyone happy but that is impossible. And in the end it's me who suffers. I know how much Michael loved his fans. All I know is that my book helps preserve the legacy of Michael as Michael would have liked. He has so tried to explain who he was, but he did not know how. He said he wanted to make the world understand who he was. And there was this story with Martin Bashir .... But he tried. And it was stabbed in the back.

Interview by Richard Lecocq for MJJNews.fr / MJ data bank / Photo: Cristiane Montenegro / Saykou Diallo / (C) 2012 MJJNews.fr. All rights reserved.

http://mjdatabank.com/mjjnews/wordpress/2012/06/08/exclusif-frank-cascio-linterview-12/

At least we now have confirmation that Michael did indeed the Thriller 25 vocals in that basement, which just to go prove the point even further as they sound absolutely nothing like the Cascio tracks.
 
Last edited:
Fantastic. Look how scared he gets when he has to start lying. He makes me sick.

Also, Frank is a co-writer on some of the Porte versions, including Soldier Boy. Joe Vogel talks about Frank's involvement in his book. He is lying here. He is a liar.

I don't suppose the quality is good enough to have it looked at by a body language expert like the guy who does MJ interviews on youtube?

Also, we pretty much now have an admission that they have no proof. Kind of blows away the idea that they have proof but are holding it back eh?



Those songs that Frank were involved in were meant for Porte though. If you've followed and believe the story, Frank started working on those songs for Porte's album, meaning he was fully aware of who the singer is supposed to be. The songs never made it to Porte's album, then supposedly Eddie got hold of them and this happened. Frank is only credited for the early sessions of these songs, therefore I don't think he had anything to do with whatever Eddie and whoever else produced into a final product.
 
Those songs that Frank were involved in were meant for Porte though. If you've followed and believe the story, Frank started working on those songs for Porte's album, meaning he was fully aware of who the singer is supposed to be. The songs never made it to Porte's album, then supposedly Eddie got hold of them and this happened. Frank is only credited for the early sessions of these songs, therefore I don't think he had anything to do with whatever Eddie and whoever else produced into a final product.

But the fact remains that he is covering up for his brother. That makes him just as guilty. And for him to sit there throwing the blame at the family instead of answering any of the difficult questions goes to show what a coward he is. The version of Breaking News that leaked is IDENTICAL to the mix on the album and he knows that. He is a liar. A coward and a backstabbing liar.
 
Kind of blows away the idea that they have proof but are holding it back eh?

many sources have already said there's no definitive proof - i.e: video

Conclusion: he either has no clue what's really going on or he's simply defending his brother Eddie.

in his book he already said that he and his brother had a falling out and they didn't make up until after the death of Michael. He also said he wasn't living in the house and he only visited. If you go back months ago - when his book was published- I had already said he didn't have any first hand knowledge or involvement in the songs.

And funny that some of you are just now realizing what has been said and have been obvious for a long time.
 
many sources have already said there's no definitive proof - i.e: video



in his book he already said that he and his brother had a falling out and they didn't make up until after the death of Michael. He also said he wasn't living in the house and he only visited. If you go back months ago - when his book was published- I had already said he didn't have any first hand knowledge or involvement in the songs.

And funny that some of you are just now realizing what has been said and have been obvious for a long time.

Nobody talked about Frank in this thread, but about Ed, Eddie & Teddy. This interview in Paris's Fnac store is just something came up right now.

It does not change the fact that his statement regarding Breaking News is a nonsense, no matter what he had said in his book. His book is not the debate here.
 
Nobody talked about Frank in this thread, but about Ed, Eddie & Teddy. This interview in Paris's Fnac store is just something came up right now.

It does not change the fact that his statement regarding Breaking News is a nonsense, no matter what he had said in his book. His book is not the debate here.

Agreed his book is totally irrelevant. The fact is that he is a provable liar in that video when he says the Breaking News that streamed was different.
 
many sources have already said there's no definitive proof - i.e: video



in his book he already said that he and his brother had a falling out and they didn't make up until after the death of Michael. He also said he wasn't living in the house and he only visited. If you go back months ago - when his book was published- I had already said he didn't have any first hand knowledge or involvement in the songs.

And funny that some of you are just now realizing what has been said and have been obvious for a long time.

Why aren't you commenting about how his act changes when he gets asked about the Cascio songs, and that he said he didn't know who sang the leaked BN version?
 
What sources?

sources. even if you go with roger friedman he said work tapes which was discussion about the songs and teddy said handwritten notes and text messages. no one ever mentioned a video.

Nobody talked about Frank in this thread, but about Ed, Eddie & Teddy. This interview in Paris's Fnac store is just something came up right now.

no one talked about Frank? ahahahahaa okay. Stella had rushed to write what Frank said about the songs in his book and it was discussed in detail here as well. I wrote the exact same thing I wrote above months and months ago. So keep thinking this is "just" received information.

everything he said - not only he's not being involved in the songs but also including his problems with McClain and how he believed he went after Eddie and how some people / Jacksons turned against them - is in his book. He's not saying anything new.

Why aren't you commenting about how his act changes when he gets asked about the Cascio songs, and that he said he didn't know who sang the leaked BN version?

I haven't listened to the interview and do not plan to. What he says or thinks makes no difference as he's a third person with no first hand knowledge. He's just giving an opinion, he might or might not think the songs are Michael. Just because his last name is "Cascio" it doesn't give his opinion any more weight or correctness as he multiple times stated he had no involvement or first hand knowledge. He might or might not know anything about Breaking News stream and could be just repeating what's being said about the wrong mix. It's no different than Paris JACKSON thinking Hollywood Tonight is not Michael. Surnames and being related to parties involved do not mean a thing unless they have the knowledge/involvement to talk about the issue at hand.

When you have Eddie commenting, we'll talk.
 
sources. even if you go with roger friedman he said work tapes which was discussion about the songs and teddy said handwritten notes and text messages. no one ever mentioned a video.



no one talked about Frank? ahahahahaa okay. Stella had rushed to write what Frank said about the songs in his book and it was discussed in detail here as well. I wrote the exact same thing I wrote above months and months ago. So keep thinking this is "just" received information.

everything he said - not only he's not being involved in the songs but also including his problems with McClain and how he believed he went after Eddie and how some people / Jacksons turned against them - is in his book. He's not saying anything new.



I haven't listened to the interview and do not plan to. What he says or thinks makes no difference as he's a third person with no first hand knowledge. He's just giving an opinion, he might or might not think the songs are Michael. Just because his last name is "Cascio" it doesn't give his opinion any more weight or correctness as he multiple times stated he had no involvement or first hand knowledge. He might or might not know anything about Breaking News stream and could be just repeating what's being said about the wrong mix. It's no different than Paris JACKSON thinking Hollywood Tonight is not Michael. Surnames and being related to parties involved do not mean a thing unless they have the knowledge/involvement to talk about the issue at hand.

When you have Eddie commenting, we'll talk.

Exactly, no one ever denied there was a video until now. Now if Frank is so far removed from this situation then how would he know there is no video?

And Eddie will never comment because he has too much to hide.
 
Exactly, no one ever denied there was a video until now.

why would they ever deny a video when they never claimed it existed in the first place?

Rumors of video or expectation of video was nothing more than fan wish / fan rumors. It seems that Frank might be aware of what is being written / said and he might have answered in such way.


Now if Frank is so far removed from this situation then how would he know there is no video?

do not mix up with first hand knowledge with what he's being told. To me it's clear that Frank had no involvement with the recording of the songs in 2007 or the release of the songs. It doesn't mean that he didn't talk to his brother Eddie later on / after the fact and Eddie told him "we didn't record any video" and "there was a mix up with the streamed song" and Frank today is just repeating those.

Frank's opinion about the events has also been clear from his book. He had documented his disagreements with McClain going back to 2001 and he stated he believed those had resulted in a Anti- Cascio campaign. I'm reading that he's still mentioning the same belief in the Q&A.
 
sources. even if you go with roger friedman he said work tapes which was discussion about the songs and teddy said handwritten notes and text messages. no one ever mentioned a video.



no one talked about Frank? ahahahahaa okay. Stella had rushed to write what Frank said about the songs in his book and it was discussed in detail here as well. I wrote the exact same thing I wrote above months and months ago. So keep thinking this is "just" received information.

everything he said - not only he's not being involved in the songs but also including his problems with McClain and how he believed he went after Eddie and how some people / Jacksons turned against them - is in his book. He's not saying anything new.



I haven't listened to the interview and do not plan to. What he says or thinks makes no difference as he's a third person with no first hand knowledge. He's just giving an opinion, he might or might not think the songs are Michael. Just because his last name is "Cascio" it doesn't give his opinion any more weight or correctness as he multiple times stated he had no involvement or first hand knowledge. He might or might not know anything about Breaking News stream and could be just repeating what's being said about the wrong mix. It's no different than Paris JACKSON thinking Hollywood Tonight is not Michael. Surnames and being related to parties involved do not mean a thing unless they have the knowledge/involvement to talk about the issue at hand.

When you have Eddie commenting, we'll talk.

I had a "hahahaha" moment when you were talking about planting seeds of doubt.

Again, when Frank is mentioned, he was mentioned regarding the songs, not regarding his book. Out of 40 minutes video with Frank on it, we're only talking about few minutes of the song controversy.

He said nonsense, and here you go with somehting which has nothing to do with the authenticity of the songs.

Frank clearly said that the streamed version of Brekaing News is completely different from the album version. Why don't you comment on that? I don't know what kind of superhuman ears he has to hear that "enormous" difference between the streamed Breaking News and the album version. I don't hear that drastic difference at all after months of relentless listening.

That's why I said, either he has no clues or he simply defends his brother by talking nonsense. Now, is your comment supposed to correct someone in here or simply to defend him for talking nonsense about the Cascio songs?
 
Last edited:
Frank clearly said that the streamed version of Brekaing News is completely different from the album version. Why don't you comment on that? I don't know what kind of superhuman ears he has to hear that "enormous" difference between the streamed Breaking News and the album version. I don't hear that drastic difference at all after months of relentless listening.
Someone either here or on Max Jax (Pentum? Or maybe it was Geso?) compared the waveforms of the early stream and then the supposed 'new track' that was streamed a week or so later. This is the mix some fans referred to when they claimed that Sony uploaded a new mix and that they now could hear Michael. I already found that quite bizarre at the time, because it sounded exactly the same.

The poster showed that the waveforms were indeed identical. Both version were exactly the same.
 
What Frank was doing in 2007 is irrelevant. We know the songs were recorded in late 09/early 2010 because that's the timeline that fits and April 2010 is when the Malachi vocals first appear. He is simply covering up for his brother and throwing ridiculous ideas out there in the process.
 
Back
Top