Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)
First and foremost importantly
And yet you want to claim that 3T might have malicious intents?
sometimes I wonder if my posts are even read carefully. To be clear I
didn't claim anything. My point was we don't personally know any of the parties involved and we
cannot be sure about their intentions. They can be good , they can be bad - none of us know it for sure.
The others were examples to show that easily an opposite argument could be made as well - again goes to the point that "none of us know anything for certain".
Is there any evidence to suggest that Taryll knows or has anything to do with the Cascio's? No. So, you're just pulling ideas out of thin air.
Taryll on his twitter said bad things about Cascio's personality and behavior. so yeah he has an predetermined negative opinion about Cascio's by his own admittance.
Regarding Cory and Taryll's song.... do you see them attacking Akon? Lenny Kravitz? Neff-U? The Cascio songs represent only 30% of the album.
do you realize that all the other people and the songs are from professionally known famous musicians and only these 3 are from unknown (in the music industry) Eddie Cascio and James Porte. the above example is like comparing apples to oranges.
But to even suggest that a third generation family member would even dare to try and take advantage is RIDICULOUS. That they might exploit their uncle for their own personal gain? PLEASE. These guys might be least malicious adults in the whole family.
Again I didn't make any claims I said that you simply cannot know for sure. There's no rule that says because someone are third generation they must be angels, similarly there's no rule that says because someone released a song after MJ's death, they must be opportunistic liars.
Of course you are entitled to your opinion but please do not present it as an indisputable fact. As I provided an example in the past post it's possible to make an argument for the contrary.
Irrelevant point. Both Taj and Jackie have a say in the Estate. They are the ONLY family members that do. If you read the album credits you'll see both of their names in the list of people that assist the Estate, and they are the only family members listed.
You didn't understand me - estate executors get 5% from each deal they bring in. I'm sure Taryll or Jackie doesn't get 5% of the money and what I meant was the bid to "remove the executors" to get the 5% fee. Plus why would money be an acceptable motive for Cascio and Teddy etc and not for Jackson's?
kreen - 3T don't have anything to prove. They aren't the ones selling questionable vocals for millions of dollars with no evidence. That's why.
again not to sound like a broken record - legally speaking if 3T is the one who are making the claims they are ones required to prove it.
Ivy, thank you so much for your response. Again, it's not my intention to challege you, so the question at the end is somewhat unnecessary.
oh I didn't mean it in a negative way. I meant to ask if you need any more detailed explanation. hopefully we wouldn't have any misunderstandings.
The doubters do not attack necessarily anyone as we don't know who's fault it is in this whole mess. We simply defend the idea that we don't hear Michael on those tracks.
Perhaps you don't attack anyone but I have especially seen Cascio's being called everything under the sun by some doubters.
