Michael - The Great Album Debate

Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Actually, instead of just believing it, why not just take one of MJ's songs and Melodyne it to sound like Malachi? I've been asking for this from Day 1. This ONE act would shut down ALL debate...and that's what we all want.

Nobody has done it because it isn't possible. Melodyne doesn't change the tone of someone's voice or make them pronounce words differently. Furthermore, there's a limit to what you can do, and what I mean by that is that you can only do so much before the vocal is OBVIOUSLY overly processed and sounds completely unnatural. And by "unnatural" I don't mean sounding like a different person. I mean just stupid sounding, glitchy, shifting from note to note in a way that isn't even humanly possible, etc. It just sounds like garbage, like hitting random notes on a keyboard and expecting it to sound like a melody. These Cascio vocals are not "overly processed", because they are regular melodies that are possible for anyone to sing without much effort. They really haven't been processed much at all. There's a small amount of autotune, a small amount of Melodyne, and the rest is regular compression, reverb and EQ. That's it.



How can you be so sure about such thing?

Do we know what might have happened between Taryll and Cascio's first of all?

Furthermore by Corey Rooney's own facebook post he and Taryll had a song that didn't make the cut. Who's to say that Taryll wouldn't benefit from starting a campaign against Cascio songs so that they wouldn't be included in the future albums due to the controversy and his song would have a higher chance to be included in the future releases? Or couldn't it be anger because his song didn't make the cut but Cascio's 3 songs did?

Is there any evidence to suggest that Taryll knows or has anything to do with the Cascio's? No. So, you're just pulling ideas out of thin air.

Regarding Cory and Taryll's song.... do you see them attacking Akon? Lenny Kravitz? Neff-U? The Cascio songs represent only 30% of the album. They allegedly have 9 more songs. If you think Taryll is the type to get mad because his song got rejected, you need to study his character a little more. Taryll had songs released with Michael when Eddie Cascio was a CHILD.

If Taryll believed the Cascio songs were real - he wouldn't DARE speak out against them. His uncle was his IDOL. You simply cannot compare the relationship of the third generation Jacksons to the second. Michael's peers, his siblings, and his elders have at times taken advantage of them, yes. But their argument is that they were there and part of his career from 1969 to 1984, and they believe that entitles them to act however the hell they choose. I'm not saying that's right. It clearly isn't.

But to even suggest that a third generation family member would even dare to try and take advantage is RIDICULOUS. This is largely a conservative family that respects their elders. Do you think Genevieve would dare to distort the facts about her uncle for her own gain? What about Siggy? Do you think Brandi would? Do you think Austin Brown would? The answer is obviously NO.

Look, it's like this. They say the apple never falls too far from the tree. Look at Tito. A kindhearted, gentle guy. Arguably the only brother who never attempted to capitalize or take advantage of Michael. Hell, he never even released a solo album or even tried to. Now go watch a 3T interview and two things should be VERY apparent to you. One is that they share that same personality. And the second is how much they adored and idolized their uncle.

And yet you want to claim that 3T might have malicious intents? That they might exploit their uncle for their own personal gain? PLEASE. These guys might be least malicious adults in the whole family.

There is ONE reason, and ONE reason alone why 3T are mad as hell about the Cascio songs. It's not because they feel slighted because their song didn't get picked. It's not because they have some sort of personal issue with the Cascio family. It's not because they are plotting to take over the Estate. You want to know what that one reason is, well here it is:

They love their uncle dearly, and they, who spent countless hours with their uncle for over 30 years, do NOT believe it is him singing these songs. And neither do I.


Plus it's no secret that Jackson's and the estate executors don't get along - even Randy said so on his twitter. Different Jacksons has been against different projects, Joe even has a bid to remove the executors claiming several things including fraud. So couldn't it be an action that continues in the previous line of actions/statements of "these executors of the estate are bad, they make questionable decisions, remove them and give the control to family for the protection of MJ's legacy"?

In short how can you, better yet how can we all be so sure of anyone's motives?

