Kingofpop4ever3000
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,533
- Points
- 0
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate
I think that Wade is counting on the judge already believing that Michael was guilty. And I think that judges made personally motivated decisions in Michael's court cases while Michael was still alive. I believe the 1993 case and the 2003 case were great examples of that. Judge Pastor was the only judge who displayed a good amount of sense, in my opinion. But I still have a very negative opinion of judges when it comes to Michael. I will take back my opinion if the judge or judges in Wade's cases throw them out. But I will believe it when I see it. I think that Wade is taking advantage of the overall public perception that Michael was guilty. All he has to do is claim to have been abused and talk trash along with McManus and Francia for added shock value to the judge and a possible jury to get them upset and that's it. And he could be lying about everything and still get away with it. This is ridiculous and disgusting.
I think that Wade is counting on the judge already believing that Michael was guilty. And I think that judges made personally motivated decisions in Michael's court cases while Michael was still alive. I believe the 1993 case and the 2003 case were great examples of that. Judge Pastor was the only judge who displayed a good amount of sense, in my opinion. But I still have a very negative opinion of judges when it comes to Michael. I will take back my opinion if the judge or judges in Wade's cases throw them out. But I will believe it when I see it. I think that Wade is taking advantage of the overall public perception that Michael was guilty. All he has to do is claim to have been abused and talk trash along with McManus and Francia for added shock value to the judge and a possible jury to get them upset and that's it. And he could be lying about everything and still get away with it. This is ridiculous and disgusting.
Last edited: