It proved to be not a poor decision at all, at least from a commercial and chart aspect.T25 was not a good release. Will I am and Fergie were a embarrassment to put on the greatest selling album of all time. That stuff was atrocious and should be forgotten for ever. Can’t believe MJ worked with Will, he was way past his prime at that point. MJs style does not come close to fitting with BEP. Just as bad as putting Timbaland in charge of Xscape. I don’t get these poor decisions at all. I don’t expect anything special with T40, unless there is something totally new I won’t be purchasing repackaged material. Here’s hoping I’m wrong.
Releasing a fully-finished song on an anniversary reissue is the best opportunity? I’d rather they save it for a proper album.NOOOO. where is Chicago 45?? WTF? That is sooo stupid. It could be the best opportunity to finally release this song! And they fcked up this again....
Not very exciting, in my opinion. I was hoping for some never heard before song as the first track announced.It seems that the first track on disc 2 is the original version of Behind The Mask, and it's been announced on Twitter, Facebook and Instgram
Oh no the “tracklist” that was floating online and that got everyone bitching was fake what a surprise!
What proper album?? They dont want to release anything lol! If not now, then we will have to wait more 10-15 years...Releasing a fully-finished song on an anniversary reissue is the best opportunity? I’d rather they save it for a proper album.
Releasing a fully-finished song on an anniversary reissue is the best opportunity? I’d rather they save it for a proper album.
Well, yeah… that’s kinda the point of slow feeding us material — so there’s still stuff to hear in 10-15 years lmfao. I want new music as much as the next guy, but I also don’t want them to blow through the vault. I’d like to still be hearing new MJ tracks when I’m older.What proper album?? They dont want to release anything lol! If not now, then we will have to wait more 10-15 years...
It seems like Steve’s issue wasn’t with it being remixed, but being remixed by somebody other than him, seeing that he’s been reworking it over the last few years. I don’t think we’ll ever get it exactly as MJ left it, unfortunately.I don't necessarily disagree. But we seemed to be consistently saying that Steve blocked Chicago 1945 from being remixed for a "proper album" in the past and that it being included as a 'Thriller-era' demo - as MJ left it more or less - was realistically the only chance we had of getting it. I'm just wondering when that all changed...?
It seems like Steve’s issue wasn’t with it being remixed, but being remixed by somebody other than him
We weren’t talking about whether or not they were necessary, and you know that.@dethorro, the police sirens and heartbeats as effects in the intro were not really necessary.
The heartbeats and police sirens were never taken out. If you go to Apple Music and Spotify right now and play the song, you will hear them on both the original Bad and on Bad 25.This also seems to explain why these heartbeats were removed from later re-releases of the album.
I didn’t say it hadn’t. I said it was rather unusual to have a song with those sounds and that theme on an album, in 1987.Also, using car/motorbike sounds in songs had already been in existence by other acts.
I have faith he will at least keep it close to the original intentions as that seemed to be his problem with the remixing. Still, I agree we will probably never get it how it was left originally which is unfortunate.Well, yeah… that’s kinda the point of slow feeding us material — so there’s still stuff to hear in 10-15 years lmfao. I want new music as much as the next guy, but I also don’t want them to blow through the vault. I’d like to still be hearing new MJ tracks when I’m older.
It seems like Steve’s issue wasn’t with it being remixed, but being remixed by somebody other than him, seeing that he’s been reworking it over the last few years. I don’t think we’ll ever get it exactly as MJ left it, unfortunately.
I don’t think it’s entirely implausible that the estate resurrects their “one single every couple months” model, and that “Chicago 1945” is used as one of them. At least, that seems more plausible than Steve working on it and finishing it, only for it to go under the radar on T40.
I’m hoping the same, but having MJ’s original producers finish his material has had a 1:1 success ratio in my opinion (for every John McClain, there’s a Lenny Kravitz). It’s always the honorable option, but it’s a toss up.I have faith he will at least keep it close to the original intentions as that seemed to be his problem with the remixing. Still, I agree we will probably never get it how it was left originally which is unfortunate.
We all might be dead tomorrow. I might get hit by a bus on my way to work. I want them to release everything they have in a ten-CD box set right now. People who enjoy waiting for stuff can decide by themselves to only listen to a few songs every year, over the next 50 years if they want.Well, yeah… that’s kinda the point of slow feeding us material — so there’s still stuff to hear in 10-15 years lmfao. I want new music as much as the next guy, but I also don’t want them to blow through the vault. I’d like to still be hearing new MJ tracks when I’m older.
Why would the writer to a song get to decide what is done with a recording he didn’t pay for? Don’t those decisions rest with the record company or those who hold the rights not to the composition but to the recording?I don't necessarily disagree. But we seemed to be consistently saying that Steve blocked Chicago 1945 from being remixed for a "proper album" in the past and that it being included as a 'Thriller-era' demo - as MJ left it more or less - was realistically the only chance we had of getting it. I'm just wondering when that all changed...?
I can’t tell if this is sarcasm or not, lol. I want to hear everything too, but it’s not all about me.We all might be dead tomorrow. I might get hit by a bus on my way to work. I want them to release everything they have in a ten-CD box set right now. People who enjoy waiting for stuff can decide by themselves to only listen to a few songs every year, over the next 50 years if they want.
And if a double decker bus crashes into us, to die by your side is such a heavenly way to die.We all might be dead tomorrow. I might get hit by a bus on my way to work..
Yeah,and?simply unbelievable..
These are the first reactions of the fans
It is on the official Michael Jackson website, under their News Section.where is the official statement regarding Track 1?
Thriller 25 project was nice the deluxe with dvd and the book vinylIt proved to be not a poor decision at all, at least from a commercial and chart aspect.
The 'Thriller 25' anniversary release served its purpose at that time because it sold a lot but also because Michael Jackson was again on the top of the charts while he reached the top ten in many national charts.
Especially, considering two important things: he just came from a turbulent period for him, and also that he had been inactive in the music industry for nearly five years.
Also, due to the inclusion of some contemporary and successful guest artists on that 'Thriller 25' anniversary release, many young listeners became aware of the original 'Thriller' album.
@dethorro, the police sirens and heartbeats as effects in the intro were not really necessary.
This also seems to explain why these heartbeats were removed from later re-releases of the album.
The strength of 'Smooth Criminal' comes down to its song-writing (melody, hook, etc) rather than to the way it was produced.
Also, using car/motorbike sounds in songs had already been in existence by other acts.
The 'Love Is The Drug' song (released in 1975, by English rock band Roxy Music) is just one of the many examples.
Yeah,and?
It's not like we started swearing at the Estate or something 0_0
I'm not a supporter of negativity myself but I understand the dissapointment of some fans.