Irrelevant point. Both Taj and Jackie have a say in the Estate. They are the ONLY family members that do. If you read the album credits you'll see both of their names in the list of people that assist the Estate, and they are the only family members listed. Yet they've both spoken out saying they don't believe it's Michael on these songs. Them speaking out actually ENDANGERS their position within the Estate, it doesn't help it. What Joe or Randy think is not relevant to what Taj or Jackie think. Joe and Randy have nothing to lose. Taj does, and so does Jackie.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

YES WE SHOULD! Moderators, you have the power to try.

In fact, his address is somewhat well known. I think that Gaz or another moderator should contact Eddie to get a formal interview with audio evidence of MJ definitely being on the tracks. We can get the proof many of us needs!
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

I thought it was established that that verse was from the demo.

Here's another question that is interesting to answer : what about the new bridge for "For All Time"? Was it newly-recorded for Thriller 25? Then why is MJ so low in the mix, to the point where we can barely hear him? (In fact, is he even in the mix?)

No, that verse is not from demo. PYT remix is a combination of Michael's demo and will.i.am's productions. WBSS 2008 features a lot of Akon's vocal with Michael's in the background. The vocals were recorded circa 2007/2008. Listen to the remix again, the lyrics at the beginning of the song are different and that verse features Michael's mature voice.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Nobody has done it because it isn't possible. Melodyne doesn't change the tone of someone's voice or make them pronounce words differently. Furthermore, there's a limit to what you can do, and what I mean by that is that you can only do so much before the vocal is OBVIOUSLY overly processed and sounds completely unnatural. And by "unnatural" I don't mean sounding like a different person. I mean just stupid sounding, glitchy, shifting from note to note in a way that isn't even humanly possible, etc. It just sounds like garbage, like hitting random notes on a keyboard and expecting it to sound like a melody. These Cascio vocals are not "overly processed", because they are regular melodies that are possible for anyone to sing without much effort. They really haven't been processed much at all. There's a small amount of autotune, a small amount of Melodyne, and the rest is regular compression, reverb and EQ. That's it.





Is there any evidence to suggest that Taryll knows or has anything to do with the Cascio's? No. So, you're just pulling ideas out of thin air.

Regarding Cory and Taryll's song.... do you see them attacking Akon? Lenny Kravitz? Neff-U? The Cascio songs represent only 30% of the album. They allegedly have 9 more songs. If you think Taryll is the type to get mad because his song got rejected, you need to study his character a little more. Taryll had songs released with Michael when Eddie Cascio was a CHILD.

If Taryll believed the Cascio songs were real - he wouldn't DARE speak out against them. His uncle was his IDOL. You simply cannot compare the relationship of the third generation Jacksons to the second. Michael's peers, his siblings, and his elders have at times taken advantage of them, yes. But their argument is that they were there and part of his career from 1969 to 1984, and they believe that entitles them to act however the hell they choose. I'm not saying that's right. It clearly isn't.

But to even suggest that a third generation family member would even dare to try and take advantage is RIDICULOUS. This is largely a conservative family that respects their elders. Do you think Genevieve would dare to distort the facts about her uncle for her own gain? What about Siggy? Do you think Brandi would? Do you think Austin Brown would? The answer is obviously NO.

Look, it's like this. They say the apple never falls too far from the tree. Look at Tito. A kindhearted, gentle guy. Arguably the only brother who never attempted to capitalize or take advantage of Michael. Hell, he never even released a solo album or even tried to. Now go watch a 3T interview and two things should be VERY apparent to you. One is that they share that same personality. And the second is how much they adored and idolized their uncle.

And yet you want to claim that 3T might have malicious intents? That they might exploit their uncle for their own personal gain? PLEASE. These guys might be least malicious adults in the whole family.

There is ONE reason, and ONE reason alone why 3T are mad as hell about the Cascio songs. It's not because they feel slighted because their song didn't get picked. It's not because they have some sort of personal issue with the Cascio family. It's not because they are plotting to take over the Estate. You want to know what that one reason is, well here it is:

They love their uncle dearly, and they, who spent countless hours with their uncle for over 30 years, do NOT believe it is him singing these songs. And neither do I.




Irrelevant point. Both Taj and Jackie have a say in the Estate. They are the ONLY family members that do. If you read the album credits you'll see both of their names in the list of people that assist the Estate, and they are the only family members listed. Yet they've both spoken out saying they don't believe it's Michael on these songs. Them speaking out actually ENDANGERS their position within the Estate, it doesn't help it. What Joe or Randy think is not relevant to what Taj or Jackie think. Joe and Randy have nothing to lose. Taj does, and so does Jackie.


As much as I agree with your post, I must correct you here. Tito did try to take advantage of Michael's name to promote himself right after Michael's death.

He came up on a British TV and while the whole world was mourning Michael and while the journalist was asking Tito questions about Michael, Tito was promoting his concert in Britain, not once, but several times in few minutes.


EDIT:

Check it out here, it only lasts 4 minutes, yet he is promoting himself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDXYSXUoFVw
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

^Casey, thank you for your post.

I don't know the Jacksons well. I have never spent one second with 3T. One thing I do know is not to generalize and label people. Just becasue some of the siblings and Joe Jackson have questionable behavior doesn't mean Taryll is a greedy, angry and jealous person.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

And yet you want to claim that 3T might have malicious intents? That they might exploit their uncle for their own personal gain? PLEASE. These guys might be least malicious adults in the whole family.

There is ONE reason, and ONE reason alone why 3T are mad as hell about the Cascio songs. It's not because they feel slighted because their song didn't get picked. It's not because they have some sort of personal issue with the Cascio family. It's not because they are plotting to take over the Estate. You want to know what that one reason is, well here it is:

They love their uncle dearly, and they, who spent countless hours with their uncle for over 30 years, do NOT believe it is him singing these songs. And neither do I.

Ok, so the 3T guys are saints. But why do we assume that the Cascios, then, are immoral money-grubbers who have no problem feeding fake tracks to the unsuspecting public? As far as I know, the Cascios never took advantage of their close relationship with MJ while he was alive. They never betrayed him, and MJ himself loved them and trusted them deeply. So if it's impossible to imagine the 3T guys betraying their uncle now, why is it so easy to think the Cascios would, when they never did for 25 years?
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Ok, so the 3T guys are saints. But why do we assume that the Cascios, then, are immoral money-grubbers who have no problem feeding fake tracks to the unsuspecting public? As far as I know, the Cascios never took advantage of their close relationship with MJ while he was alive. They never betrayed him, and MJ himself loved them and trusted them deeply. So if it's impossible to imagine the 3T guys betraying their uncle now, why is it so easy to think the Cascios would, when they never did for 25 years?

The difference between believers and doubters is that it is the believers who vehemently defend the idea that the jacksons are out for money.

The doubters do not attack necessarily anyone as we don't know who's fault it is in this whole mess. We simply defend the idea that we don't hear Michael on those tracks.

Now, if the Cascio had fakes, they are not more to blame than those who allowed the tracks to be on the first Michael posthumous album.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

If you go back to the archives and read my initial posts you'll see that for Breaking News, I said I was torn. My initial feeling was parts being Michael and parts not being him (not necessarily an imposter but additional vocals). for KYHU and Monster I think majority of the lead vocals are Michael with legit backing vocals. (sorry I don't listen to the leaks so I cannot give an opinion on those leaked songs)

Plus I actually love Monster. KYHU isn't that special of a song and to me it looks like Breaking News was just added due to lyrics of it and could have been not included. So for the Cascio songs I like only one (monster) and could have lived without the other two.

I realize that with all that legal talk, it sounds like my opinion is solely based on my logic however this is not the case.

As I mentioned before I also worked as an assistant to a Pop-Rock band in my home country and I have experienced vocals in different settings. The lead singer of the band has a unique style / sounds that's a product of vocal training and breathing techniques.

I have seen him record a song 20 times in a studio and not being satisfied with his vocals, I also seen him in a home studio, sitting in a chair with a cigarette at hand singing in a "I don't care" mood sounding flat, skipping high notes, not doing his usual style. I have a happy birthday song he left on my voicemail that his voice cracks in the middle (and that none of my friends believe to be him as they only heard him with his "perfect" vocals).

In short I think "the stark differences" as you put it is quite possible and explainable. At no time I claimed "oh Michael is putting his heart and soul to this songs", no he's not. but they can simply be songs he recorded at a home studio when he was bored (scenario of course) and didn't really show the effort.

As for my opinion goes - I might be wrong , I might be right - I don't know, nobody knows for that matter.

Is this a satisfactory answer?

Ivy, thank you so much for your response. Again, it's not my intention to challege you, so the question at the end is somewhat unnecessary.

Just like what you mentioned in your post, you were kind enough to provide us a lot of helpful legal information. I didn't see you posting your own thought that much, so I'm just curious as to what you think about the songs. That's all... :better:
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

@ Ivy,

if you don't listen to the leaks, I respect that. But for the sake of the debate and the fight for the truth to come out, please, I am begging you listen to STAY. Then come back and tell what you feel.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

This is insanity. What has Eddie even been up to since the Oprah interview? Why hasn't he been giving more interviews? You think there'd be a demand for it.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Bumper - thanks for that, although I should have been more clear. I meant that Tito had never directly used Michael for his own gains while he was alive. Since Michael's death it is harder to read people's intentions. It's very possible media people lured Tito in for an interview promising him that he would be given the opportunity to promote his own project, but their real intention was to make the interviews as much about Michael as they possibly could.

kreen - 3T don't have anything to prove. They aren't the ones selling questionable vocals for millions of dollars with no evidence. That's why.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Bumper - thanks for that, although I should have been more clear. I meant that Tito had never directly used Michael for his own gains while he was alive. Since Michael's death it is harder to read people's intentions. It's very possible media people lured Tito in for an interview promising him that he would be given the opportunity to promote his own project, but their real intention was to make the interviews as much about Michael as they possibly could.

kreen - 3T don't have anything to prove. They aren't the ones selling questionable vocals for millions of dollars with no evidence. That's why.


And by the way, HOLLYWOOD TONIGHT is excellent. I even didn't know they were involved in the song untill the debate started about the controversy.

So, if other songs are as excellent as HOLLYWOOD TONIGHT, so yes we want them instead of the Cascio's doubtful half-baked experiments.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

The difference between believers and doubters is that it is the believers who vehemently defend the idea that the jacksons are out for money.

The doubters do not attack necessarily anyone as we don't know who's fault it is in this whole mess. We simply defend the idea that we don't hear Michael on those tracks.

Now, if the Cascio had fakes, they are not more to blame than those who allowed the tracks to be on the first Michael posthumous album.

Exactly. :agree:

We simply defend the idea that we don't hear Michael on those tracks. Most importantly, we want to know what truly happened. Our focus is not on who's at fault, what's the consequences, but on what happened to the music.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

I spent last night listening to various demos that MJ has done, portions of unreleased tracks, and the extras on TII. It just made it all the more blazingly obvious that the person singing on the Cascio tracks is not MJ :(
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Many believers claim that doubters speculate about the theories, calling us conspiracy theorists.

They are right. We cannot but speculate.

But if there is one thing that we certainly do not speculate, it is the fact that we do not hear Michael. We want to know why.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

@ Ivy,

if you don't listen to the leaks, I respect that. But for the sake of the debate and the fight for the truth to come out, please, I am begging you listen to STAY. Then come back and tell what you feel.

For the sake of this ongoing debate, I also urge you to listen to Stay if you haven't done so. I wonder whether there is anybody here who changed his/her mind after listening to Stay.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Stay took away a lot of my doubt. I hear Michael all over the song, and I think it's beautiful.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Stay took away a lot of my doubt. I hear Michael all over the song, and I think it's beautiful.

With all due respect to what you hear, the equation for doubters seems impossible. One cannot claim to hear Michael both on all other Michael's songs and on the Cascio tracks, STAY being the least plausible track.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Stay seems the most like Michael, to me. Also, that comparison video with Tell It Like It Is is really bad, in my opinion.

People said this same crap about Invincible, that it was cheesy and ballads and not his typical style. But I feel Michael on all these songs, and I can hear the different time periods and his voice is definitely different in Another Day versus Behind The Mask.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Different people do hear things very differently. May be this is the reason why this debate is so heated and longlasting.

For me, Stay is the worst attempt to imitate Michael's vocals. I don't hear Michael. If I haven't heard the song before and have no knowledge about it, I would never know this is a "Michael Jackson song".

Interesting... :scratch:
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

It's this that makes debates so... Well, fun. Everyone perceives things differently, and it can be enlightening to hear other people's opinions and why they think that.

As for me (as if you all probably didn't know by this point) I believe the Cascio tracks are MJ because it does seem plausible that a lot of processing went into the vocals, and with my tinkering with Virtual DJ, you can make anyone sound completely different in terms of pitch and other effects. Plus, I believe that he wasn't in a professional setting, and he wasn't planning on an album at the Cascio home. The way I see it, it was just casual recording to aid himself in the proper recording of them, whenever that would be. That being said, I haven't heard "Stay". Does anyone know where I can find it?
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

I believe the Cascio tracks are MJ because it does seem plausible that a lot of processing went into the vocals, and with my tinkering with Virtual DJ, you can make anyone sound completely different in terms of pitch and other effects.

I can't quite believe you've said that. You believe the Cascio songs are MJ because the processing has made his voice 'sound completely different'? ie. It's definitely MJ because it sounds completely different?

Do you not see the giant hole in that theory?
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

I can't quite believe you've said that. You believe the Cascio songs are MJ because the processing has made his voice 'sound completely different'? ie. It's definitely MJ because it sounds completely different?

Do you not see the giant hole in that theory?

I did not say that processing made his voice sound "completely different". Auto-tune can make someone sound astoundingly different, depending on the vocal track in question. My reason as to why he sounds, in my opinion, slightly off than normal is because it was nothing more than a casual session, nothing professional or serious. It wasn't work to him, it was just having fun recording whatever came into their heads.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

It's this that makes debates so... Well, fun. Everyone perceives things differently, and it can be enlightening to hear other people's opinions and why they think that.

As for me (as if you all probably didn't know by this point) I believe the Cascio tracks are MJ because it does seem plausible that a lot of processing went into the vocals, and with my tinkering with Virtual DJ, you can make anyone sound completely different in terms of pitch and other effects. Plus, I believe that he wasn't in a professional setting, and he wasn't planning on an album at the Cascio home. The way I see it, it was just casual recording to aid himself in the proper recording of them, whenever that would be. That being said, I haven't heard "Stay". Does anyone know where I can find it?

First, explain how come that Michael on the phone in the beginning of the song I LIKE THE WAY YOU LOVE ME sounds Michael despite the poor phone sound quality compared to a whole studio?

Second, try 2000 watts section for STAY
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

First, the only thing that pops into my mind was that MJ was still actively recording and his voice was in a constant warmed-up zone, if you will. That was 2004, and maybe sooner as we don't know when that phone conversation and the actual recording of "The Way You Love Me" took place.

Second, thank you, I'll look there :)
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

I did not say that processing made his voice sound "completely different". Auto-tune can make someone sound astoundingly different, depending on the vocal track in question. My reason as to why he sounds, in my opinion, slightly off than normal is because it was nothing more than a casual session, nothing professional or serious. It wasn't work to him, it was just having fun recording whatever came into their heads.


You expect from professionals to sell us funny Michael Jackson rather than someone who could replace him and milk us for the rest of our lives?
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

If that was their plan, with us knowing that the Estate has only a small number of album-worthy songs left, after the 4th or so album, people are going to catch on that these seemingly few of songs are in fact endless. If it was an impersonator, they would only be able to milk it for so long before they're in serious legal trouble. If anything, they're using as much album-worthy material as possible, regardless if he was being professional/serious or not.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

^Like I said last night, the Cascio session was not the first time Michael entered a studio after the trial. He worked in Ireland with will.i.am in 2006.

I'd also like to point out the 1994 Dangerous Court Deposition. Michael sang Billie Jean and Dangerous. It's fair for me to assume that he didn't sing full out or try hard. It's not like he had to impress the judge and the lawyers. He sounded unmistakenly Michael Jackson. He didn't sang in a professional surrounding. It's just a live recording in a court room.

So, his voice was not warm up or poor equipment is not valid explanation.
 
Back
Top