Finally found the analysis performed by 'Joy' on a French MJ forum. Thought some "ACTUAL" analysis might make a few folks at least reconsder their stance. You still there Smooth? The following is the translation:
comparative analysis of "Keep Your Head Up" and "Break of Dawn" by a scientific expert in signal processing and conclusions .
.by Taaj Malik on Tuesday, November 16, 2010 at 10:45pm.Brigitte Huguet November 14 at 1:25pm
IMPORTANT : comparative analysis of "Keep Your Head Up" and "Break of Dawn" by a scientific expert in signal processing and conclusions .
Good evening again everyone,This comparative analysis and its conclusions are published by 'JOY', a Michael's fan, on the MJFrance.com's website (French fans club), here below the translation :
'I entrusted the comparative analysis of ‘Keep Your Head Up’ and ‘Break of Dawn’ to a scientific expert in signal processing, its conclusions are follows: - Regarding ‘Keep your head up’, the cutoff frequency is (Very strange) to 11 khz while much of the energy Michael Jackson's voice was at frequencies between 12 and 14 Khz. - The characteristic spectral lines of Jackson's voice doesn’t found in ‘Keep your head up’. - This recording (‘keep your head up’) has the meaning of frequency term a rectangular form which suggests the possible use speech synthesizers. - We can not find anywhere rays at 7.5 khz, or lines at 5 khz, or lines at 12.5 khz or at 13.1 khz lines... characteristics of the true voice of Jackson. - Conversely, the frequencies appear at 4.1 kHz, at 8.5 kHz, at 10.2 kHz, at 12.2 kHz (even if it was very artificially vert attenuated) that the real Michael Jackson did not use.
This analysis was done using the method of 'FFT' (Hamming’s method, at 65.5 khz).
The conclusions are that 80% of risks that it isn’t Michael Jackson who sings on ‘Keep your head up’, and the idea suggestiving vocal synthesis, in addition to an imitator in the choruses, is quite plausible.'
French text at the link here below :
http://www.mjfranceforum.com/index.php?topic=21331.msg609576#msg609576
For those who are not fully informed, 'Keep your head up' is in the tracklist of the posthum album. The track has been circulating on the net this weekend but was quickly removed. You can still listen tonight at this link :
http://www.wat.tv/video/michael-jackson-keep-your-36q6d_35pjv_.htmland it should be tomorrow on the official website of Michael Jackson (ie Sony !!!!!).
Please, sign the petition (your signature will not in contradiction with the fact to boycott Sony. Your signature will be for a total respect of the artist, Michael Jackson, and his work. These are two parallel actions but differents) and share as widely as possible around the world. This petition is very important :
http://www.petitions24.com/michael
- Frequency differences are irrefutable. And that is admissible in court.In fact, everything depends on the nature of the complaint if the complaint is that it is not that Michael sings at 100%, it will be wrong because there are ad-libs, the 'aouhh' ... and they may have put a small percentage of Michael in it. This analysis provides objective factors contributed to the understanding, but no definitive answer to 100%.We should deepen the tests by others. We need more experts discuss on several tracks (songs).
2/ There is nothing more credible than mathematical analysis. What it shows? It's as if Donald was singing the Barry White ... The voice in 'Keep your hand up' does not contain the same frequencies as the voice of Michael in 'Break of Dawn'. This is not the same voice, at 80%. It is likely that there are several voices on the track, and the idea of a vocal synthesis in addition explain the curve non-human.In all cases there is a fraud, imposture, fake.
Thanking you for your listening,
Peace and L.O.V.E.Brigitte
