Isn't there some kind of regulation to band the practice of fraudulent/questionable treatments?
Unconscious mental life is a core assumption in insight-oriented therapy. This means that there is a belief that your problems, symptoms, and general discomforts are rooted in, or caused by, something that is occurring inside you, but about which you do not yet know. The primary method of therapy becomes making the unconscious conscious. In this manner you become free of the heretofore unknown blockages that prevent you from your best level of functioning.
Some people are uncomfortable with the idea of unconscious mental life. The initial primary task of the therapy, however, is to illustrate that unconscious mental life exists inside of you, examine the evidence of it, and find ways to use your increased conscious knowledge of it for the betterment of your life. While the methods and techniques of the therapy can become quite complicated, it is mostly (but not solely) the therapist's job to worry about and handle these complications. Everything that happens in the therapy springs directly from the concepts discussed here.
As insight-oriented psychotherapy is a client-centered therapy, it is assumed that the client is healthy and their problem is a result of faulty-thinking.[SUP][4][/SUP][SUP][5][/SUP]
Insight-oriented psychotherapy is also used often and in conjunction with medication for treating depression. However, it is less suited for the afflicted individual who is especially emotional/sensitive, has little self-awareness, and is dealing with a major life problem.[SUP][23][/SUP]
Insight-oriented psychotherapy is also used often and in conjunction with medication for treating depression. However, it is less suited for the afflicted individual who is especially emotional/sensitive, has little self-awareness, and is dealing with a major life problem.
And there you have it in a nutshell, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you very much.This action by Robson is just an extreme grudge exercise. and that's all there is to it.
Robson feels under-appreciated (no monetary rewards) for being MJ supporter all his life. When he was rejected for the cirque du soleil gig, that's where the straw broke the camel's back.
It's the same pattern with other false accusers: Revenge for money.
This action by Robson is just an extreme grudge exercise. and that's all there is to it.
Robson feels under-appreciated (no monetary rewards) for being MJ supporter all his life. When he was rejected for the cirque du soleil gig, that's where the straw broke the camel's back.
It's the same pattern with other false accusers: Revenge for money.
And there you have it in a nutshell, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you very much.
What evidence is there that he was rejected for the cirque job? All i've read is that the estate have said wade left his role as his son was sick. Why would the estate claim this if they could suggest that a firing from one of their projects could have prompted this so called grudge?This action by Robson is just an extreme grudge exercise. and that's all there is to it.
Robson feels under-appreciated (no monetary rewards) for being MJ supporter all his life. When he was rejected for the cirque du soleil gig, that's where the straw broke the camel's back.
All i've read is that the estate have said wade left his role as his son was sick.
^ I wonder if it really was his son who got sick or rather he had a bad period due to his mental illness. Probably the latter. I can only see someone leaving a job due to his kid's illness if it's a serious illness, but his son looks to be healthy, with no major health issues that would have to make Wade leave jobs.
there was a rumor / claim that his son has autism. It's been never confirmed though.
He's full of contradictions. Also, I found a picture of Wade's lawsuit. It tries to hold water, but it just doesn't.
It not good to hold a grudge against a person end the end it will get you.
there was a rumor / claim that his son has autism. It's been never confirmed though.
it wouldn't surprise me either, but since he claims Michael's companies knew and were complicit in abuse and most of those people are still around, they could sue.If this case get's tossed I can still see Wade doing the media rounds and giving interviews. I also wouldn't be surprised if he writes a book. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if he's working on writing a book right now
^ by Jordan's uncle, right?
If i was those ppls i would sue Wade he has yet to prove that this was happening and somebody in the companies knew about it that like accusing them of something that they did not know about no one has came forward and said this was happening.