NatureCriminal7896
Proud Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
- Messages
- 10,259
- Points
- 0
They can make much more money if they give us things HQ.
At the end of the day whether we like it or not thats their job. To make money
Good luck with that if they're depending on profits from releasing music albums. Since the average younger person doesn't buy physical CDs/records/tapes and artists make very little money from streaming. Notice that popular artists today make money from their brand like Rihanna has a popular makeup line called Fenty Beauty. Will Smith said he focused more on acting because he made more money doing that than from putting out records.They can make much more money if they give us things HQ.
elusive moonwalker;4301666 said:At the end of the day whether we like it or not thats their job. To make money
I still wouldn't get my hopes up though. The audio could simply be uploads of all the songs of the album on the Michael Jackson official YouTube channel, which they may have done before with other albums, or on some other form of media. As far as "audiovisual" goes, I am not sure what that could hint at. But like I said, I still would not get my hopes up.Snek;4301692 said:“So, while we still have plans to celebrate HIStory with appropriate audio and audiovisual elements, we don’t believe in making announcements until we are in a position to share all of the relevant details. It is our hope that the world will open up again soon, and allow our creators to finish their work.”
Guys, a release is coming soon. They just haven’t announced it yet. At least I think it could be a release, what else could “audio and audiovisual elements” mean? Sounds like an album and accompanying DVD/Blu-Ray film/concert/documentary/etc. They have enough on their plate as is, give it time. We have waited this long, haven’t we?
Your last sentence is where the estate and the fanbase differ. They don't care about releases unless they feel they can be very successful.
Serious Effect;4301697 said:I still wouldn't get my hopes up though. The audio could simply be uploads of all the songs of the album on the Michael Jackson official YouTube channel, which they may have done before with other albums, or on some other form of media. As far as "audiovisual" goes, I am not sure what that could hint at. But like I said, I still would not get my hopes up.
This pushes me to hypothesize that if John Branca was not involved in the legal courts, our opinion on the Estate would be quite disparate from our opinion now. Of course that may be a bit of a stretch, but it's just a thought.I think this is the major downside of having a lawyer (Branca) as the Estate's executor. Obviously a lawyer's primary focus is going to be how much money he can pull from a project. And that makes some sense, because any company is going to want to see a decent financial return, especially if the budget is big. But it's pretty obvious that Branca is the guiding force of the Estate and that McClain is more of a backseat/silent collaborator (which explains why he evidently was vocally against the Cascio tracks but didn't have much leeway).
I'd bet anything that if the roles were reversed -- Branca stuck to the legal side and McClain took over creatively -- the Estate would do a full 180 and start pumping out nothing but quality. I can't imagine that though, given his post-stroke low profile.
somewhereinthedark;4301703 said:That’s the reason that I don’t get my hopes up before sometning is announced or released.
I still wouldn't get my hopes up though. The audio could simply be uploads of all the songs of the album on the Michael Jackson official YouTube channel, which they may have done before with other albums, or on some other form of media. As far as "audiovisual" goes, I am not sure what that could hint at. But like I said, I still would not get my hopes up.
Well yeah I know that, that's every other Estate's job as well, and they're doing it whilst also pleasing fans.
Oh please noThey will probably release the Munich 1997 concert.
lol can't say I disagree with everything said here. This sums it up:
We want to spend money but for a nice item
I think so. her name is Alicia she has made the fan community look bad a lot of times before....
ScreenOrigami;4301584 said:But isn’t it obvious that someone who doesn’t even like the Beatles also wouldn’t be interested in hearing their demos? You’re obviously not part of the market for Beatles demos.
ScreenOrigami;4301594 said:Claiming that The Beatles are overrated doesn’t make you look cool. It makes you look uneducated. There, I said it. :laughing:
Mikky Dee;4301827 said:You're acting like you did something special. Expecting everyone to just fall in line with a "universally" accepted MYTH, presumably so they won't be ostracised from the herd isn't education, it's indoctrination and socially constructed peer pressure.
How has Alicia made the fan community look bad? I'd like to see evidence of that statement.
There are 4 different versions to choose from:
Expecting everyone to just fall in line with a "universally" accepted MYTH, presumably so they won't be ostracised from the herd isn't education, it's indoctrination and socially constructed peer pressure.
They never said that they found the film reels. It was just some rumor or speculation.MJJExpert;4301830 said:Wait wait wait....back in 2012 Estate told us they found Bad 88 film reels "just before" the official DVD release and now they are saying: "not everything that was created by Michael actually made it into Michael’s storage facilities (including, for example, the high def footage of the full Bad Tour concert at Wembley)" (!!!).
p.s. why they did not mention MICHAEL album (2010) on the list of what they have done after 2009? C'mon... :shutup: