Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate
You guys do know that thats me in the video right? lol what mistakes are in the video?
OK.
Repressed memory: The shake downer Wade never said it was repressed. TMZ claimed that a family source told them. Then Wade's attorney said in a career trajectory last year he had a collapse under the weight of the molestation and other nonsense. Wade states in the video that it was never repressed, because he no doubt heard about the repressed debate. So right now we have no evidence that it was repressed. Wade never said so, and his scumbag attorney did not say so either. The only how we will know what the original thing is, is if we look at the filing but the key parts are sealed.
What you can do is say something like Wade's attorney said this and then Wade comes on tv and said something else. Then you state what Wade said and what his attorney said. The key is that the attorney should know when and why, but if both are saying something different then we have a big alert for liar, liar pants on fire.
He knew all the time: You mention Wade said this but the rest of what you say is not what Wade said. Wade used the word "understand" and you have to use that to show your viewers that a 22 year old is saying he did not understand the actions. You explained about the 22 year old part correctly, but add "understand," because it really shows how unbelievable he is. Also, these reporters are rephrasing Wade's words and meaning already, like the woman who said Wade said "he did not come to terms with it yet." Now that is completely different from using the word understand as Wade used it. The way she is using it, she is giving the impression that "Wade was weighing this thing in his mind and he is debating with himself saying I was abused. I can't believe it. Did Michael really do this thing to me." The way she is phrasing it, makes it more reasonable for people to believe Wade, because many people have not come to terms with their abuse. However, when you say you did not understand, that makes people stand up and say are you for real.
AEG & child abuse. You said that AEG brings in the child abuse etc. and the judge threw it out. If you go to the case thread with the motions you will get some information about that part. AEG said Michael was proven innocent so they were not going to bring up the child abuse case. The judge ruled that the allegations can be used to show that especially during the allegations the drug use may increase. [I think what may have caused confusion was that Panish was asking that AEG not bring up certain things. Then AEG would say we are not opposing because we had no intention of bringing that up in court. Off my head 1 of the issues Panish asked that should not be brought up was the paternity of children and AEG said they are not opposing because they had no intention of bringing that up.]
I am assuming you are trying to link AEG & the child abuse issue in the court to Wade & his allegations?
I would like to give you a critique if you are not offended. You are on a video where you are explaining a very important issue. Many people will see it, since fans are posting it around. Therefore, keep the facts together and then put in the parts where you are using your own thoughts and feelings together. If you mix both up as facts, then a nonbeliever can say look this guy writes about an AEG conspiracy without facts, so how can we believe him. So when you come to where you talk about AEG, you can say something like you find the timing odd that there is a current case between AEG & Katherine where drugs and the allegations comes up, and then Wade files his case on 5/1. In this way the viewer knows you are making your own connections. You don't want to mislead & you keep your video factual and scholarly.
