Did MJ Find Love In The Dark (continued)

[MysteriousPhoenix]

All I can say is good thing I like Kermy! Otherwise....man! Overkill in this thread!! Nah, I can't ever get enough of the little guy who sings one of my most favorite songs EVAH! Rainbow Connection!!! :wub:

I love that song too!

I think I just might know which one you are referring to. And Lisa Marie is not center stage in that one, but off to the side.

That is the one!

This idea of "her" entertaining him reminded me of something I had been thinking about last week when I had watched some Peter Pan related movies. I asked the question, "What was it about Wendy that made her so special to Peter?" Afterall, he must have visited London loads, and spied into many windows with many other little girls playing or sleeping within. So what was it about Wendy?

It was the way she told stories.

It always stood out to me something I read in Joe Jackson's book that he had published in Germany....he was speaking about what drew him to Katherine. And he said it was the way she expressed herself in letters. Her writing.

Maybe MJ and his LITD girl (if she exists) communicated via emails like Joe and Katherine communicated back and forth in letters. Maybe the LITD girl told MJ stories...creative stories, or even stories out of her own life. Maybe her stories "entertained" him.

Hmmm....

Wow! I didn't know that about Joe and Katherine. Very interesting. Maybe MJ and his LITD were Joe and Katherine all over again! It's interesting that MJ (like his alter ego, Peter Pan, heh, heh) would be drawn to someone because of the way they tell stories. I guess in a way it does make sense, but at the same time, you would think it would be something more grand like perhaps the way she sang or something like that. Hmmm...

 

[Lisha]

You mean kermit??....here he is!

Even you, 8701girl? Even you are posting the Wild Kermit image?!!!


:tease:

 

[Roxa]

She could have been someone so frail he could break if he hugged too tight, but at the same time she should have been a pretty tough cookie if she was gonna be by his side cause she would have had to deal with a lot of crap from fans and media (part of the job description i guess lol) and yes, even some from him cause contrary to certain beliefs the man wasn't perfect. He must have had his faults and flaws of character, right?

At the same token, wouldn't it be nice if, for once, she would have been the one doing the entertaining? All his life Michael sang and danced, mesmerized the masses with his art, but as it was suggested here in the thread wouldn't it be great to think that she might have sung and maybe even danced for him? Perhaps she was an industry gal, cause we know what they say about people sharing the same job understanding each other so well, maybe she was a complete amateur, in any case i thought that was a lovely thought – if, at least with her, he could put down the mic and the dancing shoes and just enjoy the show for once.

And since i mentioned Asian traditions earlier, here goes a most beautiful music video from the early 90s – Always from Erasure. I remember being totally fascinated by it. I was reminded of it earlier this morn when they played it on tele before the daily dose of Michael vids. I bet some of yall went and 'put' Michael in that role rescuing the damsel in distress lol

And still. This is a interesting line of thought. If this girl was a person that wasn't in middle of music bussiness world this probabily interesting him becase she was different of him and she brought things and moments that he never had.

But in other had, if she was a entertenair like him, maybe he fell in love for her because she was like him and understood him and the way of his life!

Oh God I'm becoming a psychologist here! :wild:

 

[Lisha]

Oh God I'm becoming a psychologist here! :wild:

But you're enjoying yourself, right?

Wow! I didn't know that about Joe and Katherine. Very intersting. Maybe MJ and his LITD were Joe and Katherine all over again!

That would be sweet! aww. :wub:

I guess in a way it does make sense, but at the same time, you would think it would be something more grand like perhaps the way she sang or something like that. Hmmm...

Well, hmm, just like the way he wasn't too worried about if everyone in the world thought she was pretty or not, just as long as "he" found something pretty about her, that's what mattered...(this being based on the adlib lyric in P.Y.T. "She's a P.Y.T. - to me!") I would think the same would apply to her singing voice. Maybe all that mattered to him was that he was blessed by her singing, not if everyone else in the world would be. Probably didn't matter to him if she could make it in the music biz...I wouldn't even be surprised if he would have preferred her not to. He was around all that all the time; he might have wanted her to be separate from that, ya know?


EDIT:

For those who do not know which painting MP is referring to, but would like to, here is a part of the painting for you to see:

This gives you an idea. The look on MJ's face is quite mesmerizing. The concept for this painting used by Brett Livingstone Strong was not an original one...he copied it from an existing classic painting. However, the girl you see here pulling MJ towards her does not resemble the girl in the original painting who is doing the same thing to a male (who obviously also looks nothing like MJ). Many of the surrounding water nymphs do, though, closely resemble the girls in the original. The main girl in the original also has pale, ivory skin like all the other water nymphs, but you can see here that this girl's skin tone is the same as MJ's. Intentional? Is it her natural skin color or a tan on her? More unanswered questions.

 

[Ashtanga]

My God... I'm offline and when I come back, happened all this here? >>>

:lol:

Its ok to dream bout being with michael in that way....hey dont we all! :naughty: :lol:

Yes..... :naughty:

You really love our lil kermit friend dont u

I love that frog! :yes: :wub:

Okie Dokie! BTW, Lainy (formerly known as Lully! lol!), there's another painting floating around, by another artist, that just may have depicted his LITD. I would post it, but it's a little "indecent."

Indecent? :shifty: :naughty: I'm very curious to see it. :wild:

Thanks Sdeidjs! This, along with Ash's PM, really uplifted my spirits today.

:cheeky: >>>> :hug:

What!??? You and I will have to take out our swords and have ourselves a duel! To the death! Just kidding! I'll compromise with you. You can be in that pic and I'll be the angel in WYBT.

WHAT? :lol:

So, we are agree, I will be LITD girl and you'll be the angel in WYBT. -_-

:lol:

MP will probably look a little like this ...

:lol:

We will all look like Kermit... >>> Crazy!!!! :wild:

 

[wendijane]

love that frog

 

[8701girl]

Even you, 8701girl? Even you are posting the Wild Kermit image?!!!


:tease:

Yes even i have to admit i have become addicited to this lil green fella

 

[8701girl]

My God... I'm offline and when I come back, happened all this here? >>>

:lol:

:lol:

Yes..... :naughty:

:naughty:

I love:wub: that frog! :yes:

Me too!

 

[MysteriousPhoenix]

... Well, hmm, just like the way he wasn't too worried about if everyone in the world thought she was pretty or not, just as long as "he" found something pretty about her, that's what mattered...(this being based on the adlib lyric in P.Y.T. "She's a P.Y.T. - to me!")

Funny you should mention this. The last couple of times I heard P.Y.T. on the radio, that particular part (- to me!) really stood out to me. I keep thinking, what exactly is he implying there?:lol:

I would think the same would apply to her singing voice. Maybe all that mattered to him was that he was blessed by her singing, not if everyone else in the world would be. Probably didn't matter to him if she could make it in the music biz...I wouldn't even be surprised if he would have preferred her not to. He was around all that all the time; he might have wanted her to be separate from that, ya know?

Yeah, I always thought "her" being in show biz would make him a little "nervous" to say the least.

EDIT:

For those who do not know which painting MP is referring to, but would like to, here is a part of the painting for you to see:

This gives you an idea. The look on MJ's face is quite mesmerizing. The concept for this painting used by Brett Livingstone Strong was not an original one...he copied it from an existing classic painting. However, the girl you see here pulling MJ towards her does not resemble the girl in the original painting who is doing the same thing to a male (who obviously also looks nothing like MJ). Many of the surrounding water nymphs do, though, closely resemble the girls in the original. The main girl in the original also has pale, ivory skin like all the other water nymphs, but you can see here that this girl's skin tone is the same as MJ's. Intentional? Is it her natural skin color or a tan on her? More unanswered questions.

Hey, clever how you edited the pic! Your editing job not only hid the "indecent" parts, but managed to place the two people in the middle, front and center (and still allowed for MJ's precious Lisa Marie to be included.)

 

[Lainy]

Art and music are timeless. As it crosses cultural boundries, whether in words or in images, art has the power to speak the dreams of a generation. This power must be cherished, shared, respected, and above all, used for worthwhile endeavors. I am gratified to have affiliated with Brett Strong. He, like Michelangelo, is gifted, and like that great Renaissance artist, is a dynamic visionary.

