Moddie777
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,791
- Points
- 0
Nice .........
:eat:
MJbabe21, I really love you! You are so Encouraging and Sweet. Your enthusiasm keeps me going!
Nice .........
:eat:
MJbabe21, I really love you! You are so Encouraging and Sweet. Your enthusiasm keeps me going!
Hahahaha. Okey dokey, queenie.
Thanks for bring up mystery again, Ape. MJ wants the special one to help him make the mysteries unfold. Hmmmm. Unfold where? Unfold for whom? Unfold in privave? Or untold before the world? Maybe it's a bit of both. Unfold for them, unfold for everyone.
"Searching for that one who's gonna make me whole. Help me make these mysteries unfold."
Moddie777 recently brought up MJ's poem titled "Two Birds." In it he said:
"It's hard to tell them what I feel for you. They haven't ever met you, and no one has your picture. So how can they ever understand your mystery? Let's give them a clue:"
So, I guess this clearly means he doesn't want his love for someone to remain a mystery. What would be the point of giving a clue? Yet, some of the clues that he's dropping are for her only and will remain a mystery.
Keep the magnifying glasses close by! LOL
I'm wondering if she brought him the type of love that never interferes as he mentions in "Two Birds." It seems like it would be one of his requirements since he mentioned it. It also seems like he would want this to be ongoing while he and she are heading to that happy ending that he's been looking for.
Keep those magnifying glasses near by. lol
oh ok thanks for that Wall - E explanation.In Wall-E he watches this film in which two people hold hands, and he is drawn in by this. He longs to hold the hand of another and almost seems to long to understand it. He first holds his own hand, then later on, he tries holding the hand of the girl robot who came to his world, yearning for the chance to hold it. It was a mini theme in the movie. Very sweet.
What you mentioned, SOS, could be another thing to add, sure.
What made you say they don't really know each other, when you said "I'm wondering ............. now if they've not really known eachother how he could know something like that ..............about her I mean ......... unless ....*thinking* unless maybe he sensed it about her..........that she is one to "live and let live" offerring herself only when and where needed .."
How can they not know each other if they are in love? They must know at least the important things, more than looks and all that superficial stuff, I would think. Just wondered why you thought he doesn't know her well.
AllforMJ yes that was the persons post I was referring to regarding the two birds. I can completely understand the other interpretation of it (that had come from MJ himself) though I can also see another possibility in it.
MEI remembered a little mention / explanation a friend of mine had about "Two Birds", saying it was inspired by an Indian philosophy, I think. And I think she meant Kabir, or someone else. Michael is very inspired by Oriental mysticism anyway, and its beliefs are wonderful. I found a poem belonging to a poet called Michael Shepherd, poem inspired by Kabir, another poet and visionary. And it wrote:
Two Birds In A Tree
Two birds rest on the same tree; their eyes are bright; they look alike; yet one is the Teacher; one the Student; the Student tastes all the many fruits upon that tree; the Teacher sits, just watches, filled with love and pride; the eyes of both are bright; when the Student has tasted all, the Teacher asks what has been learnt; for only the Teacher knows within their heart: that now the Student is the teacher; the Teacher listens as a student; the Student speaks now as a teacher who has learned this of themself; the Teacher’s eyes are bright: knowing that to live it through shows the knowledge to be true; the Student is teaching the Teacher now, of how to teach; the Teacher glows to know the Student may surpass the Teacher; knowledge shines from both their eyes; who is the more glorious of these two who share both the same name? who rejoice to need the other; who rejoice to be the other; now they are silent; now the tree’s rejoicing too; Its roots above; its fruits below; its leaves, a shelter; its branches, home.* [ Leaning on a poem of Kabir: Indian readers will be familiar with 'two birds in a tree' as a metaphor for acting with detachment; Kabir takes this further, into knowledge gained from wise action...]
I copied and pasted it, and it even though it was a poem, it pasted itself strangely. It had stanzas anyway, I hope it can be clear nonetheless. I thought it somehow explains Michael's poem. It is an interchanging role, apparently, that they take, that of the Teacher and its student..Or of God and the child..Michael is a complex human being, he must have also included these subjects, too..He tells us, apparently, that he is both a child, and a wise person, both a slave and a master, like he says in the "Planet Earth" poem. I think he empathizes with a more profound knowledge, that of loving silently, wisely, with that peaceful, sitting, invisible bird..When feeling at one with God, he too becomes invisible..Yet, it also to his soul..His soulmate, most likely, which he yearns to be at one with with..Michael Shepherd's poem, though, I realize it's about the birds actually finding each other and living in a home at last, in the same tree; it tells about a happy finality, about the birds being both silent now, as though finally at peace and content, or as though the restless soul has finally found its peace..Beautiful how in this poem, it is mentioned something about the other's appearance, actually both of theirs: they are said to look alike, to be alike, to have their name alike, alluding to equality as well..To be one and the same figuratively speaking, or not necessarily..
Both poems are wonderful, as well as their inspiration..
the analogy is incredible, and both these poems are based on the Indian philosophy of the Master becoming one and the same with the pupil. Both the poems focus on the 2 birds, on the fruits one (both of them) eats, on silence and watching the other silently from beyond, only that Michael’s poem hasn’t had a finality at the time he wrote it. He was wistful.
His poem has multiple interpretations, I agree: he refers to either a loved one ( and we talked about it thoroughly), to God and himself, and how he wants the world to be able to see his soul, rather than just his physical, larger-than-life presence (the bird’s spectacular flight, food choices etc), he wants the world to see him as a human being with a large heart and a humble presence. Just like he wants to find peace of mind, and he makes it patent by lovingly describing the other bird, the quiet, invisible one, sounding as though he himself would want to identify with its nature, of being anonymous, invisible and at peace („your silence is so precious”)..He must be that mysterious too, because he wants to find equilibrium between the very seen and the very unseen. This reminds me of what you said about Wall-E’s theme, and when he founds a female robot, meaning someone of the same kind that could understand him, Wall-E seemingly trying to break free from his ‚unconfortable’ condition and wanting to do things that free human beings can do. Michael drew this little robot, too, on occasion of the L’Uomo Vogue issue, with the message: „I don’t want to be a robot”, doing perfect things all the time that are imposed by others, meaning he doesn’t want to be controlled, he wants to be able to breathe from that ‚invisible air” of the freer bird he extols..
From the same rare interview I mentioned to you before (from 1991), where he said how he would like his ideal person to be, he also said that, at the time, there was ‚no one special’ in his life, which adds to the meaning of the poem, and also, he added „No one knows the real Michael”, and this could tie with what he says about the other bird, the silent one no one knows about or no one has seen, meaning he identifies with both birds..He often feels misunderstood, prompting him to conclude such drastically..
MEWhen he was married the first time, he still sung about being lonely („YANA”: „I’m still all alone” ; or in „Stranger in Moscow”: „I’m living lonely!”), being intent in what he sung..He was married, but he never lived with LMP, but ocasionally, and he never lived with Debbie Rowe either, even though he loved both of them, especially the former..After his first divorce, he said something along the lines that it wasn’t mean to be and you have to respect that, him being awfully Destiny-guided too. „Invincible” the album spoke a lot about loneliness again, and he even said in the LWMJ documentary that ‚if there is a girl”, he would give her jewelry and things like that, basically answering there isn’t one, or, most of all, the one; and in 2004, during the trial, he gave an interview to director and friend Bret Rattner, where he would list his favorite songs, some about loneliness, others about a lost childhood and others about the world’s well-being / problems..So, it’s pretty much conclusive adding that he wasn’t with her in the flesh all that time..And even before, otherwise he wouldn’t have married, and would have waited for her..In 2008, „For All Time” was released, an unexpected choice for „Thriller 25”, theme-wise, composition-wise etc, speaking again of the future, of his hope that his words could warm her in his absence or until they finally meet, either for the first time, or in the flesh for the first time. It again sounds like a distance type of love „if you feel alone” / ‚for this good love undeceiving, I’d go anywhere”..He’d do anything to find this kind of love, he’d ‚sail the seven seas to be near her’, like he sings in „One More Chance”..
So, I don’t mean to sound too mystical, and I only gave a few song examples, but I think he still fights for these ideals, whether he knows who she is or prays that she is there somewhere..Somehow, I don’t feel a 2 persons presence , except from, maybe, at a distance..And those songs like „Break Of Dawn” or „Beautiful Girl” or „The Way You Love Me” could be based on either memories or on his idealist imagination, and they are contrast with some others, like, when you’d think he finally found her, you realize he actually didn’t, and he’d be singing like that all his life. He could have went online a few times to confess about his love and what he expects in return, I don’t know, but if he did indeed inserted a certain somebody in his latest message addressed to his fans, he isn’t with her yet, but feels her presence like he has said in those poems or songs..
Sorry about these long posts. I wanted to offer my own personal opinion, of course, and also that based on a gut-feeling, somehow, or the fact that he is such a perfectionist about everything, and even based on practically all the astrology interpretations of him I came across..And if, every bit of a song or lyric could prove to undergo such fierce manipulations and high expectations, this could tie with him saying he wants to find a love that is so divine and perfect and pure and such..That is him, and if these lines make sense, I hope he doesn’t end up being alone..): Especially since all his life, he has had this restless soul of wanting to help other people all the time, with little care to his own needs, thus him ending up to be used that many times, and he is still saying how much he wants to please his fans and do everything he can for them, or for his children, and he rarely ever mentions himself personally, except for when it has to do with his career..I do sympathize with that, because he has been hurt countless times before, and wants to be wary, and as he said years ago, he is ‚suspicious’, or in the phone tapes..I think he realizes today that he too could use peace of mind, a little more focus to himself, hopefully..If we can say that, given such information, or portions of it, we have to wait and see what his new album will disclose, so that we know of his current situation for sure..