Personally I don't think we should give one flying fck what that Wooton thinks of MJ.
Perhaps that's called anxiety/confusion.Nothing wrong with any of those,if you ask me.
Thank you for this. Emotional intelligence seems to be a rarity these days,I suppose..
with tom mesaerau in this i reckon we will win
What did I say was wrong? That there's been nothing but doom and gloom, were not talking worry or uncertainty, were talking straight up cynicism. Of course I care about MJs reputation, but I'm already used to a more tepid/lukewarm appraisal of him, so I have learned not to wear his victories/failures on my sleeve anyway.
It's not over after this unfortunately. This is just returning to the new status quo. Until they actively get Dan Reed's documentary entirely discredited, that smear piece remains.
I'm guessing that enough writers and commentators in the MSM must stand up and say something about the documentary that hasn't been said already. But either they're too lazy to do so, too convinced in the film to do anything or too scared to ask questions. I doubt anyone within the mainstream media-sphere would do that any time soon. I hope I'm wrong though.
Maybe Dan Wooton will decide to go big on MJ. A two edged sword really.
You reckon he will?
That wouldn't be a two-edged sword, that would be a disaster. The man is now embroiled in another scandal re comments being made, live, on-air, by Lawrence Fox and which DW laughed at, did not call out or condemn and which resulted in him being sacked from at least one of his media jobs. He was in deep sh*t already and now this.
He's definitely doing this just to try and get some people on his side. I don't understand why some people seem to change their opinions on people or act like their opinions are valid/should be considered when they say something they like, disregarding all other facts and knowledge about said person. Very strange.
Y'all keep him.
You may raise a somewhat fair point,though.
Nonetheless though,so what? What is really wrong with the concept of cynicism and the people that adopt it?
But people are not the same. Never have been and never will be.
).Nothing is wrong persay, but I just don't like it. It strikes me as elitist even though it's also not productive. It's the same as optimism really, just based off the way things are, not the way they're supposed to be.
I see..
Some people on the forum are outright trolls though, so the water is being muddied regardless. It exacerbates things.
You're indeed right(saying this as someone who could possibly be viewed as one as well,or as one that has at least been something of a troll once
),but you're more than right here.The latest is that the Estate filed the petition for the CA supreme courts review. The key issues in the petition are:
Oh yeah, I heard about this a couple of weeks back.
Come to think of it, at least one writer from the media did have questions about LN and how the media handled it. Stereo Williams wrote about it in Medium around the time LN was being distributed. You can read it here: https://medium.com/@stereowilliams/correct-me-if-im-wrong-6336108a25db
I only know about that from this 2nd hand account of a TMZ report. I assume it's correct.
i thought he was pro - michael ?
I saw a video segment where Corey says that people came to him and his mother asking for negative information about Michael. And Corey says that Michael didn't do anything wrong. But there are others who did harass him and he can name names. But those people were only interested in blaming Michael, and they don't want other guilty people.