AHAHSHAHAAHAAHAH yeah i just f said that babe ! FOR FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF SAKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE| cant be all berty shirty for a bloody gig im dizzy i cannot deal with any of thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisHe wouldn't have been dressed like that, though. Not for a gig.
Nice.Yes it is!
It's from 1980 american Music Awards
Well, of course. Michael had been in the business so long he knew practically everyone. Besides, it's a photo from an awards thingy. So the photo op thing is standard.m knew the sly guy !n
zip it and show me moreThe Sly in the MJ photo, it looks more like he’s wearing what he wore during the 1974 AMAs?
This is a very lovely suit. The colour yeah. I like sly taste silky silky!Michael checks out. I wonder about Sly, though. Did he have a wardrobe change during the ceremony?
Wthe title gets me all fired up , where's the appreciation ? Sly is a part of mjjc to meMust admit, I'm not mad keen on the actual title.
mmmm yep you will do babe , because the title is debatable to put it politelyI think that's why I forgot all about it even though I've posted stuff on it.
hang about , they can merge it idkThat said, I can't face re-posting everything onto yet another thread.
yes it is very very valuable thank you ! that poster link was fab ty and the other link ...The content of the thread is fine. DuranDuran has posted stuff and I have and I think it's OK.
yeah its jackedBut the title is a bit clunky and misleading, somehow.
we need a new one to be merged with whats already there i reckonObviously we can't change the title.
Thank you zin@Agonum, whaddya think? I'm inclined to leave it as it is although I can appreciate wendi's point.
that's ' in the moment' That's just past "WEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEeeeeee!!!" that's weeeeeeeeeee in its most unspeakable form.Yep. That's pure 'wendi-speak'.
Refreshing 2 know but they don't really celebrate this guy as they should. Fact he is still with us , i thought they would be all over him .The press hasn't been so bad to Sly, imo.
........They like and respect him and understand his place in the grand scheme of things. They take him seriously unlike the general attitude to Michael. Sly kinda flies under the radar but I think that's partly bc his career ground to a halt far too early. And that's really down to his lifestyle. He just blew up everything. Perhaps not intentionally but it happened, nevertheless.
yes i'm noticing this tooSo he's really celebrated, otoh, and yet weirdly low-profile and almost off the radar, otoh.
i can never forgive those dirty headlinesMichael's troubles with the press, especially the MSM, is a whole different thing.
Absolutelamundo , I do not rate it either !as a 'journalist'.
exactly !Never liked her even before
Are they sticking zin? Should take 8 mins or so 200°C / 400°FJacket potatoes and air fryers do not seem to be a great combination.
js!
I think they do, though,Refreshing 2 know but they don't really celebrate this guy as they should.
They were when the memoir came out and they will be again if the doc sees the light of day. There was tons of stuff back in the summer, you just didn't see it.Fact he is still with us , i thought they would be all over him .
Don't know but I've tagged you and wendi over on the Sly Stone thread so dropping this over here in case it didn't work.No, I have not. Watching now. Chaka!
Why does the tag feature not produce alerts? I merely stumbled upon this post of yours by chance!
oh, I'd forgotten that. Yeah, that works.Wthe title gets me all fired up , where's the appreciation ? Sly is a part of mjjc to me
mmmm yep you will do babe , because the title is debatable to put it politely
hang about , they can merge it idk
we need a new one to be merged with whats already there i reckon
Yes, Dirty Diana.i had to trek back because this was bothering me , before i do anything else , because it's alot to examine- we're talking about DD here right ? [ i was being moved by the midnight special floof sparkly pink hat videos! then you yapped about DD i can't be blamed!
onwards
brb
Agree. Its title ruins it.i dont like the current thread for sly , needs to b an appreciation thread There isn't [Though i'm still looking ]
I think Sly deserves a proper appreciation thread.Must admit, I'm not mad keen on the actual title. I think that's why I forgot all about it even though I've posted stuff on it. That said, I can't face re-posting everything onto yet another thread.
The content of the thread is fine. DuranDuran has posted stuff and I have and I think it's OK. But the title is a bit clunky and misleading, somehow. Obviously we can't change the title.
@Agonum, whaddya think? I'm inclined to leave it as it is although I can appreciate wendi's point.
No , i adore the feeling of my confusion it excites me to go even wilder !
SO MORE
No, no merging. Because the title is linked to the first post, which in turn sets the tone for the thread.Wthe title gets me all fired up , where's the appreciation ? Sly is a part of mjjc to me
mmmm yep you will do babe , because the title is debatable to put it politely
hang about , they can merge it idk
yes it is very very valuable thank you ! that poster link was fab ty and the other link ...
yeah its jacked
we need a new one to be merged with whats already there i reckon
Thank you zin
Do it.alright well ..
i'm gonna go for it ,
It doesn't really matter. No-one will read the first post and then start fretting just bc the title doesn't contain the same vocab. Plus, if it's merged with a new thread, presumably the old wording is retained, anyway. Not sure how the merging thing works.No, no merging. Because the title is linked to the first post, which in turn sets the tone for the thread.