Did anyone compare Safechuck's lawsuit (the actual document) to the story found on the hater website which was available before he filed his civil suit?
I don't have the stomach to read his lawsuit I read the hater version and that was enough
I'd like to know whether they are identical or there are elements like the flashlight or the Sheryl Crow parts which are missing from his lawsuit.
Safechuck's story sounds exactly something Gutierrez and the haters or Dimond would come up with, it has the same old
elements: MJ disliking women, dumping boys, being jeolous of girls whom the boys like even the focus on his nose, the medallion (which Sneddon never asked Robson about so it's BS)
all of that shit is in Gutierrez's book and it's sure not a coincidence.
If this BS goes to trial Gutierrez MUST be an issue.
Remember this?
Dimond: “And, I have to tell you, if my source is correct, who has seen this tape, and again, he always has been.
The acts that are being performed on that tape are exactly what the accuser a year ago said Michael Jackson did to him.”
So a completely fabricated molestation is "exactly what Chandler said MJ did to him"?
And we still should believe Gutierrez had no role in creating Chandler's story?
Where did Jordan Chandler get these ideas?
"According to his pattern, I believe he would have left me and, sort of dumped me, I guess
you could call it. And I would be, sort of, a vegetable."
"Why a vegetable?"
"Because he would continue to do those things and I would have no knowing of what else is
out there."
"Say that again. You wouldn't know what else is out there?"
"Right. Like, he didn't like it if I would want to call a girl or something. You know, I
wouldn't know, like, there were other options."
"Are you saying that he would pull you off the track of going out with girls."
Dumped me? Who was dumped? Who was left? The exact opposite was true!
Frank Eddie remained close to MJ for the rest of his life.
Safechuck went to Budapest with MJ and still went to Neverland at age 18 and still talked to MJ once a year.
Brett and Wade and Mac remained Mj's friend to the very end, visiting Neverland, talking on the phone, testifying for him
Mac becoming the kids's godfather.
Spence got married in Neverland.
He got this nonsense from Gutierrez no doubt. No way Jordan Chandler himself noticed this "pattern" which didn't even exist and concluded on his own especially since he was in Neverland with all those boys! Wade was there, Mac was there, the Cascios were there he could see that none of them was dumped.
But guess where I first heard this revolving door crap? From Diane Dimond, whom Gutierrez thanks in his book and who called Gutierrez his "best source". They were joined at the hip. And the Chandlers never denied that talked to Gutierrez.
Then there is this other lie that he "he didn't like it if I would want
to call a girl or something".
Wade never said this (and he sure was chasing girls often enough), the Cascios never said this, Mac, Brett never said such a thing. Where is this supposed pattern?
But you can read in Gutierrez book that when Prince Albert and Princess Elizabeth were on the ranch Jordan liked her and MJ then sent them home.
Which is BS we know what really happened because Princess Elizabeth wrote about her experiences in Neverland and no such thing as being jeolous or sending them home ever happened. She and her brother only said nice things
Michael had everything a child’s heart could possibly desire.We played for hours…He loved throwing water bombs and super soaking one another.He really turned into a kid.He didn’t mind his hair getting drenched and the make-up he was wearing washing off,he was enjoying himself and that was that.We were young enough to enjoy the children’s paradise but old enough to really remember and realize how special this actually was.
https://www.tumblr.com/search/Princess-Elizabeth-von-Thurn-und-Taxis
This is typical NAMBLA shit. He is in love with Jordan Chandler so he treats him like any lover would being jealous of girls he likes. What a load of crap!
Safechuck should be forced to answer while Gutierrez's obvious lies ended up in his story.
Same with Chandler.
Geez, I'd like to cross-examine these mofos.
And for this lie alone I would like to slap him:
But you voluntarily went back there. You could have said, I don't want to go up to
Neverland again, right?"
"Yeah."
"So why did you go back?"
"Because regardless of the fact that I went to Neverland, he would be with me. No matter
what, he was always with me. It was like, I couldn't just say I don't want to hang out with you
today."
He went back to Neverland because he wanted to not because MJ would have been with him no matter what.
He told his father that even if he told him not to go he would still go on the tour. Did he say that because
he didn't have a choice MJ would always be with him? What bullshit!
Ryan White's mother saw him on the ranch in July 1993 and said that Jordan behaved like a normal 13 year old, he was not afraid of MJ, not uncomfortable at all. Same if you watch the WMA 1993. He is smilling, singing sitting on MJ's chair and that was supposedly after he was molested and things got out of control in that Monaco hotel.
And remember what he told Evan and he asked him about sex between the two?
"That's disgusting I'm not into that"
And then to Garner he tells this:
"Most men, when they masturbate - whether they be masturbated by someone else or doing
it alone - most men have some thoughts in their mind. Sometimes they don't but most often
they do. When he was masturbating you, what thoughts were in your mind?"
"Um, I thought, it's weird. It's like it didn't feel right but yet it felt good,
and he was a friend so I didn't stop him."
So which one? Not into it or it felt good?
Remember how the Sandusky victims freaked out when he touched them how they tried to scream how they tried to run away from him.
But this prick wants us to believe that he didn't stop it because it felt good even though he was not into it and it was disgusting.
Of course he could have said I don't want to hang out with you today. MJ didn't force him and his mother to be with him.
Of course he would had stopped him and never go back to him if he had indeed molested him.
And he wouldn't have told Evan on July 1993 that he liked Michael if this had been true:
"But are you saying through all of this, although you enjoyed it, you felt a sense of
pressure?"
"Yeah."
"Was it a big heavy on you? Do you know what - -
"
"Yeah."
Big heavy? Does he look like he has some big heavy on him?
And just which real abuse victim behaves like this right after telling his horrible story of molestation?
Evan was startled. He expected Jordie to come out heavy-hearted, but the boy seemed exuberated, almost whimsical. “Are you okay?” Evan asked, wrapping his arms around the boy.
“Yeah, Pops. Let’s go, I’m starved.”
Hm all right. So Gavin Arvizo tells jokes to the grand jury and Jordan Chandler seems exuberated almost whimsical.
Typical behavior which we could see during the Sandusky trial, right?
These bastards have no conscience. They are pure evil, no other explanation for how they could do this to MJ while smiling and joking and having fun.