~Michael Jackson

I love the way Michael talks about Art.

Originally Posted by queen g
The look on MJ's face is quite mesmerizing. The concept for this painting used by Brett Livingstone Strong was not an original one...he copied it from an existing classic painting. However, the girl you see here pulling MJ towards her does not resemble the girl in the original painting who is doing the same thing to a male (who obviously also looks nothing like MJ). Many of the surrounding water nymphs do, though, closely resemble the girls in the original. The main girl in the original also has pale, ivory skin like all the other water nymphs, but you can see here that this girl's skin tone is the same as MJ's. Intentional? Is it her natural skin color or a tan on her? More unanswered questions.

I don't no but maybe Brett has done it intecional to cause impact and highlight this artwork of the "Hylas and the Nymphs." The impression I have is that this way Brett Strong raises The nymph (Lisa) at the same level as Michael, since in mythology the nymphs were believed to be drawn to the "superior divinities" and eager to serve were and this artwork no, both are at the same level, making them equal but she differs from other nymphs because them still have the same concept as in mythology, to serve the superior divinities in this case, Michael.

Look at this:

Michael and Brett chose to recreate this magical and mythical scene due to Michael's own persona of peace and love. It is as if Michael saw himself in Greek mythology and immortality. What has been perceived to be a controversial painting is in fact a magical and romantic masterpiece of such depths few have understood until now.

The Michael's quote and this last quote I found here: http://thepassionportrait.com/index.html

 

[Lisha]

I love the way Michael talks about Art.

I don't no but maybe Brett has done it intecional to cause impact and highlight this artwork of the "Hylas and the Nymphs." The impression I have is that this way Brett Strong raises The nymph (Lisa) at the same level as Michael, since in mythology the nymphs were believed to be drawn to the "superior divinities" and eager to serve were and this artwork no, both are at the same level, making them equal but she differs from other nymphs because them still have the same concept as in mythology, to serve the superior divinities in this case, Michael.

Look at this:


The Michael's quote and this last quote I found here: http://thepassionportrait.com/index.html

and

Hey, clever how you edited the pic! Your editing job not only hid the "indecent" parts, but managed to place the two people in the middle, front and center (and still allowed for MJ's precious Lisa Marie to be included.)

Actually, girls, that is not the nymph that is supposedly meant to have LMP's likeness. She is way off to the far left in the full painting and is just in the role of one of the several (incidental) nymphs (maybe Lisa Marie requested that) looking on at the scene between MJ and the female that is "bewitching" him, sort of speak.

I would not have been able to include successfully the "LMP girl" and keep things "decent." Here she is pointed out below:

and the original nymph copied from is quite similar looking...

EDIT:

~ btw, here is the main section (the focal point) of the original "Hylas and the Nymphs" painting, with some more obvious editing going on by me due to my commitment to "modesty" (bear with me):

WHAT? :lol:

So, we are agree, I will be LITD girl and you'll be the angel in WYBT.

Wait NO!!! Ash, think about this for a moment! If you become the LITD girl you may turn into a fine mist then evaporate to nothing!!! For to you, the LITD girl does not exist! Oh my gosh, Ash, come back....you're fading...fading....noooooooooooooooooooo! Aaaaassssssshhh!

*shrugs shoulders*

Ash has disappeared.

 

[Ashtanga]

EDIT:

For those who do not know which painting MP is referring to, but would like to, here is a part of the painting for you to see:

and
Actually, girls, that is not the nymph that is supposedly meant to have LMP's likeness. She is way off to the far left in the full painting and is just in the role of one of the several (incidental) nymphs (maybe Lisa Marie requested that) looking on at the scene between MJ and the female that is "bewitching" him, sort of speak.

I would not have been able to include successfully the "LMP girl" and keep things "decent." Here she is pointed out below:

and the original nymph copied from is quite similar looking...

