Clearly this someone hasn't read the court testimony very carefully as it's just wrong. Wade had plenty of contact, on his own with mj in his bedroom at both neverland and his westwood apartment and hotels in 1990 when he was 7. It's all in the court transcripts. I imagine wade isn't claiming abuse 24/7 from 1990-1996. I guess he'll be alleging the first abuse started in 1990 and thelast incident of abuse was in 96/97 when he was about 14 i think he said. There's no point using false arguments to prop up mj's case.
That's true
but was he ever really around MJ alone between 94-96 ( or 97 ) to even make that claim ?
Michael was back and forth with Lisa at her home and at the ranch , didn't Sneedon try to get an extension on the statue of limitations for that reason ?
Where there's smoke there's fire--OR--Where there's smoke, there's a lot of SMOKERS!
Weird I haven't heard anything here in Mexico but it's better though, my family haters won't be mocking on Michael, bashing him or picking one me.
Lol ! I meant Chandler sued Michael, LMP, and the whole planet, sorry
I shared the inconsistency issues with them as well, including Knew all the time, testimony in 05, him not "understanding" when the prosecutor gave him that explicit direct examination, etc.
I wonder how Rebbie Jack$on ,who is a good friend of Stacy Brown, is feeling right now....Must be fun between the Jack$on$ right now lol
I was in someone's home today & was told this story was all over the news. I thought you guys said it was not being covered much. I was told it was on channel 7, 4, TMZ, I think they said 5 too. Maybe some of the New York local channels covered this & we did not notice. Anyway, the family did not believe Wade only because he waited after Michael died & was in music videos. I shared the inconsistency issues with them as well, including Knew all the time, testimony in 05, him not "understanding" when the prosecutor gave him that explicit direct examination, etc.
Whoisit the people in the family who give Stacey information are at fault too. If the stories are not true, then the particular family member simple has to have their lawyer send Stacey a letter. However, since he keeps doing this, we know the family is doing nothing. Look at how Taj said nothing forceful to Stacey. Stacy is allowed to continue his false & hateful claims against Michael, because the family allows it. The same family that asked AEG for a settlement.
^^8701 They simply nodded their heads, because these people do not get details the way we do. Nor do they look at what people say or what the media say in a critical manner. I already knew that what they mentioned to me about Wade waiting till Michael died, etc., was what they already heard the reporters on the tv say. They are typical of those who basically listen to what the media say and simple repeat it to another person.
These people are my clients & the first time I met the grandmother she told me she believed that Michael was a P and her first "evidence" was the comment about sharing a bed. She was all outraged by that comment & sat down to tackle me about Michael. She mentioned that her niece gets upset when she tries to talk about the molestation & they argue. Of course I was the opposite and let her make her big noise. I did not get upset & did not argue, which was what she wanted so she could feed off that. I calmly told her I would bring her some documents from court. I can tell you now that she does not believe Michael was a molester.
^^Well if you think the way Taj handled him was very effective then OK.
Says the guy with a girls name :S
We had evidence to that none other than Katherine Jackson tampered with the jury
What utter crap! When Diane Dimond went on her whoring that stupid book promotion tour from interview to interview, Dan Abrams (from the show that use to be on MSNBC called the Abrams Report) had Diane Dimond on and he told her he and his producer felt it was obvious after reading her book it betrays MJ as a Pedophile, even when she doesn't flat out say it. She actaully sat there shaking her head saying no it wasn't true! lolIn the book I wrote for Bob Jones and in Diane Dimond book, he is not called a pedophile. Both books try and present a balanced look at him and allow the reader to decide whatever they wish.
I want Rebbie to call him out on this
bluetopez;3827407 said:Home girl was afraid of a defamation lawsuit IMO and has been since the first one MJ had against her, that is the real reason why she will never say what she really wanna say but goes out of her way to present it in a way that makes you know what she really is trying to say. Her games are hard to miss and so is Stacey's! -_-
MR. CHANDLER: Let me put it to you this way: I have a set routine of words that I'm going to go in there that have been rehearsed and I'm going to say.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Yeah.
MR. CHANDLER: Okay? Because I don't want to say anything that could be used against me.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Yeah.
MR. CHANDLER: So I know exactly what I can say. That's why I'm bringing the tape recorder.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Yeah.
MR. CHANDLER: I have some things on paper to show a few people --
MR. SCHWARTZ: Yeah.
MR. CHANDLER: -- and that's it. My whole part is going to take two or three minutes, and I'm going to turn around [tape irregularity], and that's it. There's not going to be anything said, other than what I've been told to say -
MR. SCHWARTZ: Yeah.
MR. CHANDLER: -- and I'm going to turn around and leave, and they're going to have a decision to make.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Yeah.
MR. CHANDLER: And based on that decision, I'll decide whether or not we're going to talk again or whether it's going to go further.
“In an interview for Vanity Fair six months after the Westwood Marquis meeting, Pellicano drew attention to the fact that Evan hugged Michael at the start of the meeting."If I believed somebody molested my kid and I got that close to him, I'd be on death row right now." Supposedly this means that because Evan didn't kill Michael right then and there, he really didn't believe the molestation occurred.
Pellicano, of course, would have us believe Evan had already accused Michael of molesting Jordie as part of an extortion attempt, so when Evan hugged him it showed he knew Michael had done no such thing.
But if Evan went there to extort Michael, why would he start off by giving him a big hug? Why would he act friendly? Wouldn't he at least pretend that he believed Michael had molested Jordie and that he was angry? Especially with Michael's audio expert/private investigator present as a witness!
That Evan walked into the meeting and gave Michael a big hug only corroborates that Evan went there with the belief that Michael genuinely cared for Jordie and hadn't done anything intentional to hurt him. After all, the idea that Michael was being accused of intentionally harming the boy — that a "molestation" had occurred — did not originate in Evan's mind. It was Anthony Pellicano and Bert Fields who first used the term."
“Evan then walked over to Michael and embraced the star with a big, happy-to-see-you hug, patting him on the back like an old friend.”
"But Barry was not intimidated. He informed Pellicano that Evan had made no public statements of defamatory remarks about Michael in any way. And further, that Evan, as a dentist, was a mandatory reporter governed by the same requirements as any licensed health professional. Not only was he required to report his suspicions to the proper authorities, but he could not be sued for doing so even if they turned out to be incorrect."