You know what i'm thinking? ...Maybe All I Need and Carry On sound more convincing than the Cascio tracks on Michael because they're not produced by Teddy Riley and thus don't feel as cobbled together. No cut and paste adlibs, no overprocessing...
IMO Teddy was a bit sloppy compared to other producers.
Ever wonder why Hollywood Tonight is being questioned too?
...There's your answer.
Wenghua;3192988 said:BUMPER SNIPPET, this only adds to the issue of individual differences in perception.
We are all different, we do have different hearing abilities, and perceive in different ways.
As to me, I could never hear Michael in Mamacita. NEVER EVER. NIL.
So I’m really curious how one could hear Michael there in.
Therefore it was a lesson only for you and only for those whose individual perception misled them into thinking they would hear Michael's voice in Mamacita and similar tracks.
Oh no, it’s not about to twist your statement (and for some reason I feel you got me, BUMPER SNIPPET) – “the only highlighted” wording rather drops the hidden hint and questions the validity of the conclusions made up based on your previous experience.BUMPER SNIPPET;3193007 said:Do you understand now when I say that some people twist what I say?
You can clearly see that the only highlighted point was "all of us" in my statement by Wenghua, and the part "who believed it was Michael's voice" was completely disregarded.
Thanks for pointing it out for me
It's a fact that these songs has the same singer....i'm completely the opposite of your opinion ,,,these two songs are so cheesy compared to Teddy's songs..i mean Monster is 1000% MJ and B N is great too...but these ones , i do not know but since Sony did not approve them i'm not rushed to call them 100%
Your not doing wrong :no:but you have all got to calm down a bitPentum;3193160 said:Hehehehehehe, I thought this song was suppose to opens everyone eyes about the Cascio tracks not being Michael. Guess I was wrong.
OK your point is justifiedVlens;3193209 said:This is getting rediculous..... I heard this song on different sites and do you know what they all say? That this is Michael Jackson for sure ... And do you know what the result of this paranoa is? Go look on youtube for hollywood tonight, how many people say that is a fake song ...
ya, sure, Sony got up one morning and said to themselves, Mj songs aren't good enough... We have to use an imposter .... cause those songs will be so much better ... cause they are better singers then MJ. So in 5 months time they hired someone to record 10 songs that have more potential then Mj's last album invincible ... and the lyrics sound just like a MJ song. o, and we do think nobody will notice ...
Ridiculous.... friends ask me if people really believe this stuff, yea!
I think this conversation should go to pm sorry ;DWenghua;3193300 said:Oh no, it’s not about to twist your statement (and for some reason I feel you got me, BUMPER SNIPPET) – “the only highlighted” wording rather drops the hidden hint and questions the validity of the conclusions made up based on your previous experience.
How can you who has been fooled by Mamacita (or other soundalikes attempting to imitate Michael) once be so determined about your ability to distinguish between the vocals and layering on the Cascio’s tracks now? Once and for all?
Do you regard it as inconceivable that your auditory sensation and perception may mislead you again?
2) I can make you feel (try to cure the queen) should be (like you're a queen), what you have doesn't make sense.
@MJRemixed: "Way off"?
With all respect, there are about 3 little errors and 2 disputable spots.
It's 4 syllables, "like you're" doesn't fit. It also rather sounds like "the queen" and not "a queen".
Yeah, "try to cure the queen" doesn't make much sense and I also think it's wrong. But what you've suggested doesn't fit either.
Try to cure the queen.
...Classic Korgnex.
Korgnex said:2) I can make you feel (try to cure the queen) should be (like you're a queen), what you have doesn't make sense.
It's 4 syllables, "like you're" doesn't fit. It also rather sounds like "the queen" and not "a queen".
Yeah, "try to cure the queen" doesn't make much sense and I also think it's wrong. But what you've suggested doesn't fit either.
Try it better. I've just written down what it sounds like.
@MJRemixed: "Way off"?
With all respect, there are about 3 little errors and 2 disputable spots.
It's 4 syllables, "like you're" doesn't fit. It also rather sounds like "the queen" and not "a queen".
Yeah, "try to cure the queen" doesn't make much sense and I also think it's wrong. But what you've suggested doesn't fit either.
Wenghua;3193300 said:Oh no, it’s not about to twist your statement (and for some reason I feel you got me, BUMPER SNIPPET) – “the only highlighted” wording rather drops the hidden hint and questions the validity of the conclusions made up based on your previous experience.
How can you who has been fooled by Mamacita (or other soundalikes attempting to imitate Michael) once be so determined about your ability to distinguish between the vocals and layering on the Cascio’s tracks now? Once and for all?
Do you regard it as inconceivable that your auditory sensation and perception may mislead you again?
It is "LIKE YOU'RE A QUEEN" and it contains 4 syllables:
Like-yooo-ra-queen
Okay.
Pronounce-wise, doesn't "like you're the queen" make much more sense?
Can you clearly hear an "a" in it?
--> snippet of disputable spot slowed down
^ Hmm, yes, in colloquial English you would refer to the incumbent Queen.
In poetry however it doesn't have to.
Last question:
Do you guys know what a dental affricate is?
This isn't debating....what I have seen in this thread IS NOT debating. This kind of thing is SO 2010. Its out of fashion, its not cool anymore...from either side. The new craze is trying to guess what kind of vegetable MJ stuffs his crotch with.
I mean just look at what has been said here.
'The lead vocals are clearly MJ'
'No they are not! How can you possibly hear him here!?'
You're not sick of that? Can you honestly tell me that you arent sick of that?
You know when you repeat the same word over and over again until the word makes no sense anymore? Thats what is happening here......I dont even know what a 'vocal' is anymore. :S