EDIT:

~ btw, here is the main section (the focal point) of the original "Hylas and the Nymphs" painting, with some more obvious editing going on by me due to my commitment to "modesty" (bear with me):

The nymph/girl looks like Lisa? >>>> :nono: She looks like me. :lol: Again, it's me and Michael together. -_- :wub:

:shifty:

Wait NO!!! Ash, think about this for a moment! If you become the LITD girl you may turn into a fine mist then evaporate to nothing!!! For to you, the LITD girl does not exist! Oh my gosh, Ash, come back....you're fading...fading....noooooooooooooooooooo! Aaaaassssssshhh!

*shrugs shoulders*

Ash has disappeared.

Who said I disappeared? :shifty: I'm always here, most of the time I'm hidden. Just observing all... :naughty:

Yes, for me the girl LITD not exists -_-, but I prefer to imagine that I am her. lol! :wub: :heart: I know, my imagination has gone too far. -_- But I do not care for it.... :blush: :wub:

 

[Roxa]

But you're enjoying yourself, right?

I'm enjoying! You're wonderful girls!

EDIT:

For those who do not know which painting MP is referring to, but would like to, here is a part of the painting for you to see:

This gives you an idea. The look on MJ's face is quite mesmerizing. The concept for this painting used by Brett Livingstone Strong was not an original one...he copied it from an existing classic painting. However, the girl you see here pulling MJ towards her does not resemble the girl in the original painting who is doing the same thing to a male (who obviously also looks nothing like MJ). Many of the surrounding water nymphs do, though, closely resemble the girls in the original. The main girl in the original also has pale, ivory skin like all the other water nymphs, but you can see here that this girl's skin tone is the same as MJ's. Intentional? Is it her natural skin color or a tan on her? More unanswered questions.

Oh really, this nymph is different of the others and is the only one that have a skin's tone darker. I think Brett had the intention to put her as a equal of MJ and a real girl, if she was Lisa. And also maybe his intetion was make she looks like that she is different of others and for being different, is the only one who has him. So, the LITD girl is so special! :wild:

 

[Roxa]

The Michael's quote and this last quote I found here: http://thepassionportrait.com/index.html

Interesting things in this link Lainy!

Michael portrayed in Geek mythology

A little known fact is that this artwork is a modern day remake of the world renowned painting by John William Waterhouse (1849-1917) entitled "Hylas and the Nymphs" and painted in 1897. This scene has also been recreated by other artists, most notably by Henrietta Rae. You will find photos of both these works on this website. The painting depicts a moment in Greek mythology where Hylas is lured into the spring by the nymphs. Notice the nymph pulling Michael by the arm and into the spring. Michael and Brett chose to recreate this magical and mythical scene due to Michael's own persona of peace and love. It is as if Michael saw himself in Greek mythology and immortality. What has been perceived to be a controversial painting is in fact a magical and romantic masterpiece of such depths few have understood until now.


A brief history about Hylas: In Greek mythology, beautiful youth. He was the son of Theiodamas, king of the Dryopes, and friend of Heracles. Heracles took him along on the Argonauts Expedition. When they reached the shores of Mysia, Hylas went ashore to find water. He found a spring, but the Nymphs of the water lured him into the deep. Hylas fell in love with the nymphs and remained with them to share in their powers..

And other thing interesting: in this site, the title of the page is Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley with nymphs. So, the girl holding MJ is not a nymph...:smilerolleyes: Was this the intetion of Brett?

 

[MysteriousPhoenix]

Actually, girls, that is not the nymph that is supposedly meant to have LMP's likeness. She is way off to the far left in the full painting and is just in the role of one of the several (incidental) nymphs (maybe Lisa Marie requested that) looking on at the scene between MJ and the female that is "bewitching" him, sort of speak.

I would not have been able to include successfully the "LMP girl" and keep things "decent." Here she is pointed out below:

and the original nymph copied from is quite similar looking...

Actually, that is who I originally thought was Lisa Marie, but the article I had read on the painting seemed to infer that she was the one behind MJ and the girl clutching his arm. But now, looking at the original painting on which it was based, I kinda don't think any of the girls were necessarily inspired by Lisa Marie since they all look almost identical to the women in the original painting. In other words, it looks like he just copied the original women and just made slight changes in hair color, etc. But ... at the same time, the weird thing is ... all the women in the original and the MJ painting just so happen to look like Lisa Marie anyway - except the one in the middle! So what is the truth? Ahhhh! I'm so confused!:doh: lol!

