HIStory
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 6
- Points
- 0
Re: News and discussion about new MJ album : Xscape, May 13, 2014.
Everyone understands that still I find it somehow disrespectful that some go on about how any new remix version must be better than the original. I'm excited for the new mixes but it's not a fair comparation when the originals were not finished for release. If someone thinks the finished tracks on the Michael album were all better than the originals it's his prerogative, but it's just an opinion and I do not agree with it. IMO the Michael album lost a lot of opportunities exactly because of poor and sloppy production. Michael would have never released some of those songs with such poor production work done on them. This new album seems to have been made with better care and I hope it will be successful and it will appeal to the general public, but the originals will always be more valuable historically even if they do not have hit potential because they do not sound current or/and are not finished. Like I said it is simply not fair to make that comparation. Artistically I'm certainly more interested in the originals, while I hope the new mixes will become hits.
I'm not even sure why some people attempt to turn this into a (very unfair) competiton between the new mixes and the originals. Without the originals there would not be new mixes. There is nothing wrong with some people being more interested in the originals than in the new mixes. Each to their own.
He is not here anymore to complete them, that's something everyone needs to accept.
Bringing the tracks to life with L.A. Reid supervising the project is comforting. He is an enormous MJ fan and he has worked with him for a long time. MJ was a musical hero and the mainstream public will be reminded by this when listening to the album. His music will never die, I am also looking forward to the new mixes!
Everyone understands that still I find it somehow disrespectful that some go on about how any new remix version must be better than the original. I'm excited for the new mixes but it's not a fair comparation when the originals were not finished for release. If someone thinks the finished tracks on the Michael album were all better than the originals it's his prerogative, but it's just an opinion and I do not agree with it. IMO the Michael album lost a lot of opportunities exactly because of poor and sloppy production. Michael would have never released some of those songs with such poor production work done on them. This new album seems to have been made with better care and I hope it will be successful and it will appeal to the general public, but the originals will always be more valuable historically even if they do not have hit potential because they do not sound current or/and are not finished. Like I said it is simply not fair to make that comparation. Artistically I'm certainly more interested in the originals, while I hope the new mixes will become hits.
I'm not even sure why some people attempt to turn this into a (very unfair) competiton between the new mixes and the originals. Without the originals there would not be new mixes. There is nothing wrong with some people being more interested in the originals than in the new mixes. Each to their own.
Last edited: