PLEASE mods do not erase this post. As it's important to me.
By all the nonsense which was & still is posted on here it should not matter.
Besides this post should clear up some issues.
MJJuniorSinceMW;3989081 said:
The man behind this site is Richard Lecoque, a journalist & media guy who worked together with MJ on some projects & since with the estate/sony. He's overlooking the french market as it seems.
I think he wants to tease us, because that's what he did the whole time.
Remeber:
-He tweeted something obviously about a future estate project. Then he went back and said he tweeted only about some project of his own.
-Then he said Chicago & She was loving me are 2 different songs, but both were on the new album.
I think he wants to keep us guessing, talking & freaking out. The same route the estate seems to be going. Just that Richard does it a little more obviously...
Richard Lecocq;3989185 said:
my previous post was deleted.
so here is what I want to say:
I never aimed at "teasing" fans. I have been working on several MJ releases for some 10 years now. My goal is always to share the most accurate news with the fans when I can do it.
Chicago = SWLM
CHICAGO 1945 is not SWLM
when I posted a photograph of projects I have worked on in the past, it was to announce my own MJ next project, which I will announce in full this May.
May these words be understood for what they are. If anyone make their opinion about me, they should know I am here to answer any question. I just think it is always better to talk to aomeone one on one, IMHO.
Thanks.
Hey Richard,
i saw your response yesterday & have to admit that i was a little shocked at your selection of words.
So let me respond to you now:
1. I did not want to say anything bad or even negative of you & your posts/tweets. As i seriously enjoy the updates you give. As i reread what i posted it dawned on me that you could take it in a negative way & feel personal offended. Therefore i say sorry to you, that was not my intention. Once again: I personally enjoy your updates & views on things.
2. The word "teasing": Also, i never intended it to sound bad. As i stated, i THINK that the estate are going the same route, by having us guessing, keeping the tension level up & giving us something to talk about. To me the 'teasing' was never something negative or smthg i did not like. On the contrary, i even enjoy it. I'm positive about all we know so far & positive about how it's being handled by all who contribute to the project.
3. The thing with Chicago & She was loving me. There must be some misunderstanding, or we misunderstood in the past. I asked you on twitter (and i have a screenshot) if Chicago & She was loving me are 2 different tracks. You answered: "2 different songs." Then @Onir_mj tweeted something along the lines: "We know that already. The question would be if both are on the new album?" You answered: "yes." So, to me, you either did not know that She was loving me & Chicago is one and the same. OR you tried to mislead us a little/have a little fun with us, so to speak, to keep us guessing (again i did not take it in a bad way, i just thought the plan is to have a little confusion, so the fans keep talking about the album.)
I NEVER talked about Chicago 1945 (also we THOUGHT at the time that could be the song), instead i asked: Are Chicago & She was loving me one & the same track? And as we know now for sure: Yes they are one & the same. And it is ONE song on the album. Because the other song is „LOVING YOU“ which came to the conversation just recently.
So maybe you could explain what you meant by your tweets really? I’ll post the screenshot with this response.
4. The thing with your own project. I never said you have no own project coming up. I never questioned that. I just said that one particular tweet you sent out was about the new MJ album & later you stated it would have been about your own project.
On this matter, i have no screenshot & i did not found it as i just looked for it, maybe you erased this tweet, i don’t know. But as i remember clearly, that tweet i’m talking about, did not make any sense in connection to your own project, as it was clear to me by the words you choose, it was about the forthcoming MJ album/project/whatever… So that’s also a thing you can answer, but you don’t have to, because it does not matter anymore anyway. The album is out may 13th & that’s that.
5. You choose the wording: „You can continue with your lies, while i continue with my truth.“ I never lied about anything, i simply stated my opinion. Though maybe i could have researched you better or talked to you first. But honestly i prefer to research MJ (LOL). There were simply questions on the forum about you & i explained to the best of my knowledge. I wouldn’t call that lying.
6. The wrong spelling of your name. Well to me your surname isn’t that easy to remember, it also isn’t a very common name (;-) LOL) & when i post something i don’t research any word i type, if it’s correctly spelled or not. Though i pride myself in trying to not make many mistakes when i use my english. I can’t remember all user names & certainly not how they all are spelled. I will try to not forget your surname anymore.
By the way, in your post, you spelled my username also wrong. No probs though, as i know you meant me. Just: One shouldn't throw stones if he sits in a glass house.
So Richard, i hope every things fine now. I did not want to make you angry, nor was my intention to talk bad about you behind your back.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="http://t.co/RQLl7dP1eo">pic.twitter.com/RQLl7dP1eo</a></p>— Xscape_MJ (@Jujujunior) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jujujunior/statuses/459684344651845632">April 25, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="http://t.co/N4OWbLzjbW">pic.twitter.com/N4OWbLzjbW</a></p>— Xscape_MJ (@Jujujunior) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jujujunior/statuses/459684443545153536">April 25, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
