The MJ Estate Has Updated the FAQ Page on the Official Website

DuranDuran;4301602 said:
John also said that he would write songs like I Am The Walrus & Glass Onion on purpose to stump academics and people who would analyze lyrics who he thought took the music too seriously or were pretentious. It's not really a surprise he hooked up with Yoko Ono who was said to have weird art. They fit together better than he did with his 1st wife Cynthia. Who else in The Beatles would put out an album with themselves naked on the cover? :rofl:

Absolutely. And I agree he and Yoko were a perfect match. Not a popular opinion, I know. :)

We’re of course wildly offtopic by now, but when someone disrespects The Beatles, I’m here for the fight! :D
 
Ef0BwcgWsAMLqdz
 
ScreenOrigami;4301594 said:
Claiming that The Beatles are overrated doesn’t make you look cool. It makes you look uneducated. There, I said it. :laughing:
Yes. People who aren't fans have no idea of their creative brilliance and innovation. All they see is a load of hype over something they don't like and because they don't understand the reasons behind it they just dismiss them as "overrated".

Smoke and mirrors;4301595 said:
Well, this backfired quickly, the "envy of all other estates" sentence has been erased lmao.
An absolute trainwreck, everyone is outraged on twitter.
Yeah, looks like that section has been cut down quite a bit. Don't know what they were thinking posting that hubristic rant to begin with.
 
i know i have visit the site in past. i only visited for michael. if i never look up for michael i wouldn't never realize that website exist.
The photos there is mostly all it's good for. They have a lot of good pictures of the Jackson family and other musicians & actors. They're probably the people who watch the Wendy Williams show and made her popular. I think Lipstick Alley might have invented cancel culture. ;) :laughing:
 
If people want to continue to talk about The Beatles there is a thread for them in the Anything Goes section. Since they aren't mentioned in the Estate FAQ we're just going way off track in here.
 
DuranDuran;4301607 said:
I wouldn't advise you to look at Prince.org where people argue about whether Prince was bald and had on a toupee or not. :rofl:

I saw that one forum post a year ago that he/she turned traitor after watching the Cologne 88’ when the interlude played “It’s Gonna Be A Beautiful Night”. I was extremely disgusted by that individual going traitor over the interlude. Absolutely disgusted.
 
The photos there is mostly all it's good for. They have a lot of good pictures of the Jackson family and other musicians & actors. They're probably the people who watch the Wendy Williams show and made her popular. I think Lipstick Alley might have invented cancel culture. ;) :laughing:

:laughing:
 
Yes. People who aren't fans have no idea of their creative brilliance and innovation. All they see is a load of hype over something they don't like and because they don't understand the reasons behind it they just dismiss them as "overrated".


Yeah, looks like that section has been cut down quite a bit. Don't know what they were thinking posting that hubristic rant to begin with.

Does the same person that responds to emails write the statements on the website, can't remember her name, but it sure sounds like her.
 
not releasing new music/demos because it would show Michael in a bad light is utter bullshit.

they are just too lazy and constantly failing in releasing quality projects.

shameful releases: OTW with chalk, this is it anniversary release, scream album, Michael album (fake tracks).
also ignoring dangerous 25.

worst estate you can think of, considering its MJ.

actually bad 25 and Xscape + genuine 'Michael' tracks were enjoyable.
 
Does the same person that responds to emails write the statements on the website, can't remember her name, but it sure sounds like her.

I think so. her name is Alicia she has made the fan community look bad alot of times before....

looks like the FAQ has been updated again and it took off the part about how other estates are jealous of the MJ estate. which is good because it was a stupid move. i guess they saw fans reactions from it.
 
Last edited:
DanGerouS-;4301629 said:
not releasing new music/demos because it would show Michael in a bad light is utter bullshit.

Yeah, how is releasing MJ’s demos showing him in a bad light?

They’re not supposed to be alternative versions of the finished songs, but an insight into the creative process. Much like looking at sketches for a famous painting. You wouldn’t replace the Mona Lisa in the Louvre with a sketch, of course. That’s not the idea. The idea is to reveal small insights into how the artist arrived at the finished work.

Demos, studio sessions, multitracks, alternate takes – all of these help to give more context to a finished song.

That’s the idea of releasing demos. Not to make them the next hit single or anything.
 
Either the estate lies about what they have or they don’t have much. MJ dealt with a bunch of scumbag managers and shady business deals throughout his life. Know one really knows what he went through. Blackmail and threats. It wouldn’t surprise me if Thome or Deiter have film reals and unreleased material or if MJ himself destroyed all of it. Nothing would shock me but there has to be a explanation to why the most popular person in the world stuff is missing. MJ filmed everything. I’m tired, I guess I’m past the point of expecting anything new that is of value to me.
 
ScreenOrigami;4301633 said:
Yeah, how is releasing MJ’s demos showing him in a bad light?

They’re not supposed to be alternative versions of the finished songs, but an insight into the creative process. Much like looking at sketches for a famous painting. You wouldn’t replace the Mona Lisa in the Louvre with a sketch, of course. That’s not the idea. The idea is to reveal small insights into how the artist arrived at the finished work.

Demos, studio sessions, multitracks, alternate takes – all of these help to give more context to a finished song.

That’s the idea of releasing demos. Not to make them the next hit single or anything.

Your last sentence is where the estate and the fanbase differ. They don't care about releases unless they feel they can be very successful.
 
I think so. her name is Alicia she has made the fan community look bad alot of times before....

looks like the FAQ has been updated again and it took off the part about how other estates are jealous of the MJ estate. which is good because it was a stupid move. i guess they saw fans reactions from it.

The amount of times she has been rude and made the estate look like utter asses I'm surprised she is still there tbh.
 
The amount of times she has been rude and made the estate look like utter asses I'm surprised she is still there tbh.

i wonder how much staff the estate has. if she doing emails etc. that's makes think that they don't have very much. they need new staff really bad who are long time MJ fans.
 
Back
Top