^^I would not be surprised at all.
Also, it's just so annoying how they take the simplest, most innocent things (because that's all they have) and try to twist it and use it as some type of 'evidence'. Which, again, is only showing their lack of
actual 'evidence'.
For instance, JS commenting about the tape Michael used on his nose, I remember reading about that a while ago too and it was worded something like 'he even knew his 'bedtime rituals', such as putting tape on his nose before going to bed' and that this showed how 'close' they were. Like.. really? That's the big secret?:smilerolleyes: You don't have to be 'that close' to Michael to know about that, there's like a 100 pictures and videos of him wearing it, lol.
Or calling him Rubba, just one of his common nicknames.. What does that even prove? Are they trying to say it's supposed to be something sexual..?
I remember he called Emmanuel Lewis Rubba about 5 times in that '84 Grammy footage, lol. Or are they going to claim he molested him too?
That's another thing, maybe they're trying to drag Brett into it because it's just completely unlikely that an actual pedophile would spend so much time hanging out and sharing beds with one kid and do
nothing, but molest another. That just does not make any sense, so they probably feel like they have to insinuate he was another 'victim' to make their own claims sound more credible.
