Nope.yep absolutely yes [for me]
Not really. Nature does many weird, wonderful and unexpected things but I still can't get that excited about this particular thing. Maybe bc I already knew the frogs also do it.best part - magical
Nope. Not for me. They float. Or, rather, they hang about in a weirdly inert (and boring) way.they dance
I don't have many, actually. Usually, if peeps are posting stuff I don't like I just ignore and don't engage. But sea horses and frogs def gross me out. Frogs jump around, fgs! Right under your flaming feet!fair enough i hate the food thing here we all have our hate it! /s
Goes without saying.everyone feels differently woman!
No, I just had some toasted fruit loaf earlier and now I need more. I need to skedaddle!did i just drive you all fruit cakey lol
Ah, I see! I wasn’t paying attention. Yes, indeed, we abbreviate ‘nummer’ (number) as ‘nr.’ But I like your version better. It has a more “classical’ look to it. That is, however, if I can have it without the full stop. Since it’s a contraction of Latin ‘numero,’ and since I’ve recently learned that you fellow Brits don’t put periods after contractions, this instigates a .Bc I write No.1 and he always writes nr 1 and I wasn't fully aware that there was such a difference. I am monolingual and these small details escape me.
It suddenly struck me that the royal houses of our both countries holds the answer. And you’re right, we would never put the ordinal anywhere else than where it’s at in “Carl den sextonde (Gustav).” You do it the same way, right? “Elizabeth the first” and so on.You've slightly missed my point but no matter, it wasn't that interesting, lol. In English we would never write 'the first soul brother'. It doesn't flow.
yesNope.
pretty things too , at times changing colours . leaves ..it's all very interesting i guessNot really. Nature does many weird, wonderful and unexpected things
well i can and will and you can't n wont . so there we gobut I still can't get that excited about this particular thing.
i am not a fan of frogs i kissed too many they disappointMaybe bc I already knew the frogs also do it.
they aren't bloomin balloonsThey float. Or, rather,
they bounce , and hang about ~ how's that ?they hang about in a weirdly inert (and boring) way.
it's a rolling thread . usually isn't it ?I don't have many, actually. Usually, if peeps are posting stuff I don't like I just ignore and don't engage.
fair enough and i'll still post those horses of seaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa and you can still post your afternoon teeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaBut sea horses and frogs def gross me out.
i don't like nor care for them i guess they can be like spiders in a way , the jump friction in some dont careFrogs jump around, fgs!
mm that's trueRight under your flaming feet!
dont say it then fsGoes without saying.
good thingNo, I just had some toasted fruit loaf earlier and now I need more.
alright see you laterI need to skedaddle!
ooooh i refresh n see you n your running text yapping again lolis ---Not suitable for running text.
Yes?Oh , if you really want my written word on this seahorse ...
actually, they look like a mutant balloon.they aren't bloomin balloons
Yeah, Fuz got me going, there!you can still post your afternoon tea cake
Well, you started that bit so ...dont say it then fs
Toast in an air fryer doesn't really work. It comes out too dry, like French toast. Weird.alright see you later
Now you get it ...took some time
Alright . ill let you have that one . especially when they do that puff thingactually, they look like a mutant balloon.
he's always doing it , he's a sugar beastYeah, Fuz got me going, there!
you'll finishWell, you started that bit so ...
toast this time of night ...Toast in an air fryer doesn't really work.
i'd probably like that maybe dont knowIt comes out too dry, like French toast. Weird.
Thing is, we do use the full stop for No. 1 etc. I think it's an Americanism that we are now stuck with. As for not using full stops after contractions, I think it depends. We write Revd without a full stop but Rev always gets one. And Rev gets used way more than Revd so maybe it's one of those rules with many exceptions.Ah, I see! I wasn’t paying attention. Yes, indeed, we abbreviate ‘nummer’ (number) as ‘nr.’ But I like your version better. It has a more “classical’ look to it. That is, however, if I can have it without the full stop. Since it’s a contraction of Latin ‘numero,’ and since I’ve recently learned that you fellow Brits don’t put periods after contractions, this instigates a .
Exactly so.It suddenly struck me that the royal houses of our both countries holds the answer. And you’re right, we would never put the ordinal anywhere else than where it’s at in “Carl den sextonde (Gustav).” You do it the same way, right? “Elizabeth the first” and so on.
You'll have to shake it out of meYes?
ooooh i refresh n see you n your running text yapping again lol
post a pic ?
of something cool ...
‘Rev’ isn’t a contraction, though, is it? And therefore it would be wrong not to have it followed by a period.Thing is, we do use the full stop for No. 1 etc. I think it's an Americanism that we are now stuck with. As for not using full stops after contractions, I think it depends. We write Revd without a full stop but Rev always gets one. And Rev gets used way more than Revd so maybe it's one of those rules with many exceptions.
I do get confused between abbreviations and contractions, lol. Also, tbh, I don't actually care about this. We did do all this stuff at school but it's not madly interesting to me. My understanding of English grammar - or good sentence construction - rests far more on my reading than it does on anything I did at school. Years of reading good journalism (now in free fall, sadly) and classic literature taught me more than school ever did, imo. Or, at least, jammed it into my head more securely.‘Rev’ isn’t a contraction, though, is it? And therefore it would be wrong not to have it followed by a period.