[Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Guys my stomach is really hurting now and he got the nervous to say MJ Real Legacy.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

No need to overdramatize it. It is a website where anyone can create any T-shirt they want. They sold exactly 3 pieces of it. Probably to themselves. Something like this doesn't have the power to change MJ's legacy. LOL.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

We can create our own t-shirts showing we can not let these b@$^@#%$ violate Michael's name and legacy.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I think their all looney tunes. T-shirts? :blink:

I think some of them defo are loonies, but their head master is someone who has serious obsession with Michael and is personal.
Otherwise they would be after Elvis, Jerry Lee Lewis, that football guy and tons of others, but all of his attention is directed at Michael, and seemingly it annoys hell out of him that Michael's legacy still stands strong, not matter what crap people are trying to do.

This is something that Demon D or Stacy B would do in their spare time, which they have plenty.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

there are a lot of monsters they could go after, but Michael's fan base is so large (and comes with a 'rabid' reputation) so it's easy.
They can rile a bunch of people up.

Nobody will see these shirts except real fans. And they won't buy them. It's just another ploy for attention.

(I've actually seen way worse on 'legitimate' t-shirts.)

And yes, I can picture SB or DD doing stuff like this also.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I think some of them defo are loonies, but their head master is someone who has serious obsession with Michael and is personal.
Otherwise they would be after Elvis, Jerry Lee Lewis, that football guy and tons of others, but all of his attention is directed at Michael, and seemingly it annoys hell out of him that Michael's legacy still stands strong, not matter what crap people are trying to do.

This is something that Demon D or Stacy B would do in their spare time, which they have plenty.

Amen thanks Respect77


Anymore updated?
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Take flight and leave ,never to return.
Run away Robson.
Bye now.
 
myosotis;4116382 said:
More from W...............

CLI Studios and W R Creations are thrilled to announce a new artistic collaboration for our first, original dance film, “FLIGHT.” Coming 11/19/2015!

http://www.clistudios.com/flight

“The film was truly a collaboration of stunning talents, from the incredible performers to our very small superhero crew. I hope that the film inspires its audience both visually and emotionally as the viewer meets our characters at the apex of a dark period in their lives. The audience is then catapulted with these characters through an experience of the spirit that ultimately extracts the darkness and reinvigorates the internal light that is their true human nature.”

- Wade Robson, Director of FLIGHT


He already did this "from darkness to light" concept in that short film he did shot at Neverland. It seems like he can't come up with anything new.

[video=youtube;LQCkcXfH-CE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQCkcXfH-CE[/video]

He has no fantasy. I also think his films are pretentious.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

You know what I really hate about this? It's probably had a ton of views-all from Michael fans. Including me.
I hate thinking about Wade-I just despise him.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

If you mean the vid above it has just under 24,000 views since being posted in 2009. Not that many really. (I stopped it before it could play)
I'm sick of him. All of them. Wish they'd all just disappear for good down a hole somewhere.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Thanks Sarah-I can't see that from here so that makes me feel somewhat better.
I just feel like I'm in a hateful mood tonight and I wish I could get rid of all these people and change things that never ever should have happened in Michael's life.
Some days it gets to me worse than others, although it's never good.
 
myosotis;4116382 said:
More from W...............

CLI Studios and W R Creations are thrilled to announce a new artistic collaboration for our first, original dance film, “FLIGHT.” Coming 11/19/2015!

http://www.clistudios.com/flight

Hey Wade you associate film and dance with that horrible abuse, don't you remember?
You are not supposed to be doing shit like this.

Frankly, I can't fathom how Wade is planning to explain this in court.
That he managed to overcome all of that and he was wrong to say that he could never work in the entertainment business again?

I hope the Estate knows about all of these and also how they tried to sell MJ's picture on ebay while simultaneously accusing him.

Is anyone here in contact with the Estate? does anyone know how to contact them just to make sure they know about these things?
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

The Estate may know about it Wade not keep it a secret and then again the Estate may not even care. Wade is just doing this to get attention so ppls can say he trying to move on with life he has been through a terrible ordeal. Wade your lies are about to come to the light better run you and James and hide because God hate ugly your day is coming sooner then you think..
 
myosotis;4116382 said:
More from W...............

CLI Studios and W R Creations are thrilled to announce a new artistic collaboration for our first, original dance film, “FLIGHT.” Coming 11/19/2015!

http://www.clistudios.com/flight

Sorry Robson, but there's no way that dance film will bring much attention, you backstabbing lying creep!
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

He already did this "from darkness to light" concept in that short film he did shot at Neverland. It seems like he can't come up with anything new.


He has no fantasy. I also think his films are pretentious.

LOL yes, I've noticed that most of his creative outputs are pretty much the same thing over and over again, with very pretentious voice overs or narration.

That "album" he had for something was also just a blatant Dangerous moodboard rip off.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

LOL I had a chat with one of my facebook friends about Robson and this is what he said to me: "I believed him at first because I thought to myself, he's an emmy award winning choreographer who's accomplished so much in his life. There's no way that he would make up such a lie. It wouldn't be worth it, but then he starts talking about prophecies and how MJ was his lord and savior and wrote his destiny and that's when I realized that this guy has a few screws loose".
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

That why i hope the ppls will see that Wade is make this all up and on top of that trying to sue a dead man who is not here to defend himself. I say alots of loose screws.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I know everyone is entitled to an opinion and some have even publically supported Wade because they know him personally... We as much as I know the right thing is take it with a grain of salt... I can't but to be bitter to those who support Wade even if they know him and trust him..

Just being honest
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Wade Robson is bonkers end of story
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

If you mean the vid above it has just under 24,000 views since being posted in 2009. Not that many really.

I have a video of me riding a motorcycle I'd just bought that I uploaded in 2012 and that has 38,325 views and I'm a nobody.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROjhkvHk14A

What is that link? Can you give a description? I don't want to click on hater websites.

I don't blame you. One thing that can be done here if people want to look at what's being discussed is use a site like this:

http://www.donotlink.com/dnl/faq

It allows you to go to a website without giving that site any hits or strengthening their presence on google searches.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

LOL I had a chat with one of my facebook friends about Robson and this is what he said to me: "I believed him at first because I thought to myself, he's an emmy award winning choreographer who's accomplished so much in his life. There's no way that he would make up such a lie. It wouldn't be worth it, but then he starts talking about prophecies and how MJ was his lord and savior and wrote his destiny and that's when I realized that this guy has a few screws loose".
And to be that "award winner", Wade did it at the expence of Michael and still PRAISED MJ even in the court of LAW and had to go through a tough CROSS EXAMINATIONS which Wade did with flying colors. And why would MJ allow Wade to get on stand KNOWING he has to be CROSS EXAMINE IF MJ abused him knowing the world is watching and some wanting MJ to be convicted if he did it? That makes NO SENSE. If MJ abuse him, why would Wade still go on to do what the person who he is accusing to praise, honor, etc even AFTER DEATH? Also, getting an "award" is NOT the same as having money in your pocket and being jealous that the person you admired is now gone and you have not achieve nothing to that person status and you are still viewed "limited". There are "award winners" who are BROKE and they can be jealous of others who are doing well. Wade achieved SOME but he has NOT achieved alot (and even that small success was off the back of Michael Jackson).
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I know everyone is entitled to an opinion and some have even publically supported Wade because they know him personally... We as much as I know the right thing is take it with a grain of salt... I can't but to be bitter to those who support Wade even if they know him and trust him..

Just being honest
That still does not mean they believe Wade lies. There are people I know personally but I would not trust what they are saying unless God himself tells me they are telling the truth. I do not believe many people believe this nut.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Wade Robson support group is selling T-shirts.
I do not think most people care about these fools and to the people who are reading those shirts, that is MORE PROOF that these nuts want to make $$$ off of MJ by using lies. Again, you can not let at "few" fools make you think that EVERYONE is trashing MJ. Not true. "Remember, haters and jealous folks make the loudest noise". by STEVE HARVEY". So true.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

It does seem really personal. When I run into this or troll-y comments on newsfeeds or YouTube, I'm amazed that people have the time and intense hate to do that kind of trash talking.
Would be funny to be StaceyBrown or DD.
Every artists has these kind of haters.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I know everyone is entitled to an opinion and some have even publically supported Wade because they know him personally... We as much as I know the right thing is take it with a grain of salt... I can't but to be bitter to those who support Wade even if they know him and trust him..

Just being honest

Bah! Opinions are similar to lies, which I've stated before that I don't believe in opinions. Opinions are not very truthful. It's like saying they're taking Wade's lies over the actual truth.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Every artists has these kind of haters.
Very true. Vicious things are written about all artists on the internet. Really vicious.

It's different to me than other artists because they attack him for a truly heinous crime he did not commit or for his looks that he can not help because of autoimmune diseases.
But I really think it's a small handful of people doing it. I just hate new fans or people on the fence to read it.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Very true. Vicious things are written about all artists on the internet. Really vicious.

It's different to me than other artists because they attack him for a truly heinous crime he did not commit or for his looks that he can not help because of autoimmune diseases.
But I really think it's a small handful of people doing it. I just hate new fans or people on the fence to read it.

I agree. Yes, it ticks us off to read it but if I read them, I know what the deal. If someone really does not like someone, that person does NOT spend their day doing what these people do. In the era of the internet, some folks like to be trolls and just want to start nonsense. These people are either jealous of MJ for whatever reason or stupid.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

This post has nothing to do with the current cases, but is more directed to those who choose to discuss matters with doubters or
even haters somewhere on the internet, and about interpretations on why people might be on the fence.
Every once in a while in this thread I come across posts that talk about how much is it really worth to do that? It's mostly a troll
you're arguing with and not worth your time ect ect or how much influence do these haters really have.

I'm not really proud of how I "discovered" Michaels innocence, but since I did and I see these talks in here come up again and again,
I'm telling how it was for me. But for that I probably have to reach back to when I first became a fan. Anyone who doesn't want to read this
long nonsense post has my understanding.

When the first allegations hit I was only a kid. Michael was my first huge crush. I loved him dearly. I didn't admit that at first though.
Not because of those allegations, but because my elder sisters were fans too. And since they used to bully me I didn't want to side
with them on anything. So it was simply a matter of principle. Goes to show you though that even the loudest MJ hater is just a fan
in the closet LOL.
Anyway, once those allegations hit I didn't understand them at all. I KNEW what child molestation was. Heck, I am a victim myself. But I didn't
see it in this case. All I saw was a fun guy who loved rollercosters to put it simple.
Enter my teenage years. I still loved him, but I got other music interests. I had my boygroup phase, my Houston/Carey phase, Soul, Rock'nRoll
I had my hard rock phase, I had my punk rock phase, heck, I lived it all. I still loved Michael, but he wasn't priority, and the allegations faded over
time and weren't an issue at all for anyone I remember meeting back in the day.
During my teenage years, it was more a matter of whenever he puts something out, I'm gonna be all in and whenever he rests in private, I won't care.
I almost missed Invincible, because that was the time I stopped listening to radio or watch MTV, because in my opinion it "all turned crap".
And lets face it, there wasn't much promotion to get you outside of that.
Anyway, back to the topic, enter Bashir bullshit. I was watching it with a dear friend of mine, who was a huge fan herself. Off topic, but noteworthy:
She suffered from borderline syndrome, and there were several occasions Michael and his art prevented her from cutting herself open.
So we watched that crap, and I was so confused. I felt incredible uncomfortable during that so called documentary, but I couldn't put my finger on it.
Something just wasn't right. But by that time, I was a young adult and I wasn't actively following MJ for years anymore. I felt conflict, and I didn't know
about what. I didn't really see anything wrong about MJ, but I was told there is something wrong. Frankly, I tried to forget about that documentary, probably
because I couldn't put my finger on what exactly was wrong back in the day, and that made me uncomfortable.

Looking back, I actually see comments like "If he did that, it's wrong but he didn't know any better" blahblah "He thought it was love" blahblah. Now that might sound sick to many of us, and it is. But I got my own explanation over time with that.
People were TOLD over not only years, but over more than a decade that MJ is a pedophile. That was wrong, but it settled down in the mindset. However, people still loved him. How many known pedophiles do you really know that are loved???
And don't try me with Polanski or something like that. He's still celebrated by the industry, but hardly by public. It's like with Michael they were told for so long that he's guilty, that even if they enter that mindset and say he's guilty, they still want to excuse him. They still feel for him. That doesn't happen with any other pedophele as far as I know.
It's just my interpretation but I think it's because their conscious was told that he's guilty for so long, while their subcouncious knows better. So they try to make sense of it and that's what they come up with lol.

About two years later, trial. I tried to avoid the news, and here enters my mindset on why it took me so long to get to the truth.
I was convinced that the media wouldn't tell me what's going on. No matter if he was guilty or not, I didn't feel like I would get the real answer from them.
I think I was kind of brainwashed, but not to the point of judging him guilty. More of "He might be guilty and if he is or isn't, I won't know."
I would give political correct answers to the issue like "I don't want to believe it, but I don't know". And that was the truth for me.
So I didn't really follow the trial, because I didn't feel I would get the truth either way. But I remember feeling a huuuuuge relief when I found out about the verdicts.
I was under the impression that you couldn't know unless you were there. Either in the bedroom or whatever, or in the courtroom. And whatever happens in both
of those won't be able to be public knowledge. I was still a bit new to the internet, and I had certainly no idea that actual documents could be looked in by the public.
Basically, I had already lost my faith in the media anyway, and I didn't know I could research facts myself, so I just turned off the tv, got on with my life
and tried to not think about it, because I thought it was in vain anyway to get to the truth.

I will skip MJ's death here, that is a whole other chapter, and I'm already writing more than probably necessary. And now enter the part I am ashamed of.
It was Wade freaking Robson. Once I learned about his allegations, I lost my cool. But not in the way you might think. I didn't curse him or anything. Remember, I was still
in political correct mode that "I can't know unless I was there". And I was still sure that no matter how much you google, you won't know the actual truth.
But that is where I lost my cool. I did google.
And guess what: Haters love soooo much to argue that because you are a fan you only look for the innocent part of the argument and refuse the damaging ones.
Well, **** off. Because that was the opposite of me. Not because I believed Wade, but because I was finally ready to accept and face anything I might find.
I wanted MJ to be innocent, not only for him but also for the kids, but I was also finally ready to face possible evidence to the contrary. So there haters,
I am the opposite of what you claim a fan is. Once I was ready to face the facts, I was ready to FACE IT ALL!

Granted, I still didn't believe I would get FACTS. I simply believed I would get swayed towards one direction given the stories I might find. Because, remember, I still didn't
know that official documents and similar stuff were open to public.
I started off reading a few articles here and there. But those articles didn't do anything for my knowledge. Over time, I realized that not the articles or videos were the
interesting source, BUT THE COMMENTS. There were trolls in there, yes. On both sides actually. All those MJ haters (probably from MJfacts looking back) and some
overemotional MJ stans. Thing is, MJ haters might get you for a split second if they don't lose their cool within their first post, but they will lose you once an educated
person answers back. I read those comments. Suddenly I found myself with links to freaking official court documents, testimonies ect ect, things I had no idea existed for
the public. I was overwhelmed. I was hooked like I was reading a freaking John Grisham novel because I couldn't fathom all the fukery that was part of this (and frankly, I still can't).
BUT funny enough, I STILL tried to look out for evidence against MJ. Because I didn't want to be a blind stan. I wanted to be sure I got it all covered. Even when I was
already convinced he was innocent I was STILL looking out for arguments from those who claim otherwise. Thats how much I am "politically correct". I gave them the benefit of
doubt for freaking months.
Truth is, I read the commentaries on IDK how many articles or videos, and it is always the same when it comes to this issue. You have a few "haters for life", a few
"I'm just a troll because I got a boring day", a few "MJ is an angel and if you can't see that then rot in hell" (won't help you sweethearts, trust me. Not a good argument) and
then you have those who are educated on these cases and slay with evidence AND most important links to that evidence, so your word is not empty.)

It was those comments that got me. I got to see for myself what kind of liars those accusers were. I didn't have to take the word from the media, nor from the hater, nor from
the fan... I got it right there from their own testimonies.
Part of me actually feels like I failed MJ, even though I never jumped on the bandwagon, simply because I also never actively jumped on the defense train.
Anyway, to this very day, I never made a comment on YT or ANY news article, I do own a twitter account but I don't use it (don't even know how to) and so on and so on.
I don't comment, unless it's a forum.
BUT better be sure that I read. I know what's going on, and so do several thousands of people out there.
You feel like you arguing with a troll on youtube is in vain? It is not! I myself don't do it because I tend to get emotional. Not in the "Leave my bb alone asshole" way,
but emotional enough that you shouldn't enter debates LOL
You won't convince the troll. Know that! You won't. You usually know when you're talking with a hater troll lost in cause or with an actual curious person just uneducated
within two messages.
HOWEVER, when arguing with a troll, throw all the links and evidence in there within 3 messages and then leave it alone. The troll will still argue. The lurker however understood.
And the lurkers are the majority. It was my experience years ago and this is the first time I'm sharing this, because frankly I am embarrassed that it took me so long.

Know that you are not writing for the trolls, but for the lurkers.
My motto is "Hate is always louder, but that doesn't mean love isn't bigger".
Haters are loud, but those who want to know the truth and love are the majority.


Anyway, long post of rambling, but I hope some of you truth fighters out there got some new motivations. And I want to come back to some earlier statement in my post.
I said back in the early nineties I simply saw Michael as a fun dude who loved rollercosters. I didn't understand all the things said about him. They didn't make sense.
Now imagine a little child watching that Bashir bullshit. I bet if you put a child in front of it, it won't see anything wrong either. All it will see is a fun dude
that likes to climb trees.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Thank you for that post Dianne, it's really good to read things like that. My story is similar to yours, I was also a lurker reading debates on this subject and it was reading those debates that got me interested and looking for the information. I had no idea there was so much out there from the courts and even from the accusers and their parents and others until I really started digging. I'd seen things from fans and haters but it was the level-headed fans who were giving the most reliable information that could be backed up with proper evidence. I have a thread on this site about debates with people regarding MJ and the allegations, I debate people for the same reason you mentioned, the lurkers. Hardly anyone ever changes their mind as a result of a debate with another person, but those reading are in a different position, they aren't being directly challenged and as such, they have less to lose. Since I started as a lurker I know that debates are handy for those who really want to learn and you're another person who is proof of that. The thread I mentioned is here if you're interested in taking a look.

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/threads/133197-Debates-with-the-public
 
Back
Top