Latest on MJJC

Michael Jackson v. Wade Robson, a new trial to be held

Blues_Away2023 said:
If I recall, did he not say that MJ wanted nothing further to do with him sexually once he became a man?

He said something along the lines that he had been replaced by younger boys which would give him full reign to do whatever?

He was a good looking guy and in his early 20s I doubt he could refrain from getting on with other hot girls
Click to expand...
And what younger boys would that be?

Jordan is older than him and so is Brett and Mac. Brett and Mac never claimed to be victims anyway.

Wade and the guilters entire narrative is built off of imaginary boys who don't even exist.

And the claim that Michael replaced boys is an outrageous lie that is pushed by wolves in sheeps clothing like taraborelli.

None of the kids Michael was friends with were ever replaced including Wade!!!

They were all friends with him until the day he died. Brett said the last time he saw Michael in person was when Michael was in Bahrain and Brett was well into adulthood. And he said the last time he spoke to Michael on the phone was a week or 2 before he died. The friendship never ended.

I'm so sick of guilters pushing this false narrative. And it doesn't even make sense if people actually do the research instead of blindly believing it.
 
Last edited:
kelley said:
And what younger boys would that be?

Jordan is older than him and so is Brett and Mac. Brett never claimed to be victim anyway.

Wade and the guilters entire narrative is built off of imaginary boys who don't even exist.

And the claim that Michael replaced boys is an outrageous lie that is pushed by wolves in sheeps clothing like taraborelli.

None of the kids Michael was friends with were ever replaced including Wade!!!

They were all friends with him until the day he died. Brett said the last time he saw Michael in person was when Michael was in Bahrain and Brett was well into adulthood. And he said the last time he spoke to Michael on the phone was a week or 2 before he died. The friendship never ended.

I'm so sick of guilters pushing this false narrative. And it doesn't even make sense if people actually do the research instead of blindly believing it.
Click to expand...
I have no idea Kelley, it wasn't me who said it, it was good ole Wade Robson.

Good luck in your guilters and non believers hunt 👍
 
kelley said:
What is this suppose to mean?

I'm not hunting anybody, I just think people on this site should be more vigilant because there are a lot of suspects accounts on here that are obvious infiltrators.
Click to expand...
I think you're going a bit OTT in a Hercule Poirot style detective seeking for infiltrators.

Pretty much all your comments have included a section where you mentioned that people need to be vigilant for guilters etc.

It's not like it's 2019 again, it's fairly calm just now other than a few crazy fans.
 
can someone please point out Wade's contradictions when it comes to the "repressed memory" thing?

i dont even know the exact meaning behind those legal terms but i think wade specifically said it was "not" repressed memory. why did he find it important to emphasise and what contradicts it?
 
Glanni said:
can someone please point out Wade's contradictions when it comes to the "repressed memory" thing?

i dont even know the exact meaning behind those legal terms but i think wade specifically said it was "not" repressed memory. why did he find it important to emphasise and what contradicts it?
Click to expand...
Lawyer coaching
 
KOPV said:
***Case Update #2: The Supreme came back with their decision and it's denied. We ARE going to trial...

Please don't let this pull discourage you, we WILL win this fight!!
Click to expand...
ok, so it's happening. For some reason I have some hope that this might put an end to all the BS. But you never know, it's a civil case with low burden of poof and it's up to what the jury/judge believe (and the appeals show us it can go both ways). Let's hope for the best!
 
We did it. 1993. 2003. now 2023 . and god willing i can do it 2053 cause.. they will always do it. So we have to :(
stick through it again, ..nd again .. again. MJ supporters are resilient,
 
librariangirl:) said:
ok, so it's happening. For some reason I have some hope that this might put an end to all the BS. But you never know, it's a civil case with low burden of poof and it's up to what the jury/judge believe (and the appeals show us it can go both ways). Let's hope for the best!
Click to expand...
Civil Cases are terrible just off the way we have to wait so long to even get to a meaningful point. But maybe these things deserve as much publicity as possible.
 
Mister_Jay_Tee said:
The Jonathan Majors case has taken so long to come to a head. An MJ case in 93 would've been just as excruciating. Hence why the settlement came to be. An unfortunate shortcut that did cause many problems but, a shortcut nonetheless.
Click to expand...
You mean the estate should settle? I would hate that.
 
bluemoon7 said:
What kind of fuckery is this? What dumb judicial system lets a living person sue a DEAD person??? It's insane!
Click to expand...
They're technically suing his Estate as a loophole to suing him directly. But yeah... this is not great.
librariangirl:) said:
You mean the estate should settle? I would hate that.
Click to expand...
I won't lie, there is a very small part of me that wants them to just so we don't have to endure a trial... but that would likely make things worse.

I don't think this news has settled in fully yet... but I'm nervous now about what could happen.
 
Amaya said:
They're technically suing his Estate as a loophole to suing him directly. But yeah... this is not great.

I won't lie, there is a very small part of me that wants them to just so we don't have to endure a trial... but that would likely make things worse.

I don't think this news has settled in fully yet... but I'm nervous now about what could happen.
Click to expand...
This is such a crazy thing to say.

You do realize that that will only encourage more liars to jump on the bandwagon and make false accusations.

The arvizos hunted Michael down and planned to copy the chandlers before they ever met Michael.

Wade and James are only making these accusations because they want a settlement like Jordan.

Settling with them will never end this nightmare it would make it worse.

They need to fight and I think they should even consider sponsoring some counter lawsuits against these liars. Brett Barnes may be willing to sue if the estate helps him with legal counsel. Also people like Norma staikos and other former employees of Michael who have been viciously slandered the past 30 years, The estate should contact all of the offer them legal council to sue for slander and defamation.
 
kelley said:
This is such a crazy thing to say.

You do realize that that will only encourage more liars to jump on the bandwagon and make false accusations.

The arvizos hunted Michael down and planned to copy the chandlers before they ever met Michael.

Wade and James are only making these accusations because they want a settlement like Jordan.

Settling with them will never end this nightmare it would make it worse.

They need to fight and I think they should even consider sponsoring some counter lawsuits against these liars. Brett Barnes may be willing to sue if the estate helps him with legal counsel. Also people like Norma staikos and other former employees of Michael who have been viciously slandered the past 30 years, The estate should contact all of the offer them legal council to sue for slander and defamation.
Click to expand...
Oh I do realize that... hence why I said it would likely make things worse. Granted, there's a part of me that wants to believe that wouldn't happen if they settled, but the way the world has been recently, who the hell knows anymore.

But yes, it would be better to fight... and definitely get as many people that are still alive and healthy enough to testify to do this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top