Wait NO!!! Ash, think about this for a moment! If you become the LITD girl you may turn into a fine mist then evaporate to nothing!!! For to you, the LITD girl does not exist! Oh my gosh, Ash, come back....you're fading...fading....noooooooooooooooooooo! Aaaaassssssshhh!

*shrugs shoulders*

Ash has disappeared.

Well, you all know where I stand. I never believe she ever existed. (Just funnin' ya, Ash!:cheeky

 

[8701girl]

Actually, that is who I originally thought was Lisa Marie, but the article I had read on the painting seemed to infer that she was the one behind MJ and the girl clutching his arm. But now, looking at the original painting on which it was based, I kinda don't think any of the girls were necessarily inspired by Lisa Marie since they all look almost identical to the women in the original painting. In other words, it looks like he just copied the original women and just made slight changes in hair color, etc. But ... at the same time, the weird thing is ... all the women in the original and the MJ painting do look like Lisa Marie - except the one in the middle! So what is the truth? Ahhhh! I'm so confused!:doh: lol!

Im confused too.

 

[Ashtanga]

Actually, that is who I originally thought was Lisa Marie, but the article I had read on the painting seemed to infer that she was the one behind MJ and the girl clutching his arm. But now, looking at the original painting on which it was based, I kinda don't think any of the girls were necessarily inspired by Lisa Marie since they all look almost identical to the women in the original painting. In other words, it looks like he just copied the original women and just made slight changes in hair color, etc. But ... at the same time, the weird thing is ... all the women in the original and the MJ painting do look like Lisa Marie - except the one in the middle! So what is the truth? Ahhhh! I'm so confused!:doh: lol!

:thinking:...........................................



This is not indecent. It's just a painting. -_- lol!

Well, they all have the same face and only changes the hair color and skin color. The nymph/girl who is holding the arm of Michael does not look like Lisa. > :nono: That's what I'm seeing, or I'm having vision problems. :lol:

Well, you all know where I stand. I never believe she ever existed. (Just funnin' ya, Ash!:cheeky

:shifty:


WHAT? :bugeyed

I exist! :lol: Thanks for making me laugh!!!!!!!!! :cheeky:

:tease:lol!



EDIT.....

Image removed. The request for queen g is an order! And I do not want be banned here. -_-

:fear:

 

[Lisha]

This is not indecent. It's just a painting. -_- lol!

You may feel it is not indecent and "just a painting" and a lot would agree with you, but for those who might feel it is inappropriate to post images here on MJJC that include nudity or partial nudity, would you be willing to be respectful and remove the image from your post? It would be very thoughtful of you to do that, and I would appreciate it so, Ash, and sincerely thank you, if you would. :angel:

 

[MysteriousPhoenix]

Well, the way the description of the painting reads, it seems as though the artist is implying that the nymph in the middle clutching MJ's arm is LMP. But, if that's supposed to be her, he made her look very different. He has given her a dark complexion, dark and wavy hair, etc.

I think perhaps he did this intentionally for a couple of reasons. One reason was probably because he felt he had copied from the original enough as it was and if he had kept the girl in the middle the same, the only real difference woulda been MJ, so this made it a little more "unique." Another reason may have been perhaps he felt it would "look" better if the girl holding MJ's arm resembled him a little more. In either case, I think the final product turned out to be very interesting.

 

[Roxa]

I exist! :lol: Thanks for making me laugh!!!!!!!!! :cheeky:

:tease:lol!

Ashtanga, your posts always make me laugh!:rofl: You're funny!

 

[Ashtanga]

Well, the way the description of the painting reads, it seems as though the artist is implying that the nymph in the middle clutching MJ's arm is LMP. But, if that's supposed to be her, he made her look very different. He has given her a dark complexion, dark and wavy hair, etc.

I think perhaps he did this intentionally for a couple of reasons. One reason was probably because he felt he had copied from the original enough as it was and if he had kept the girl in the middle the same, the only real difference woulda been MJ, so this made it a little more "unique." Another reason may have been perhaps he felt it would "look" better if the girl holding MJ's arm resembled him a little more. In either case, I think the final product turned out to be very interesting.

:agree:

Well, I really do not know what the artist had in mind by the time he was doing this painting. It is difficult know. :thinking:

Oh heavens, many mysteries... :doh: :bugeyed :sigh:

The mystery continues... :fortuneteller:

:shifty:

Ashtanga, your posts always make me laugh!:rofl: You're funny!

:lol:

Thanks! Humor is my surname.

 

[MysteriousPhoenix]

:agree:

Well, I really do not know what the artist had in mind by the time he was doing this painting. It is difficult know. :thinking:

Oh heavens, many mysteries... :doh: :bugeyed :sigh:

The mystery continues... :fortuneteller:

:shifty:




:lol:

Thanks! Humor is my surname.

Well, can't "Thriller" MJ put the popcorn down for one minute and give us the answer to some of these mysteries?!

 

[Lisha]

Image removed. The request for queen g is an order! And I do not want be banned here. -_-
:fear:

Funny girl! And I thank you very much. Thank you, even though you have a different opinion on this, and still you were willing to defer to those who might view it otherwise; that shows true consideration and maturity. I admire you for that. :hug:

Well, the way the description of the painting reads, it seems as though the artist is implying that the nymph in the middle clutching MJ's arm is LMP.

Not sure if this article is making that up to have things more "interesting" and relevant, since at the time MJ and LMP were married and it makes a better story, or...the artist is doing that, because this artist has embellished things before in interviews. So...I'm not necessarily "buying it."

I think perhaps he did this intentionally for a couple of reasons. One reason was probably because he felt he had copied from the original enough

I dunno, something makes me think he didn't have too many qualms about copying the original, yet he was hesitant to admit the fact. In the interview I saw of him awhile back on YouTube where he discusses this painting, he skirts around the fact that this was almost a direct copy from the painting Hylas and the Nymphs, and it seems strange to me that he wouldn't say that outright. Instead he talks a whole bunch of mumbo jumbo as to what each thing in the painting represents to Michael.

In either case, I think the final product turned out to be very interesting.

I agree. But apparently MJ decided in the end not to keep this painting and released BLS to go ahead and find another buyer.

Imagine if this was the likeness of the "possible" LITD girl, and she never knew for sure she was his LITD girl, and then one day online she sees this painting and goes "OH my, that...that...looks like me!..It's me!" And then she realizes that well, how special was I to him if he didn't even keep it and let another male buyer hang it on his wall somewhere, who knows where, with her in it, center stage, topless?

Yeah, that would make her feel all kinds of warm fuzzies, yes? Well...I think no! Let's hope it is not really representing the LITD girl, or geesh!

:agree:

Well, I really do not know what the artist had in mind by the time he was doing this painting. It is difficult know. :thinking:

Very, very true. It is so hard to know the truth about any of this. Michael Jackson's world...*sigh* Oh wait...it's a positive thing; it creates MYSTERY! Okay, I'll try to get with the program.

Oh heavens, many mysteries... :doh: :bugeyed :sigh:

The mystery continues... :fortuneteller:

:shifty:

Michael must think we all like seafood.

 

[Ashtanga]

Well, can't "Thriller" MJ put the popcorn down for one minute and give us the answer to some of these mysteries?!

:nono:


Mystery is the essence -_- and must continue. :wild:

 

[Lainy]

:lol: this thread is so funny. I enjoy myself here.

Aw I'm also confused. :scratch:

Originally Posted by MysteriousPhoenix
Well, the way the description of the painting reads, it seems as though the artist is implying that the nymph in the middle clutching MJ's arm is LMP. But, if that's supposed to be her, he made her look very different. He has given her a dark complexion, dark and wavy hair, etc.

I think perhaps he did this intentionally for a couple of reasons. One reason was probably because he felt he had copied from the original enough as it was and if he had kept the girl in the middle the same, the only real difference woulda been MJ, so this made it a little more "unique." Another reason may have been perhaps he felt it would "look" better if the girl holding MJ's arm resembled him a little more. In either case, I think the final product turned out to be very interesting.

I agree MP.

You know, I think we shouldn't to try understand the Art, what we feel to appreciate it becomes its real meaning for us. Each of us has a different reading the look at this. But I would like to know more about it. lol

But it's pretty even. *Sigh*

After reading my previous post again, I imagined Brett Strong coming here and saying, "Your crazy, it's nothing like that. You know nothing about art." :king2::lol: :doh:

 

[Ashtanga]

Funny girl! And I thank you very much. Thank you, even though you have a different opinion on this, and still you were willing to defer to those who might view it otherwise; that shows true consideration and maturity. I admire you for that. :hug:!

:hug:

Very, very true. It is so hard to know the truth about any of this. Michael Jackson's world...*sigh* Oh wait...it's a positive thing; it creates MYSTERY! Okay, I'll try to get with the program.

That's why I love this man even more. This mystery fascinates me. :naughty: :shifty: :heart:

Michael must think we all like seafood.

:lol:

Aw I'm also confused. :scratch:

You know, I think we shouldn't to try understand the Art

I always say that. -_- :lol: Only the artist can explain us all these things.

After reading my previous post again, I imagined Brett Strong coming here and saying, "Your crazy, it's nothing like that. You know nothing about art." :lol: :doh:

:lol:

 

[MysteriousPhoenix]

Imagine if this was the likeness of the "possible" LITD girl, and she never knew for sure she was his LITD girl, and then one day online she sees this painting and goes "OH my, that...that...looks like me!..It's me!" And then she realizes that well, how special was I to him if he didn't even keep it and let another male buyer hang it on his wall somewhere, who knows where, with her in it, center stage, topless?

Yeah, that would make her feel all kinds of warm fuzzies, yes? Well...I think no! Let's hope it is not really representing the LITD girl, or geesh!

Hey! Maybe the LITD is supposed to be with that guy!:lol:

Well, I dunno, I mean, if he wasn't with his LITD at the time (and we all know he wasn't) then he probably wasn't in LITD "mode," if ya know what I mean, and he probably didn't see the painting for what it really was since he wasn't really "tuned in" at the time and he had his mind on his present relationship.

But, then again, maybe there really is no connection at all to the LITD and he ended up not really liking the thing afterall. Like Ash says, there is absolutely tootly NO WAY of knowing what is in someone's mind (except for me as I am a bit of a mind reader *joking*).

:nono:


Mystery is the essence -_- and must continue. :wild:

Ah, yes, my dear Ash! Ah, yes! And so let it continue ...

 

[Ashtanga]

Like Ash says, there is absolutely tootly NO WAY of knowing what is in someone's mind (except for me as I am a bit of a mind reader *joking*).

Ah, yes, my dear Ash! Ah, yes! And so let it continue ...

:shifty:


P.S. I hope you never get to read my mind. :lol:

 

[Lisha]

Hey! Maybe the LITD is supposed to be with that guy!:lol:

I think he might have been Asian; I hope she speaks his language and doesn't mind living in his country. And for all we know he may be up in the eighties now! But then again, age is just a number and one must look to one's heart. Best Wishes to them both!

Well, I dunno, I mean, if he wasn't with his LITD at the time (and we all know he wasn't) then he probably wasn't in LITD "mode," if ya know what I mean, and he probably didn't see the painting for what it really was since he wasn't really "tuned in" at the time and he had his mind on his present relationship.

Perhaps Lisa Marie, knowing too well that that "center nymph" was not her, gave MJ the ol' ultimatum...


"Either the painting goes, or I go!"


:lol:

And MJ obliged.


MR. HENPECKED!!!!!

I thought he believed in loyality! I thought he wanted his LITD girl to never forget him and he would never forget her...ya know...promises made in secret...oh so true...and all of that.

No wonder he released that YANA vid the way he did...he was trying to make amends to "her"...he had to let her know he still had her in his heart even though his ACTIONS spoke otherwise.



(I'm getting so carried away here, but...havin' fun!)

 

[MysteriousPhoenix]

P.S. I hope you never get to read my mind. :lol: