Complete and utter nonsense. In fact this is all a provable lie.
So the film in the cameras wasn't film intended for the cinema? Is that what you're claiming? Right... here you are:
"Thriller’s 14-minute dance extravaganza, featuring Jackson metamorphosing into a ghoul, was shot by Paynter on 35mm film."
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk...s-thriller-video-dies-aged-82-92534-27542006/
Got it? 35mm film. You know what that is don't you? Not only is it the death of your argument it's also proof, just in case anyone was being fooled by your nonsense, that the 'Thriller' film was INDEED a FILM!
What do we know about 35mm film? "The ubiquity of 35 mm movie projectors in commercial movie theaters makes it the only motion picture format, film or video, that can be played in almost any cinema in the world."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/35_mm_film
So... AS I SAID... Michael Jackson's 'Vision' was for his 'short films' to be just that... 'FILMS'! And the fact that you've come on here and tried to claim that he was wrong and that 'Thriller' was shot for TV is absolutely disgraceful.
What are you going to say about the 35mm issue? Like I said... I await your apology...