dannyboy72;4118611 said:
Didnt Wade say in his testimony that he slept in bed with MJ numerous times? I think this is why people believe his story. They feel that something must have happened all those nighs they were alone together.
Except
1. the things Robson claims have nothing to do with sleeping!
2. Bunch of other girls and boys slept in the same room with MJ and they were not molested. Why should anyone believe it was different for Robson or anyone else?
The Cascio kids spent many many more nights with MJ and none of them were harmed in any way.
" The bottom line: Michael’s interest in young boys had absolutely nothing to do with sex. I say this with the unassailable confidence of firsthand experience, the confidence of a
young boy who slept in the same room as Michael hundreds of times, and with the absolute conviction of a man who saw Michael interact with thousands of kids. In all the years that I was close to him, I saw nothing that raised any red flags, not as a child and not as an adult. Michael may have been eccentric, but that didn’t make him criminal. "
Frank Cascio My Friend Michael
http://jetzi-mjvideo.com/books-jetzi-02/11mfm/11mfm20.html
3. Robson very rarely was alone with MJ during those 7 years. Random sleepovers while the parents are around and can walk in any time are NOT pedophile modus operandi.
4. His sister slept in MJ's bed too and Robson claims that molestation occurred when she was there right in the same bed. How does that make sense especially when he also argues that MJ wanted to keep everyone out with locks and alarm and even Do not disturb sign -- which noone ever mentioned before, by the way.
5. Robson not only contradicts what he said in 2005 but also what his sister and mother said under oath. Since he does not say that they lied if they told the truth then Robson is lying now.
For example, Chantal testified that she slept upstairs the first night an in Mj's bed the second night.
But Robson now says that Chantal slept in the bed the first night and she slept upstairs the second night and that's when the first molestation happened and that's when MJ told him that he should not talk about it to anyone.
Chantal explained that the first night she slept upstairs because she didn't want to invade Mj's private place. She also told his brother to go up but he refused.
And the second night she slept in Mj's bed because she said she felt more comfortable with Mj's friendship.
But now Robson says that Chantal left the second night because she felt uncomfortable sleeping in Mj's bed with him -- which is a bunch of bull.
To make it even more ridiculous, Robson wants us to believe that now he remembers every details of what happened when he was 7 years old but in 2005
he didn't even get the year right when they first visited the ranch. He said it was 1989 in reality it was 1990.
6. Robson was asked about the whole sleeping in bed thing in details. Whether they slept next to each other (no), whether they cuddled (no).
The whole thing was the same thing Brett Barnes described on TV: he slept on one side I slept on the other and that was it. And Robson slept there because he wanted to not because MJ invited him in his bed.
It was always the kids who asked him and his parents first. Both Joy robson, Wade Robson and Chantal Robson testified about that.
That fact doesn't compute with the whole narrative that MJ lured him in his bed to molest him.
7. Why in the world would MJ be interested in SLEEPING if he wanted to rape Robson?
Wouldn't it make more sense for an actual predator to let the kid go after the molestation? Why would he make himself look more suspicious by sleeping through the night with a kid?
I bet that most actual molesters do not do that at all.
Reading the Sandusky testimonies it was clear that he was not interested in sleepovers. He just sent the kid to the basement room and molested him and then left.
And he most certainly didn't have their parents around.