kelley
Proud Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2023
- Messages
- 273
- Points
- 93
I think people put too much stock on taboreelli's book. He clearly has his own agenda and he clearly projects his own assumptions about Michael into his book. It is not neutral or impartial.Maybe traumatized was the wrong word, affected is more definitely true. The way it's described (By Taborrelli, but still), it sounds like it bothered Michael. Being propositioned by women specifically, that's what I say traumatized him. And, it did play on him, these stories of women and love making.. You can literally hear that subtext in his work. Even up to the point of Dangerous and stuff like Superfly Sister, MJ always was enamoured by the femme fatale and the concept of, lust over romance. He seemed to have a lot to say about it. If you look at his art piece by piece you can read a lot into it if you want to. It's the closest thing to an autobiography by him we have.
Like always, these things happen later. For some reason people never talk about cause and effect. MJ got more lax, and was more lax, that would be called "loosening up". Or else maybe desensitizing. We literally know what the mans favorite girly magazines were even. I didn't say he was asexual for crying out loud. We're talking about 10 years old being around people having sex and if that's what you think is ok or normal for society. It's a loaded topic, though, I guess.
He admitted that he found several women who claimed to have had a relationship with Michael but he dismissed them all and did not include them in the book.
And yet he included every other tabloid he rumor no matter how ridiculous. He also used Victor Gutierrez's book as a source during the parts about the chandlers. A book that even Jordan Chandler admitted was filled with lies.
It's also worth mentioning that Taborrelli is a gay male so he likely filters everything he hears and sees about Michael through that lens.
As a result his book at best, pushes the agenda that Michael was asexual, afraid of women and sex (a completely absurd stance to take) and only had sex with Lisa Marie his entire life, or at worst slyly pushes a more sinister narrative that gives guilters the amo they need to demonize Michael.
I don't know why Fans continue to promote this book as if its the end all to be all. Other than the original 1991 version which is well sourced and researched. The current and most recent versions of his book are worthless and filled with lies.
Taborelli lied about his connections to Michael for starters. He has never provided any proof that he knew Michael beyond that one picture he has of them from the late 70s. I don't believe he knew Michael personally at all. He used a classic tactic that these charlatans pull, they take a pic with a Jackson and then use the pic as "proof" they are close to Michael or the family and then use that position to spread lies and exploit the fans.
JRT writes elaborate scenes in his book that are complete with full dialogs of supposed conversations that he himself was not present for, so where is he getting it from??
Only explanation is that he's making it up and it's pure fiction.
Last edited: