kopwatcher
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 769
- Points
- 0
Genius :rofl:Bonus track: Salvation Army Tomorrow, Bill (Don't Laugh, You Find Good Stuff)
Genius :rofl:Bonus track: Salvation Army Tomorrow, Bill (Don't Laugh, You Find Good Stuff)
Tracklist of the next album:
1. Weee
2. Burn Tonight
3. Fist In My Ear
4. I Love To Tour
5. Water
6. Black Widow
7. Bathe In The Moonlight
8. L. O. V. E.
We need more gifs in this thread:Oh, and....My avatar is actually the next single's cover for: I Just Took A Shower (And Washed My Hair Thoroughly)
I heard many unreleased songs.
Since they are stolen songs and since the leak can ruin sales for example Hold My Hand did not hit #1 on the Billboard 200 due to the leak I'm against leaks but like everyone else I enjoy the song.
Don't know James Porte collaborated with Luther Vandross. The song is nice. Not Dancing With My Father, but still a good song.
I see your point but let me explain. Sony purchased the songs via a deal that was brokered between Eddie Cascio and Frank Dileo. They saw no reason to doubt either party. This purchase happened sometime in the summer. It wasn't until much later (October) that things started to kick off when someone identified Jason Cupeta as the possible vocalist. It is not known who it was that first suggested Jason as a possibility. This is what caused John Branca to contact Thad Nauden who represents Jason on the 18th October. Obviously the purpose of this call was to ask if Jason had been involved and clearly Nauden denied it. Nauden received another call (possibly from Howard Weitzemann) on the following day. And then, on October 20th, Nauden was contacted by the VP of Marketing and A & R for Sony Music.
That phone call appears to be all that Sony did to investigate the songs. There is no proof that any so called tests ever took place, and if they did, then the people doing the tests would have been paid by Sony. Without more information those tests are completely irrelevant.
I agree with what you are saying (especially the last paragraph), but it just seems to me that Sony played a part in it. We definately don't have proof that the tests ever took place. However, Sony's threatening actions over the past year makes it seem like they're taking extra strides to hide things. And the one that pasted together those vocals had to get the acapellas from somewhere. And that they chose Breaking News to be the debut single. It all just seems suspicious.
Of course, it's all just speculation.
Well it's been like 10 years MJ only so yeah I'm not gonna stop now.That action of his in TII was that of an experienced artist, who knew how to capture/impress/play his audience. I'm pretty sure he didn't had the song Burn Tonight in mind.
The Cascio singer doesn't refer to a jacket when he sings: 'We can make it burn tonight".
Hope it's a temporary thing, because, although Michael is one of the best, there are many other great artists which can give you a lot of joy listening to...:chillin: And Michael himself also didn't limit himself to only one artist or genre. He listened to a lot of different artists and styles.
Can you please write the titles of the songs ?Honestly, I have no issue with leaks. Contrary to popular relief, leaks don't drive down sales. In this day and age, singles and even a whole album are almost always leaked before official release. Madonna's new single was leaked months in advance.
HMH didn't become #1 was not completely because of it being leaked. It's heard only within fan community. The general public was not aware of the song. HMH was not sufficiently promoted.
I asked whether you have heard BG, DYKWYCA and STTR and whether you have problem in commenting on them because the above mentioned songs are stolen songs as well. So, if people do not mind commenting on how much they enjoy them, they should have no problem in commenting on the Cascio tracks. If they have problem in commenting on the Cascio tracks, but not STTR, then the issue is not the way the songs are obtained, but something else.
This is why I cannot take many doubters serious.Tracklist of the next album:
1. Weee
2. Burn Tonight
3. Fist In My Ear
4. I Love To Tour
5. Water
6. Black Widow
7. Bathe In The Moonlight
8. L. O. V. E.
Can you please write the titles of the songs ?
Thanks I was thinking what was STTRSure.
HMH - Hold My Hand
BG - Blye Gangsta
DYKWYCA - Do You Know Where Your Children Are
STTR - Slave To The Rhythm
Sure was! Rumour has it that 'Weeee' is the lead single of the next album.
I would say Sony's actions now are based on damage control.
Worst lyric = "Let me in this wonderland with youuuuuuuuuuuu"
Also,
MJ = Michael Jackson
KOP = King Of Pop
Next time I will not ask if I will get stupid replies by some of you.Also:
PYT = Pretty Young Thing
TLC = Tender Love Care
D.S. = Tom Sneddon
BLT = Bacon Lettuce Tomato
UN = United Nations
U.S.A. = United States of America
E.U. = European Union
U.K. = United Kingdom
I was standing in the rain makes sense in the context of the song, I'll be standing in the rain, case you etc, etc....doesn't.This song was written by James Porte and Luther Vandross. Notice the similar lyrics to Stay: "I was standing in the rain."/"I'll be standing in the rain."
[youtube]enPVvEhCPdw[/youtube]
Ok, there are worse habits, lol.Well it's been like 10 years MJ only so yeah I'm not gonna stop now.
double post
triple post
#1. Facts Don't Change Our Minds
That is why confirmation bias exists. We read a news article that supports what we believe, and we add it to the "I'm right about this" column. News articles that contradict what we believe are dismissed. We make up a reason -- maybe the source is part of the conspiracy from the other side or whatever it takes to make sure the "I'm wrong about this" column remains empty.
Researchers have done experiments where they hooked up people's brains to scanners and then made them read a story pointing out something stupid their favorite candidate said. The logical parts of the brain stayed quiet, while the emotional parts of the brain lit up. Their brains were weighing the story, not based on what it logically meant for their position, but on the emotional/social consequences of that position being wrong.
Then, once the brain had decided that this news story being right would mean pain and humiliation for the reader, it told the logical part, "Figure out a way to use your 'logic' stuff to make this pain go away." The next day, you probably heard those test subjects at the coffee shop going on and on about how biased the press is against their guy.