It's a fact that these songs has the same singer....
@ Korgnex, I said they were "way off" because this is was the second time you had corrected the lyrics upon instruction from another poster, and now the thrid in post #106.
There were more than one Michael singing over at The Cascio's house now?No it isn't.
To be honest, it's my least favorite Cascio track so far. I'm not denying it's Michael, but if it is, I don't understand why they butchered his voice like this, this is worse than All I Need. "Never have I ever been so sureee" and those ad-libs "Whoa-ohhh-yeaa" I just can't imagine Michael sounding like this, in any circumstance, it's so modern popish, and that's not good
No it isn't.
wtf??unfortunately, that's not what you meant or attempted to imply.
Nice try, though.
Yea, he's in parts of the song, no doubt. But that first verse is highly questionable.
AnnieRUOkay89;3193710 said:Yea, he's in parts of the song, no doubt. But that first verse is highly questionable.
Kapital77;3193718 said:Glad that you are starting to think about the BIG possibility of Jason Malachi in the Cascio´s songs.
:clapping:
:bugeyed:bugeyedI can clearly hear "a" and not "the". How? Simple. "A" is assimilated to "r" of the conjugated verb "be" --"'re", thus the isolated syllable becomes "ra".
As far as grammar is concerned, "a" is justified, i.e. "any queen", as opposed to the definite article "the" indicating that we are supposed to know the Queen. So "the" doesn't make sense. If it were "the" Queen, which queen would we be talking about in the lyrics then?
p.s. As far as phonetics is concerned, if the article "the" was used, it would have sounded [da] and not [ra].
I do not wish to hear arguments, Please pm if you wish to do thisAnd? I'm not a native speaker (but you are, aren't you?). I've just made a very few mistakes and you're laughing at me for that.
Don't you know how to be respectful? You could do better, I know you can be more polite like you've used to be.
Don't take different opinions as a personal assault.
Peace.
:bugeyed:bugeyed
I do not wish to hear arguments, Please pm if you wish to do this
.............................................................................................
I havent heard it yet can someone post a link please
1) The Cascio songs are no masterpieces
2) The vocals have been processed
3) The music is all-new and wasn't envisioned by MJ
You forgot 4) : people know IN ADVANCE they are Cascio tracks, which influences the way they listen to them.
Arent you all bored of this crap by now? Seriously, i've been one of the main culprits for arguing over the past 2 months and I have gotten so bored of seeing the same old things being said over and over and over again, its getting us nowhere. Come on guys, I thought we would be able to avoid this kind of thing again.
We have to stop repeating ourselves.
One side believes it sounds like MJ, the other doesnt. Its allways going to be like that until either side is proven wrong. You should be used to it by now.
We ESPECIALLY need to stop stating our opinions as fact.
Both sides, PLEASE. Stop putting each other down for their beliefs, stop stating your opinion as fact, stop repeating yourselves all together. I'm not a mod. But it became stale a long long time ago and has never been too nice to begin with.
Control yourselves, for the love of god. Control yourselves. haha
If you see someone saying something you dont agree with, at least just disagree with them respectfully and state your opinion. If it annoys you, take a step back and realise that anything you say to this person isnt going to change anything, that person wont change their mind and it isnt going to magically reveal the truth behind these tracks just because you have put someone down for their opinion.
If you see something you dont like, just think....no, what I am about to say is boring.
good.....GOD.
The Debate posts are for these types of discussions. If youre OVER IT then don't come into the DEBATE threads. The peacemaker thing is not going to work when the very thing we hold dear about Michaels talent and legacy is at question. We speak from how we feel because we feel strongly. Myself, I really really really can't understand how people think they are hearing Michael. However, it's like the american idol auditions. People have different ears....to me, the people thinking that that's michaels voice are exactly like the people that think they can sing when clearly they cannot....there's a disconnect there. I believe for some of the BELIEVERS that they know it doesn't sound like the Michael were used to hearing but they want it to be him so bad that they are accepting it as him and that's fine....but I'd have to be drunk and half deaf to confuse the casico tracks from authentic mj tracks.
LTD, I know excactly where you are coming from and I'm in now way failing you for your thinking. I wish things were different however this is as close to "debate" as we're going to get. For those of us who can't take the intensity level of the debate threads I would think it best they stay out of these threads.
At this point no one is going to convince anyone of anything.
Sad you feel this way, I keep listening to this song. It's probably my favorite of all the 'Cascio tracks' we've heard yet! Kind of the proof for me that it's Michael, although I had been leaning more and more on that lately. Amazing song, nonetheless! By the way, I really do love Why by 3T!
edit: also, I'm aware that Why is actually a MJ track given to 3T.