Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)
Hi I have been reading here a lot but I don't post much anymore. I lost the drive to sing after my band broke up over a year ago. Recently, I took up an offer to write and record some songs. I pulled out my guitar and realised my voice isn't sounding too great! I'm out of practice, sharp and shaky in places but the tone of my voice is the exact same. The way I pronounce things is the same, all of my habits, breaks for breath, everything is the exact same. I have clips of myself on a normal day, after a few drinks (and after too many drinks :blush, with a cold, with no sleep, on old tape recorders, with a computer mic, on amateur recording systems, in a professional studio (rough and finished versions), and they all sound like my voice. In my opinion, the voice on the Cascio tracks doesn't sound like Michael out of practice or using amateur equipment, it sounds like a completely different person.
I'm aware of the editing that can be done to vocals but they don't change the way someone pronounces something or the little habits they have. You would have to make a drastic change to change the tone of someone's voice and in that case, would you be making the same drastic changes to all of the Cascio tracks? Would they all need such extreme, voice altering pitch changes (or whatever other changes) and if they did, would they all result in the exact same altered voice?
The voice on the Cascio tracks all sound like the same person, imo. If the raw, unedited vocal tracks had Michael sounding like Michael and all the tracks were edited for their purpose (maybe some pitch altered, some sped up, slowed down, etc) would they all sound like the same voice we hear on all of the Cascio tracks? It's very unlikely that they would all need to be pitched down one step and sped up 3% (for example) but isn't that the only way that the vocal tracks on each song could be changed so that they would all end up sounding like the same person in the finished product?
I'm also hounded by damn logic. It seems so unlikely that they would do this. But logic isn't always the way to the right answer. People do illogical things all the time. Any logical thoughts and doubts I might have about the Cascio situation go straight out the window when I hear the tracks.
I enjoy reading the debate threads, by the way. You all raise great points. I just wanted to throw my two cents in
Hi I have been reading here a lot but I don't post much anymore. I lost the drive to sing after my band broke up over a year ago. Recently, I took up an offer to write and record some songs. I pulled out my guitar and realised my voice isn't sounding too great! I'm out of practice, sharp and shaky in places but the tone of my voice is the exact same. The way I pronounce things is the same, all of my habits, breaks for breath, everything is the exact same. I have clips of myself on a normal day, after a few drinks (and after too many drinks :blush, with a cold, with no sleep, on old tape recorders, with a computer mic, on amateur recording systems, in a professional studio (rough and finished versions), and they all sound like my voice. In my opinion, the voice on the Cascio tracks doesn't sound like Michael out of practice or using amateur equipment, it sounds like a completely different person.
I'm aware of the editing that can be done to vocals but they don't change the way someone pronounces something or the little habits they have. You would have to make a drastic change to change the tone of someone's voice and in that case, would you be making the same drastic changes to all of the Cascio tracks? Would they all need such extreme, voice altering pitch changes (or whatever other changes) and if they did, would they all result in the exact same altered voice?
The voice on the Cascio tracks all sound like the same person, imo. If the raw, unedited vocal tracks had Michael sounding like Michael and all the tracks were edited for their purpose (maybe some pitch altered, some sped up, slowed down, etc) would they all sound like the same voice we hear on all of the Cascio tracks? It's very unlikely that they would all need to be pitched down one step and sped up 3% (for example) but isn't that the only way that the vocal tracks on each song could be changed so that they would all end up sounding like the same person in the finished product?
I'm also hounded by damn logic. It seems so unlikely that they would do this. But logic isn't always the way to the right answer. People do illogical things all the time. Any logical thoughts and doubts I might have about the Cascio situation go straight out the window when I hear the tracks.
I enjoy reading the debate threads, by the way. You all raise great points. I just wanted to throw my two cents in